Attached: 78EF06B6-FABC-4EAC-9B63-639073FD4E99.jpg (2048x704, 243.1K)
Why Did “Socialists” Abandon The Actual Working Class In The West?
Lincoln Thompson
Other urls found in this thread:
Ethan Campbell
hahaha what a fag
Joseph Barnes
The poor are easier to manipulate.
Jonathan Lewis
Not "socialists" user. Rich hypercapitalists LARPing as socialists in order to subvert the movement and keep their money
Jacob Hernandez
Years of USA propaganda created a sense of autophobia in leftist movements. Many think that compromises with the right will yield benefits, when that is simply not true. Good news is that, at least from my anecdotal experience, good, reputable working class movements and communist movements are growing fast.
Grayson Taylor
We haven't. But if you're talking about the actual industrial proletariat, they're few and far between now in Britain. The revolutionary forces in Britain now are the lumpenproletariat and the semi-proletariat. '84-85 was the last hurrah of the industrial proletariat, 2011 riots was the first show of lumpenprole force.
Ethan Nelson
Affluent liberals who think extra taxes to help the poor aren't part of a worker's party.
Asher Kelly
the only thing that unites everybody is the sincere disdain for plebs
Adam Robinson
Because welfare capitalism won. Socialism is only a popular option where oppression is commonplace and socialist organizers can convince the common worker to support their ideology. Western states have poverty but the impoverished people are generally well taken care of.
Welfare capitalism is what many brainlets confuse with socialism.
Henry Torres
I just hear faggotry.