Cause y not am arite?
ITT you post
>GM conspiracies and sources
>evidence of GM degeneracy
>your take on how far GM has come and what it wants next
>kevetching left/pol/ lines on how GM isn't real.
GO!
>inb4*
Gultural marxism thread
Noah Gomez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Parker Williams
another /thread. Hooray!
Carter Adams
dead thread was likely shit my fag. thanks for the bamp.
Owen Butler
Why misspell the title?
Leo Ramirez
cause jannies are trannies. And gultural margsism was a left/pol/ meme. I assumed they'd respond after the last thread died.
Just hang around and give me a bamp wen needed. plz.
Ryder Russell
The last thread was pruned. But yes i shall bump if it's worthy fren
Eli Martinez
cos
Hunter Green
Any idea what is being slid?
Luke Gonzalez
thanks
I ave a half of a paper written out
but is on laptop I gave to fren
However I ave enough in the memory and memery banks to get the thread rollin. Bit of a tangent from the last thread but go with it.
Isaiah Reyes
Yas Forums is in permaslide so it doesn't matter. They hate this shit up em tho.
So.
Michael Peterson
Checked and okpilled.
Grayson Ward
Cultural Marxism is a school of thinking (lol) that at its most basic acknowledges sovietism lost the war, bot rhetorically and and forcefully. Offically in 1990.
Unofficially it was lost, at least mortally way earlier. Basically as the truths of Stalinism started to come out.
Tyler Sanchez
I wouldn't argue that premise, although are we not talking about a cloak for the financiers anyway?
Landon Perry
*morally
Roughly when the truth of life in USSR started to leak out.
Morrally, and practically communist theorists realised they had lost by 58.
So, time for a new theory. the tl;dr of cultural marxiam was that the USSR didn't lose only by being morrally bacnraupt, but also becuase of what they came to consider the 'cultural hegemony'
Jordan Jenkins
argue with lol
Mason Myers
In a way.
Kevin Walker
Debate is for fags. Logic is for fags. Only music and drugs and meditation matter. Only oneness with the Supreme Unity matters. All the rest is the endless flapping of ego. See Corinthians: 13 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned,[a] but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant 5 or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;[b] 6 it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. 7 Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. 8 Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. 11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. 12 For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. 13 So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love!
Jason Watson
Do go on
Ryan Morris
Cultural hegemony was the cornerstone of cultural marxist thought, that is, flip-reversing the Marxian base/superstructure analysis.
John Taylor
>vultural hegemony
my bad, forgot sauce
en.wikipedia.org
Austin Myers
David Wilson
>In Marxist theory, society consists of two parts: the base (or substructure) and superstructure. The base comprises the forces and relations of production (e.g. employer–employee work conditions, the technical division of labour, and property relations) into which people enter to produce the necessities and amenities of life.
>t.wiki
Marxist 'thought' assumed that social position derived from material situation(fair). It also then extended to assume that all social interaction derived from the 'base'After it became clear that Societism was not so good for the unlucky plebs who didn't fit in with the new, top-down, implementation of industrialisation the Marxian left decided to switch tactics.
No longer would the base/superstructure dynamic be one way. Now the superstructure (culture) could lead the base.
This switch tactics is not denied by commies. They just call it neo-marxism instead of the cultural marxiam it really is.
Asher Moore
lol. Coincidence or (((COHENdecece)))
you decide.
Jason Phillips
>Societism
ehhh...
socialism
marxian/hegelian socialism.
sorry.
Eli Phillips
Bump
Ayden Barnes
HOW, does any of this relate to what we experience today?
well, let me tell you.
Chase Hill
Wyatt Morgan
Cultural marxism is a marxism in so far as Marxist thought spawned a school of sociology, namely the Social-conflict school.
>Social-Conflict approach
>Sociologists working from a Social-Conflict perspective tend to view society in terms of conflict between groups. They focus on the power struggles and inequality that exist in society, usually focusing on the influence of race and class on societies.. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels brought the perspective into the mainstream, and it has heavily influenced sociology since.
Gabriel Rodriguez
The social-conflict theory is the thinking permeating society today but is no longer based on the ideas of owner/serf as Marx saw it.
Today it is the foundation of a solid third of the theory underlying the Social(sociological(soft)) sciences encompassing all the faculties promoting the toxic oppression culture 'science'.
Parker Cox
Bump for social justice
Josiah Carter
and for dead wiki articles
Levi Myers
bump
Noah Baker
NEW! IMPROVED!
Anthony Cooper
who could it be...