So it looks like the main holocaust enforcer on the internet responded to Ryan's video ( youtube.com
fodderposts.blogspot.com
Ryan Faulk vs the holocaust
Evan Rogers
Other urls found in this thread:
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
bitchute.com
haaretz.com
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
twitter.com
Jayden Smith
>This is why I said in the video - say someone claimed to be attacked by a dragon, you say that's impossible dragons don't exist, then he says he was attacked by a bear, well that means he wasn't attacked at all.
>And at root that's what you're doing. You're trudging through the muck of lies, and pulling out plausible stories and documents and testimony to weave together an extermination program that doesn't violate the laws of physics.
lel
Henry Hughes
Ryan Faulk is the king of the e-niggers
Liam Perry
The reasons we can dismiss the holocaust conspiracy are for multiple reasons that don't get into "the funhouse".
1. The western press had decided that Nazi Germany was going to commit a genocide before the war even began.
2. These same media amalgams pushed bogus genocide claims both before and after the war, including against Germany itself.
3. The genocide was determined by victorious powers over a defeated country in a sham trial.
4. Anyone who later said such genocides did not occur - both immediately after the war, and to this very day - are imprisoned or otherwise sanctioned for doing so.
5. The initial establishment of the genocide was done at nuremberg, where demonstrably false and cartoonishly stupid claims were made, though the final judgment was sanitized. Unlike a proper trial, instead of saying "the nazis did NOT use atomic bombs to kill Jews", they acted as if such accusations were never made, and cherry-picked the accusations that weren't impossible and said those had been established.
6. The camps in the western zone were initially claimed to be no different from the eastern camps. Later western investigators determined they were not part of a genocide program, but we must still believe that the camps in the area where the USSR controlled all the evidence were where the genocides actually took place.
7. The total kill count never goes down even as the number of "death camps" get picked off over the decades. This is evidence that the holocaust isn't actually a serious historical thing, but a political thing invented by non-historians; conspiracy theorist historians are then committed to upholding some shred of the Nuremberg verdict and weave the evidence for it after the fact.
Christopher Jenkins
8. To believe the extermination conspiracy, you need to either do two things: blindly believe the retarded basic narrative, which is what most people do, or delve into tomes that make all sorts of connections from cherry-picked documents and code words. Conspiracy theorist is the correct word for you, because it's not some normal historical event with clear and obvious evidence - the evidence is hidden, suppressed, in code, you have to connect train records here with warehouse records there etc.
In short, if all the stuff you say about the holocaust is true, why isn't it just like any other historical fact? Of course it COULD be this grand conspiracy in the way you claim, but in combination with the surrounding factors laid out above, the chance that there was an organized mass genocide of Jews is basically zero.
Joshua Gonzalez
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com
>Around 15:00: Sawing the trees. Who denies this? The author does not cite any historians that agree that this claim is not true.
The guy who runs holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com unironically believes that the Gemans made Jews climb a tree and then made other Jews cut the tree down. How can you reason with a retard like that?
Vid related:
bitchute.com
Grayson Rivera
holo cocks deprogramming course on zero net here
Lincoln Wilson
>Around 15:00: Sawing the trees. Who denies this? The author does not cite any historians that agree that this claim is not true.
Did this retarded nigger get confused and obfuscate in the wrong way? Surely he meant, "who claimed this happened? What historian claims this occurred?".
Christian Murphy
nah he probably meant what he wrote but he'll probably try to claim he meant something else
Benjamin Ramirez
>Now what Sergey does, and this is common of the conspiracists, is to say Nuremberg doesn't matter, read the later historians. Oh this witness is making stuff up, but this witness is real. And so what you're doing is a kind of make-your-own holocaust.
fucking kek