>What do Create Memes, spread Memes, attack the narrative. Join AfD or IB or Einprozent; counter subversion. Get Yas Forums. Get a job. Spread flyers and stickers. Discuss politics with people; call attention to the Unrecht.
>approximation from brain scans Brain imaging granularity isn't good enough. Yet. Plus you need the living brain, not the frozen one. Pretty difficult. Yet. If we have this, we can just emulate the brain in the next step anyway. >random parameters and see if correct processing emerges. In a certain sense, yes. Sounds like a genetic algorithm if I interpret that right. You still need to define "correctness" and go from the trivial to the complex. Which is... complex. Potential sensitivity hell. Still have the problem of overfitting and how to make it general enough. Your approach as such sounds okay, but I fear the messy details.
Starting point would be simple ... input of certain shapes (via "sensory stacks"), then run it through the wetwork, output would be arrangement of stacks acting as a form of "pixels" ... if the output stacks light up in a pattern similar to the input shape you trigger reward. This would be very close to the visual cortex of an insect. Yes, primitive, but it would tell you a lot about the properties required for the stacks. Extend this entity then by further downstream wetworks (e.g. emotional/memory processing for evaluation, motorcortex wetwork, etc.). Brain scans could theoretically be done at single neuron level ... but I'd rather monitor the lower layer of the neurostacks where they are connected. After all I don't care to simulate every neuron in a stack ... rather I would approach that by a noise-based "black box" approach. Oh and the most important part will likely be signal suppression ... you also need inhibitory connections between the stacks with their own distinct thresholds to suppress most of the random noise produced by the stacks on the interactome level.
Asher Cruz
Pretty gud. If you want to do it i suggest you read about the effects of it and do it somewhere at Peace like in your home when you are alone or in a nice place in the forest. Do not do it if you are heavily stressed from something happening currently in your life.
Ryan Turner
Yes, i know, i have done my reaserch on the subject.
Cooper Wood
Psychonautic is not without it's dangers. keep it cool & always stay hydrated.
sensory pathways seem to deliver a part of their information downstream for fidelity and denoise reasons also pretty interesting how quite a few hallucinations, illusions and error-issues are analogous to other forms of information processing there's interesting research on why hallucinogens lead to certain things that can be mimicked with a video camera and playing around with feedback and such while absolutely not true, I like to think of it as the first of such signals still bouncing around in a fractal manner ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486866/ >A review of abnormalities in the perception of visual illusions in schizophrenia imho also somewhat interesting, most postulate a top bottom vs bottom to top processing that leads to these drastic differences in perception, especially pertaining to visual or auditory illusions the first glowies started recruiting neuro atypical people with certain issues, certain types of schizophrenia among them
The primary neurobiological principle is not signal transmission but signal INHIBITION. Our mind, our consciousness is ultimately constantly "chiseled" out of a collection of random noise, of the mindless firing of neuronal action potentials. Playing into that axis with chemical agonists (or inhibitor antagonists ... but most drugs are agonists in the end) you can achieve very intredasting results ... in particular if we assume that in most "normal" brains inhibition is too excessive as a form of failsafe mechanism against catastrophic signal activation cascades. Btw I'll read that article with my morning coffee, too tired to fully take it up now.
don't worry just because I shared A doesn't mean I'm unaware of B imagine what kind of communication was possible if we could overcome this "you're wrong!"
Jackson Allen
What's the goal? To create an AI? Human-like (how it thinks, using familiar ways)? On the human level (capacity, can solve the same problems humans can solve, but perhaps differently)?
"Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures" might be interesting for you. b-ok.cc/s/bica
>arrangement of stacks acting as a form of "pixels" Sounds like a classical pattern recognition problem. "Soft computing" is full with approaches. Much will sound familiar to you then.
Kek, most would burn briefly but brightly. You need to run this cognition in a separate layer of your personality, otherwise it will fuck you up. Also easier to vivisect the "mind children" of these processes if you keep them neatly apart. :)
Yes, something very much along those lines. The pattern recognition would simply be an easy (and experimentally verifiable) proof of principle approach to figure out the little detail devils of the general stack and wetware architecture. Add this to morning coffee list too ... and yeah, now kinda would like to try that concept out, see if it goes somewhere. Some discussion with Nachbaranon recently brought me to a one stack / one microprocessor approach. Could maybe build the first wetwork online even.
MR BEAST LIVE NOW WITH 625000 SIMPS WATCHING - DROP REDPILLS NOW!!!!!
Nathan Smith
They meant that the English nobility are parasites. And they're right about that.
Isaac Young
hmmm why in particular too excessive inhibition? I mean, the schizophreniacs would be a good example, there's also other people who might have advantages but mostly won't. Especially with sensory habituation there's a few issues among a few atypical brain developments. Like the time it takes a person between feeling pain from just being softly stroked. I mean, in the end the goal (I've mostly read about and reminds me most of your process) is also having the stacks themselves in a similar array/matrix/connection to each other as exists in the blackboxes I also think that you don't need to map or mirror everything at least this thing doesn't have that many neurons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaphragma_mymaripenne And can do quite a lot. I have a lot of pholcidae and I'm amazed at, their abilities, or cross species cooperation between wolf spiders and humans. youtube.com/watch?v=o4VlMzv0-tM Dunno how small all this can be, but some animals really do a lot with almost nothing. The papers mentioned about psychedelic action of mind or unified theory of mind and perception deal with signal inhibition, obviously a lot.
