Reagan did nothing wrong

>1965
>LBJ passes a bill to limit Latin American Immigration and instead focus on Asians
>Spics flood the borders, ignoring the law. States like California legally hire these illegals
>1986
>Reagan wants to make it illegal to hire illegal spics
>Dems tell him he can make it illegal but all spics now (tens of millions) in the country (democrat voters) have to be naturalized, and that 10's of thousands of "refugees" a year from Latin America must be accepted
>He grudgingly accepts
>2020
>Dems knowingly breaking federal law and setting up sanctuary cities, america's workforce bloated with tens of millions of scabs, spics still flooding the border ever year because they know they can get a job, it's now racist to call them illegals

Reagan did nothing wrong

Attached: ronald-reagan-9453198-1-402.jpg (1200x1200, 207.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newsweek.com/reagan-immigration-reform-and-control-act-1986-641806
youtube.com/watch?v=srXYKx-sDws
youtube.com/watch?v=YsmgPp_nlok
youtube.com/watch?v=QxIWDmmqZzY
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no fault divorce
open borders
dedicated a space shuttle to Taliban
called Osama bin Laden a freedom fighter
restricted machine guns
banned open carry
smuggled more cocaine into USA than Tony Montana

Worst person to ever run a country

>open borders
By restricting immigration and punishing people that hire scabs? Are you retarded?

Why Immigrants Were Given Legal Status by Ronald Reagan

newsweek.com/reagan-immigration-reform-and-control-act-1986-641806

In addition to this Being stupid enough to fall for " I'll gladly pay tomorrow for a hamburger today" is a crime in itself. Although I believe he knew what he was doing when he did it.

President Ronald Reagan Dedicating Shuttle Columbie Launch To Afghanistan 1982

youtube.com/watch?v=srXYKx-sDws

>Why Immigrants Were Given Legal Status by Ronald Reagan
Because the dems otherwise veto the bill. This was about lowering crime too, because at the time America was a warzone

He was a vegetable. His wife was running the show. If we get Biden, we'll see another replay of this bullshit.

America being a warzone for a few months longer would've been preferable to the bullshit we must endure now.

>This was about lowering crime too
Lowering Crime? are you fucking serious defending the guy who basically introduced crack cocaine to to America as a crime fighter?

Attached: oliver-north-mug-shot.jpg (937x528, 201.31K)

>>He grudgingly accepts

Typical weak white male cuck was easily defeated. Maybe white goyim retards should stop electing celebrities.

nothing wrong?

the guy demolished the USSR. should me canonized as a saint in every Christian denomination, maybe even in Shi'a Islam too

>the guy who basically introduced crack cocaine to to America
Are you seriously blaming Reagan for blacks preying on other blacks?

The U.S. was complicit with the drug trade to allow for the influx of money lost after the Iran-Contra Scandal. In 1981, the CIA actually helped ship cocaine from Nicaragua to El Salvador and then on to to Texas and Arkansas, and lastly to LA. Drug dealers on the CIA payroll also set up connections between known drug dealers in LA and Compton, and Nicaragua. The CIA allow for the sale of the drugs to the drug dealers, knowing that the money would be used to buy weapons for Nicaragua by their wealthy partners. The drug dealers first distributed the drugs among gangs, and then to individual smaller drug dealers. South Central already had existing drug markets that were virtually ignored by greater society. However, the crack cocaine had a particularly devastating impact.

>The U.S. was complicit with the drug trade
You're ignoring the part where if we didn't play nice with the drug lords everything south of our border would be at war. Is there any actual source that Reagan was directly responsible for drug trafficking? Sounds like people once again blaming the illegal immigration boom of the 70's-80's on him

>Is there any actual source that Reagan was directly responsible for drug trafficking
YES
IRAN CONTRA

Funding anti-communist rebels isn't personally okaying the shipment of narcotics. Why does Reagan catch the blame when every administration since WW2 was doing the same?

your own words
>You're ignoring the part where if we didn't play nice with the drug lords

>Funding anti-communist rebels
freedom fighters

Attached: Osama Bin Laden Newspaper USA Reagan.jpg (1400x951, 445.64K)

Reagan's War on Drugs has been disastrous to Latin America. Why do you think they move here? They weren't flooding in in the early 20th century

So not declaring war on Latin America is bad because instead the US funded rebels to do the job for them, and it's all Reagan's fault. Didn't Jimmy Carter force the Nicaraguan President to seek asylum in the US so we could take control?

They were coming here illegally LONG before that in the early 1900's, nobody talks about it though. They've always been economic leeches.

Reagan is the Oliver Cromwell of America, did a few things that seemed good at the time but the effects of the bad things are still felt to this day

Or maybe people look back on the 70's and 80's and find it easier to attach all the bad things to Reagan.

Not at the level they are now. California was majority white non-Hispanic during Reagan's term as governor

REAAAAAAGAAAN
AAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHA
xD
The beginning of the demise of the US.
As Reagan, as Trump.
You stuuupid fooooooool haaaaahaha

You never heard of Chicago?

>the US funded rebels
Call a spade a spade faggot
You mean the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Attached: reagan-afghan-article.jpg (502x507, 67.87K)

>California was majority white non-Hispanic during Reagan's term
No, see this is the problem. Illegals were there but they weren't counted in the census. Part of the deal to make it illegal to hire illegals was to naturalize them. You're blaming 80 years of illegal immigration on Reagan.

>instead focus on Asians
Is that better? California is now like 15% asian.

Reagan was always a pro-illegal glownigger faggot

youtube.com/watch?v=YsmgPp_nlok

15 IQ goes a long way

>always a pro-illegal
>made it illegal to hire illegals
Lol

Complete nonsense. The floodgates were thrown open in the last 30 years.

Look at this, how many brown people do you see?
youtube.com/watch?v=QxIWDmmqZzY

>He grudgingly accepts
>Reagan did nothing wrong
user you are a retard

>The floodgates were thrown open in the last 30 years.
Wrong. Research how much illegal immigration there was at the turn of the century

My video is from 1980 you fucking kike

Do you have an argument?

you're just fucking wrong dude. I have seen the way things changed even in my lifetime

Yes, that Reagan openly campaigned on "opening the border both ways" and "being sensitive to their [wetback] problems", and that signing a 1986 bill that backfired against anti-illegal advocates does not make Reagan look any better

They stayed mostly in the cities bud. They've always been around in the southwest, slowly creeping. We just noticed in the 70's and 80's, that's why :LBJ tried to stop the trend in 1965

You mean him reassuring the leeches in Latin America and attempting to solve their economic problems so they stop invading our country?

>reassuring the leeches
>solving economic problems
Pick one you absolute kike

>Look at this, how many brown people do you see?
FUCKING BASED

Do you have an argument?

>shilling the hughes amendment nigger on Yas Forums
kek

I already made it. Do you have a refutation?

But at least the Boomers had their fun.

Even though Gen X was earning less than their Silent Gen and Boomer parents in the 90s, that decade is still remembered for having a good economy because the Boomers did extremely well.

Our entire political system and national narrative has been fully Boomercentric for forty years.