>In the debate over freedom versus control of the global network, China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.
>...As surprising as it may sound, digital surveillance and speech control in the United States already show many similarities to what one finds in authoritarian states such as China. Constitutional and cultural differences mean that the private sector, rather than the federal and state governments, currently takes the lead in these practices, which further values and address threats different from those in China. But the trend toward greater surveillance and speech control here, and toward the growing involvement of government, is undeniable and likely inexorable.
>In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.
>Beginning in the 1990s, the U.S. government and powerful young tech firms began promoting nonregulation and American-style freedom of speech as essential features of the internet. This approach assumed that authoritarian states would crumble in the face of digital networks that seemed to have American constitutional values built into them. The internet was a vehicle for spreading U.S. civil and political values; more speech would mean better speech platforms, which in turn would lead to democratic revolutions around the world.
USE ARCHIVE.IS YOU FUCKING RETARD NO ADS = HOMELESS JOURNALISTS
Eli Hughes
Jack Goldsmith molested my daughter
Noah Martin
i was there. she tried her best
Tyler Diaz
This OP is a faggot who sucks cocks in hell
Jeremiah Collins
The internet's own boy taught us information is restricted and deadly, we are constantly surveilled... but there is always black grannies. The porn machine will promise peace and stability.
Luke Kelly
>this article sponsored by the CCP Ministry of Truth
This. Starting to seem like The Atlantic is a CCP rag
Daniel Brooks
freedom is slavery. ignorance is strength. let them censor your internet, let them spy on you. gooood goi let them take your privacy, let them OWN you.
Yahoo is all special intrest at least a third of your post get taken off.
Daniel Wilson
Would it matter? Trump's Department of Justice has allowed the big tech companies to get bigger and bigger, and to accumulate more and more power. 'Antitrust' apparently doesn't exist anymore.
Adam Martin
The internet was the best in the 90s, it was slow but you could literally say anything and nobody would care. Also doing stuff like hacking your school's internet was easy because no normalfags had any concept of opsec. And since nobody cared about e-cred you can literally say whatever and people would believe you because there was literally no reason to lie.
I can't believe Jack Goldsmith of the Atlantic is a child rapist (allegedly)
Michael Brown
there is no such thing as free speech, get over it mutts
Cameron James
>It's perfectly reasonable to molest 9 year old girls, if they have big meaty labials--Jack Goldsmith Jesus Christ, people.
Nathan Williams
(((GOLDSMITH))) (((WOODS)))
every. single. time.
Samuel Bell
(((goldsmith))) literal kike
Thomas Hernandez
>reported for treason
what are you some kind of faggot boomer? reporting doesnt do shit
Ryder Price
Nonjews aren't permitted to write articles anymore. Simple as.
Brody Reyes
>muh CCP
It's a Jew rag and this article is written by a Jew. Stop deflecting.
Aiden Reed
You can’t convince me that Harvard is not infested with Chicomms. Where is the FBI? DOJ? DHS? We have GITMO for this exact reason don’t we?
Luke Lopez
The alphabet agencies want a Chinese style control grid too. If we were independent, they would be unneeded, and would lose all their power and have to get real jobs to earn money. All the intelligence agencies have a deep resentment for normal people
