US cannot win in afghanistan

How come Genghis Khan tamed afghanistan, when the US military can't?

Is the US military literally worse at fighting than mongol horse archers? The Khan didn't even use twenty years in that shithole to conquer it and put an end to the rebellion. US military BTFO.

Attached: AfghanistanHDKU3Y75RYKAHD672TEGJDBYUE2EGJDB.jpg (589x500, 69.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_power_(international_relations)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_strategy
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If the U.S. military used the same tactics it would have been over long ago. But we would like for some of the Afghans to survive. For some reason.

>when the US military can't?
because they aren't interested in doing so. the burgers are playing balance of power games with objectives to threaten Iran and fuck with Russia and China
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_power_(international_relations)
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_strategy

It wasn't afghan fighters causing most of the issues. It was ducking Palistan and Iran, combined with a network of manassas used to recruit foreign fighters. It was a religious war.

Genghis simply murdered everyone. If the USA used the same genocidal tactics they too would "win". No man, no problem.

Attached: 1583441366687.jpg (499x265, 19.98K)

That's not the reason the US abstain from using mongol tactics. The mongols left many afghans alive when putting down their rebellion. The issue is that the mongols are just too good for the US to mimic.

>that feel when you will never get to be in a rape battalion to conquer the enemy

He only slaughtered a couple of cities, then the rest of them behaved well enough to let them live.

Because medieval and mongol warfare is very different and the blowback of attempting the same would be worse than any damage the taliban could cause. See how Vietnam was lost at My Lai.

If the US military actually wanted to they could have won the war in 6 months , it’s more profitable for (((people))) to stay there forever