And by extension, is the KJV Bible a misdirected, masonic translation?
Was King James a Freemason?
That's why I read the Lutheran translation.
No, but it's still a shitty translation. Of course, the translation doesn't even matter that much if you don't understand the context.
Anyone out here know if it's once saved always saved or lordship salvation? I'm still a new believer and still trying to figure it out
> hook nose
LOL
Also the bible was created by (((them))). There was big infiltration in Christianity or any other redneck fantasy. But the Jewsus Kike cult does get a reboot periodically to keep itself relevant.
>Don't read the KJV goys
>Read my cousin Moishe's new NIV only!
>Anyone out here know if it's once saved always saved or lordship salvation? I'm still a new believer and still trying to figure it out
Yes. If you fall out of the faith, then you were never really saved with to begin with.
Catholic and pretty much every other religion is all about what we can do to gain salvation, Christianity is about what God has done for us (Grace) and that the hard yard has already been done by Jesus (paying the price of our sins on the cross)
>bashing the one true church that our Lord Jesus established himself while on this earth
Catholic is the way to go. Anything else is heresy.
>Anything else is heresy.
Don't be a judgemental cunt.
I don't know but I am skeptical of it. Name me a better version though and I'll read it.
Rosicrucians were behind the KJV bible... so it is possible.
It would probably be more accurate if they were.
>Rosicrucians
That's an alien race for sure.
But they were, surely they must have added some "noise" to make it less obvious.
No but he was a faggot. Everyone knew it.
>But they were
Oh. Okay then. By similar proof, that makes it better.
Read about Francis Bacon and William Shakespeare. Who wrote the KJV bible?
Why Bacon had Lord Verulam as surname? What does "Vere/Mere" mean?
Shakespeare wrote the bible?
Wasn't Shakespeare a pseudonym?
>Read about Francis Bacon and William Shakespeare
Already have.
>Who wrote the KJV bible?
First Westminster Company, translated Genesis to 2 Kings:
Lancelot Andrewes, John Overall, Hadrian à Saravia, Richard Clarke, John Layfield, Robert Tighe, Francis Burleigh, Geoffrey King, Richard Thomson, William Bedwell;
First Cambridge Company, translated 1 Chronicles to the Song of Solomon:
Edward Lively, John Richardson, Lawrence Chaderton, Francis Dillingham, Roger Andrewes, Thomas Harrison, Robert Spaulding, Andrew Bing;
First Oxford Company, translated Isaiah to Malachi:
John Harding, John Rainolds (or Reynolds), Thomas Holland, Richard Kilby, Miles Smith, Richard Brett, Daniel Fairclough, William Thorne;[56]
Second Oxford Company, translated the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, and the Book of Revelation:
Thomas Ravis, George Abbot, Richard Eedes, Giles Tomson, Sir Henry Savile, John Peryn, Ralph Ravens, John Harmar, John Aglionby, Leonard Hutten;
Second Westminster Company, translated the Epistles:
William Barlow, John Spenser, Roger Fenton, Ralph Hutchinson, William Dakins, Michael Rabbet, Thomas Sanderson (who probably had already become Archdeacon of Rochester);
Second Cambridge Company, translated the Apocrypha:
John Duport, William Branthwaite, Jeremiah Radcliffe, Samuel Ward, Andrew Downes, John Bois, Robert Ward, Thomas Bilson, Richard Bancroft.[57]
>Why Bacon had Lord Verulam as surname?
Because that's how peerage works. It was his title. Same as when he was made Viscomte St Albans.
The peerage of Verulam later went to the Grimstons.
I don't know about that, but I'll look into it. All I know is that any King James Version after 1769 is pozzed.
>once saved always saved
A teaching that whatever you do after believing in Christ you're still sealed with the Holy Ghost.
>lordship salvation
Some teaching that if you you're saved you necessarily will stop doing some things, necessarily will do some other things, like maybe stop sinning.
since this really isn't complete without the other part
Yes.
>after 1769
You mean AFTER the initial translation date? Like an errata?
Shut the fuck up kike.
It's claiming to be a correction, yes, but it's really just a corruption. The image posted in the post you're responding to elaborates further.
I don't get it. The Judean existed and was the previous name for Jewish? Or are they insinuating that the "Jewish" noun is a complete fabrication into the bible as a replacement?
The latter.
>Christcucks all think each other are all going to hell
This is why your superstition is a practical joke to grown ups. You are easily used.
are you a roman catholic apostate who is going to burn ? yes
>based on Erasmus' made up translation of partial and corrupt and incomplete Greek 12th hand copies, ecept where he back-translated from the already corrupt Vulgate, or made it up altogether.
Love that snake handling and poison drinking ending of Mark. So inerrant.
says the judgemental cunt...piece of shit
the closest apostles of jesus were jews; therefore whatever you're talking about is something good
*tips fedora*