Satoshi Uematsu killed 19 mentally disabled patients in Japan. His reasoning was:
> In his letter and in statements made after turning himself in, Uematsu explained that he was "saving from unhappiness" both the severely disabled and those who he believed were burdened with maintaining their lives.[24][26]
The disabled were a burden on society and their families. Was it right to do what he did?
>when u read about charlie manson
yes but he forgot to kill you too op
tfw a jap didnt save you from unhappiness
Did nothing wrong
theres a house full of adult retards in my town and they're always out picking up trash everywhere. like every single day. local businesses give them free shit, i worked in a bowling ally and they would come in every week and pay like 20 cents a game. they always seemed happy except for one of them who would always pick up the disconnected payphone and scream into it. i remember him having an especially bad day and started smashing the receiver into his face until he started bleeding everywhere though. i imagine they fuck each other like rabbits too. so i dont really see how their lives of blissful ignorance and child like understanding of the world would keep them from being happy. quite the opposite really
He was a pervert who took sexual pleasure from murdering and justified it after the fact.
Both of these
He's a hero and did the right thing, in japan they abandon all their retards and its shameful to even admit they have someone retarded in their family. That guy saw the truth and did what nobody else was going to do, now those retards are free from suffering and also their family who are unapologetic to what he did but also secretly are happy and free from burden
>The disabled were a burden on society and their families. Was it right to do what he did?
Explain your axioms for establishing what is 'right'.
Based, I hate retards.
>"saving from unhappiness"
So 99,98% of humanity should be killed
seems reasonable
but why did he decide to take this task upon himself? Unless he had some sort of prior connection to those he killed, and really saw them suffering, it sounds like he is trying to dress up sadism with the garments of mercy and altruism.
nah japan needs to get a heart and keep their disabled alive. i don't support it,.
fucking gross
if i'm ever like that, some of you need to put me to rest
i'm trusting you m8s
Why are japs so based?
It should have been their own families to do it, not a stranger.
>Was it right to do what he did?
he's got no right to decide. civilized socities have something called law. if he's so upset about disabled people, he could petition the government to cut funding for their care or legalize euthanasia for severely disabled people.
anyone else think he's a really handsome dude? he looks on par with jpop idols. he could have gotten a cute gf and lived happily.
he also created bitcoin.
He did the right thing. The severely disabled will never contribute anything throughout their lives, only be a burden on both state and family. They are a dead end, and are suffering in ways we wouldn't allow animals to. If anything he did wrong, it was stabbing; euthanasia is the most humane method, but it's not like he had such access.
Pillow over the face works pretty well
This.
Everyone here is responsible
>one of them who would always pick up the disconnected payphone and scream into it.
holy based
plotwist:
Law is made by goverment
goverment is people
Uematsu is people
there's mostly always happy and much better people than at least 50% of the population. they are a burden but they're job creators so are important.
Very difficult. If I somehow could really know that he experienced no joy or pleasure from killing them then, yes, I would say he was right.
user. You're socially disabled and a burden to society. Should we kill you?
Babies are a burden to society should we kill them?
Men and Women who lose their jobs are for a time a burden to society should we kill them?
It's a stupid retarded faggot argument and I'd expect a fucking soulless Yayoi jap to make it and a SWEDE to perpetuate it.
>The disabled were a burden on society and their families.
But he say he did it to save them, not for society or their families. BUT I can't really know whether those people were truly unhappy, or if there was no hope for them, or if he was just a serial killer finding an excuse to murder. I just hope they are in a better place.