Why don't we meme our own into local, state, and national offices instead of the jews and traitors?
Yas Forums for Congress
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
projects.statesman.com
archive.is
christiansfortruth.com
migrationpolicy.org
twitter.com
Yes, I agree. Where should we start?
>jews and traitors
Jews are just 1.4% of the US population and 0.0025% of the world population
Senate (9% jewish, 650% US over-representation)
Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Benjamin Cardin (D-MD)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
House (8% jewish, 600% US over-representation)
David Cicilline (D-RI)
Stephen Cohen (D-TN)
Susan Davis (D-CA)
Ted Deutch (D-FL)
Eliot Engel (D-NY)
Lois Frankel (D-FL)
Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
David Kutsoff (R-TN)
Andy Levin (D-MI)
Mike Levin (D-CA)
Alan Lowenthal (D-CA)
Nita Lowey (D-NY)
Elaine Luria (D-VA)
Jerry Nadler (D-NY)
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)
Dean Phillips (D-MN)
Jamie Raskin (D-MD)
Max Rose (D-NY)
Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Kim Schrier (D-WA)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
Brad Sherman (D-CA)
Brad Schneider (D-IL)
Elissa Slotkin (D-MI)
Susan Wild (D-PA)
John Yarmuth (D-KY)
Lee Zeldin (R-NY)
Supreme Court (33.3% jewish, 2,400% US over-representation):
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D)
Stephen Breyer (D)
Elena Kagan (D)
There's a lot of persuasive motherfuckers on this board. We need a few to actually shave and put on a suit. I think we gotta start local and at state level. Take back our communities from these shit heads. In my old town the retard city council member made it to US Congress.
Because even if we managed to get enough competent guys who were presentable and could hold their own in a debate, the voting base is shifting further and further left.
Eventually, and I mean within ten years, it will be mathematically impossible for right wingers to win elections anywhere but the deep south, and even that is only temporary.
which local election should we start with?
>2 republicans
wow.
You can't predict the future, user. You don't know what will happen with birthrates or immigration.
In the mean time, it's good to get as much power as possible.
None of the autists here have the balls or the charisma to go outside and preach their nonsense. They will likely be ridiculed to the point where they will end up shooting school kids. I dont recommend it.
>muhammad looking out for his fellow mosque goers
smart shitskin
In my local community the idiot IT manager at my job is also a school board member. So I would say find a local position and work your way up.
>You can't predict the future, user. You don't know what will happen with birthrates or immigration.
Except we absolutely can.
Texas is the last state in the electoral college that makes it possible for Republicans to have a chance at winning, and within the next eight years, it'll be a blue state. Florida will also follow along.
If you think this is impossible, remember that California was a hardcore red state well up into the 80s.
Even if we full-stop halted immigration forever, the change is already guaranteed to happen.
I meant to attach this webm, but that image works as well.
See look, read this:
>Why don't we meme our own into local, state, and national offices instead of the jews and traitors?
see the words "we meme our own" ? That means WE need to decide on a place to target and organize.
If you want me to meme myself into power, you don't have to tell me that.
The Row v Wade flipped everyone. In Texas, most of the dems moved to republican, like Rick Perry. These slime have no party loyalty. In eastern Washington Loren Culp stood up to Inslee on the gun grab. Now he's running for governor. Not saying he's gonna win, but he has more support than the coasties know.
>Except we absolutely can.
No, you can't. You're wrong. You're falling for the linear progression fallacy that leftists so often fall for.
The world is much more complicated than your simple little model. You can't predict the future. Stop thinking you can.
You're right - we do. We need a platform with specific goals. What what /pol's party platform be? In Texas there used to be quite a few libertarians elected to local office because they aligned with what the local community wanted.
>Not saying he's gonna win, but he has more support than the coasties know.
Well, I hope he does. But even then, his victory will be short lived.
I fucking dare you to present me a model that shows anything other than what the pure math presents.
Are you actually denying the great replacement?
The great replacement is happening. Saw it first hand in Texas. However, the Panhandle is now at least 50% Mexican yet they don't all vote Democrat.
The question though is this - why are they voting left and continue to vote left? Why not have anons run as Democrats and slowly shift it to the right? The neocons did this with the libertarian party.
Yas Forums is a chaos demon.
Any attempt to wrangle it to produce anything is a futile and misunderstanding of what 'this' is.
Anonymity breeds alternative, combative and disobedient misbehavior.. it's not organised, structured or sane.
It's fun. We do it for the chaos and anyone else here with crazy bullshit theories are all ex-redd it newfags
With election year we're gonna see a bunch of bullshit shill posts of x is /ourguy/ crap. Why not actually have someone that is our guy and back them in an election?
> the Panhandle is now at least 50% Mexican
Is there any way you can link a source on that?
Not calling you a liar, I've just never seen anything that shows that.
They vote left because of two reasons. The first is obviously the gibs they receive from the left.
If we have to literally become the enemy in order to win, then the system is clearly broken and cannot be fixed from the inside.
The second reason has to do with the inheritability of political ideology, which is around 0.4
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
They are genetically predetermined to a certain degree to vote the way they do.
>present me a model that will account for events we haven't thought of yet
man, you are an idiot. You have no business talking about math.
Your model only works if everything stays the way it is right now... which there's no reason to believe it will.
projects.statesman.com
I'm from that area and it's mostly Mexican now. Used to be mostly white in the 80s.
archive.is
Biden all his kids off to jews too
christiansfortruth.com
>You have no business talking about math.
I'm actually graduating in less than two weeks with a double major in pure math and economics.
I have some business talking about math.
The model as it stands today does in fact assume that everything will stay the same as it is right now, because it more or less will.
Hispanic birthrates are climbing, while white birthrates are falling.
Combine this with the millions of legal immigrants we receive every year, and there is no logical reason to assume that it will all just stop because you want it to.
Present me evidence to the contrary.
Oh geez, I'm sorry user.
I live in Florida right now, so whenever I hear someone say "the panhandle" my mind jumps to the Floridian one.
Yeah I'm aware that not all Mexicans in Texas vote for the left, as a matter of fact it's around 35-40% of them.
Unfortunately, it's still a minority.
Cortez is not Jewish
does someone have the sam pic as OP but when you click on it the all turn into reptiloids?
Have you accounted for the 50% drop in net migration we've had in the past year?
Have you accounted for the immigration ban that trump just put on this week?
What about trump's future policies? Have you accounted for those?
No, you haven't. There's no reason to expect that things will stay the same at all.
>Have you accounted for the 50% drop in net migration we've had in the past year?
That has not happened as you imagine it has.
migrationpolicy.org
Even if it were the case that immigration drops to 0% forever, the demographic change is baked into the cake thanks to the already existing populations and their respective birthrates.
>Have you accounted for the immigration ban that trump just put on this week?
You mean the 60 halt on the issuance of green cards? Yeah, that oughta do it.
>What about trump's future policies? Have you accounted for those?
I distinctly remember Trump attempting multiple immigration bans from multiple regions, and they were turned over every time.
But again, unless Trump magically enacts a policy to deport legal citizens, which he fucking won't, it makes no difference anyway.
>There's no reason to expect that things will stay the same at all.
Correct, there's reason to expect them to get worse.