I don't understand.
If JEWS owned 95% of the slaves back then, why is it so hard to report on these very basic facts today?
Why hasn't a single academic historian pointed out this wild anomaly?
I don't understand.
If JEWS owned 95% of the slaves back then, why is it so hard to report on these very basic facts today?
Why hasn't a single academic historian pointed out this wild anomaly?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It was about 70% in Virginia.
Coffee or tea?
Because the academy prevents one from publishing such. What's so hard to understand?
I’m not sure this is actually true.
They were big players in the trade, and owned at higher rates than the general population. But this was probably because they were wealthier than the general population.
They typically weren’t involved in agriculture, so I doubt they owned 95% of slaves. I could be wrong.
Jews are the chosen ones, how dare you to say that they are criminals while they are.
>I could be wrong.
True.
LET ME SMELL IT LET ME SMELL IT LET ME SMELL IT
I know a guy who told me that because of slavery, he was surprised that blacks weren't slaughtering whites in the street. Now imagine if he applied that logic to the people who sat at the top of the slave trade. Imagine, given the recent flash of black on Jewish hate crimes, what blacks would do if they found out not only that Jews are MORE complicit than whites but they have been lying, and controlling blacks to further that lie, about it this whole time.
Coffee good?
>why is it so hard to report on these very basic facts today?
Who owns the media outlets that can report this?
The answer should answer your original question.
>Why hasn't a single academic historian pointed out this wild anomaly?
They have... Where did you think the claim came from?
No, they were disproportionately involved. I don't know if they owned 95% of the slaves but they operated the slave trade.
>Jews owned 95% of slaves back then.
lmao unless you count huge mining companies no jew did not own the most slaves
When's the last time an academic Historian has pointed out ANYTHING about ANYTHING to ANYBODY?
focus on the insurance industry regarding slaves
>unless you count huge mining companies
Why would you not count them?
That's like saying, "unless you count blondes, hardly any human have yellow hair, LOL!"
if the slave owners were jews without an american identity then why did this God fearing christian secede
who held title? a lot of the slaves were purchased on loan
I could be wrong but I *highly* doubt it.
Holy shit literally made for bbc
>why is it so hard to report on these very basic facts today?
Read the bottom part of the image
Who cares slaver.
>12 ships
theres alot more niggers then that
try harder nigger
>tfw
Because Yas Forums has to make shit up so their crackpot ideas sound good
>If blacks commit 50% of crime in the US, why is it so hard to report on these very basic facts today?
They have, two Jewish historians in particular.
imagine the taste
They probably have, but when kikes own or indirectly control pretty much all of the info in msm, it doesn't matter. They just drown it out, and if they can't do that, they start demonizing, and if the person is still alive and neither works, then weird suicides happen.
are you telling me the jews started the civil war because they owned the south and wanted slaves? yeah the math dosent add up
Is porn good for you?
based
>Why hasn't a single academic historian pointed out this wild anomaly?
the only reason you know this information is because many academic historian HAVE pointed it out.
Yeah stick with the stat about them being slave merchants. Kikes aren’t primarily farmers.... they don’t work the land... that’s for goys. If you stick to Jewish slave ships bringing them over, that’s a point you can win.
Nobody discusses the Muslim slave trade either tho
They didn't build ships to transport them all in one go, it happened over decades. But if you're so sure of yourself name a few of the non-jew ships then.
Slave trading has been the jewish chosen profession for years, even more so than banking. That's where the Slavs got their names from. The jews kidnapped and enslaved them so much that the word Slav began to mean what we now understand as "slave".
They control schools and the colleges. Who do you think is making all that cash off the debt interest? It’s a scam and a brainwash.
Anyone who stands up against (((them))) has their career destroyed.
We were doing so well having a discussion till you showed up
youtube.com
hhhhHHHWWWWOOOOoOoOoUEYEUEUEUEH
HHHHWWWWAAAAAAAAIIIIEEIIYYYYY
>Imagine, given the recent flash of black on Jewish hate crimes, what blacks would do if they found out not only that Jews are MORE complicit than whites but they have been lying, and controlling blacks to further that lie, about it this whole time.
This angle should be exploited by us more...
Strop trying to blame jews. Everybody knows that peasant Europeans escaping famine came to USA with nothing but the clothes on their backs and immediately took over the banks, cotton mills, plantations, slave ships and slave markets.
We discuss it, and also point out that the muds had their slaves castrated.
youtube.com
HHWOOOOIIIIYNNNNG HWWWWWEEEEIIIIIIEEEEEEH
Women have 10 good years.
Im just saying what were all thinking faggot.
Yup. Ottomans literally raided Iceland and Ireland and took slaves. They also beheaded hundreds of thousands of Eastern Europeans and possibly even more were taken as slaves
too bad bbc is a myth like the holocaust
Because you would be an antisemite
The jew uses its profits from the slave trade to hire people to write history books that favor the jew.
In other words, exactly the same then as it is now. The jew runs CNN, MSJewBC, etc., to cover up their child sex slave rings like Epstein.
They try but the information always gets suppressed and labeled anti-semimimistic. Professor Tony Martin (black dude / honorary aryan) did some interesting talks on the subject. But because the info came from some Muslim sources it's too easy for smoothbrains to write it off as biased. Now, I ackowledge that mudslimes are liars sometimes, but just as often they're just reacting wrong to true events. For example, Aaron Lopez. He was a Jewish "philanthropist" but has also been demonstrated to have owned slaving companies. Does this info get treated as a genuine concern? No, the reaction is consistently "fuck off tinfoil take your meds".
The point is, there are people trying to point this out, but they will be suppressed by weaponised silence, or just totally discredited via ad homs, because jews will always deflect. Like the Leo Frank case, where a Jew killed a 13 year old white girl and tried to frame a couple of innocent nogs for the crime.
Anyway, if anything I've given you a source to begin inquiry into the subject.
since nobody will see this and thread will be deleted, i must confess that i have a literal fetish to serve as a toilet slave to women
Why do you say that? because you want to believe it? Whats your source
>Myth
Please do I want to see how it backfires when blacks realize whiteys WERE the ones behind the slave trade after all
Based.
They started the slave trade