I don’t get this holocaust denial thing

This is a legitimately very good rebuttal. I don't think it even really requires any elaboration. The scale of this operation would have people who snitched, especially during the Cold War. Why wouldn't they?

Jimmy Saville likely raped thousands of children, and hundreds went to the police. Statistically, the idea that no one snitched is ridiculous. The burden of proof has to be on deniers to even address why this would somehow never come out, not to address the lack of any physical evidence.

Statistics are not a fallacy, so you could link to something that's not another opinion post, dude. A blogger wouldn't verify their argument with an anonymous blog post. You have to be qualified/have evidence.

That thread is full of sources. I suggest you read it, rabbi.
>archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/243717229/
Holy shit, the Germans really were a 300 IQ master race to pull off this comicbook supervillain-tier shit.

Attached: prince of persia.jpg (696x783, 112.24K)

This.

>The scale of this operation would have people who snitched, especially during the Cold War. Why wouldn't they?
Who? The russians? You think anyone in a position to snitch lived long?

>The burden of proof has to be on deniers to even address why this would somehow never come out
Who would listen? Do you expect to hear about it in the papers? in the media? in books?
>Statistics are not a fallacy
Statistics can be made to say whatever you want them to say.
>You have to be qualified/have evidence.
That's retarded at best. You're only using it here because it benefits your argument. I could list things that you take for granted as true without any statistical evidence for days.

>THOUSANDS died
>HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS starved to death
>MILLIONS were burned alive in ovens
>6 MILLION lost...
it'll be 100 million by next year

Do you even know e.g. how Anne Frank actually died? Pic related.

The US had their own interment camps for US Japanese.

Jews died. From best we can now tell around 300,000.

There was no large scale extermination. The gas chambers are obviously a lie.

The deaths were via starvation and typus (what Anne Frank herself died of in April 1945 at the end of the war).

Germans could not feed and provide material for themselves, much less their jew POWs. The same thing would have happened to the US japaneese POWs had the US mainland came under such massive duress.

When you are shown pictures of the dead jews the allies found at the end of the war, those are typus (mostly) and starvation victims. Gassing does not somehow magically make you emaciated and skinny.

Their emaciation clearly indicates they were kept alive for as long as possible.

They were treated extremely well (by POW standards) until the last months of the war, when Germany was cut off from material and fuel due to allied bombing and the two fronts closing in. When they couldn't even take care of their own citizens, of course the POWs were going to get the worst of it.

e.g like it was pointed out above, Anne Frank (a child) was still alive until April 1945, literally weeks before the end of the war, and she died of the TYPHUS outbreak that plagued Germany throughout the war. Even the jews have to admit this now. And her father survived the camp... living until 1980, becoming wealthy telling her daughter's "story".

It's a shame Germans didn't take precautions to prevent the typhus outbreak that plagued Germany thoughout the war... e.g. disinfecting the camps with the primary typhus treatment at the time, the pesticide Zyklon B which kills the insect that causes typhus, and burning typhus diseased corpses and clothing etc. like the British did when they liberated her camp.

Oh wait...

Attached: burned bc typhus af.jpg (1710x921, 436.35K)

I live in Britain and I didn't see anyone who wasn't a white Christian until I was 11 because I live in a poor white area. I'm not part of the "agenda". Don't be fucking dumb.

Evidence isn't retarded. It's part of proof and evidence.

And yes, I think people in a position to snitch lived long. There have been lots of Nazi generals who took sole personal responsibility for what happened and not one ever mentioned any of these events, even in the many extended interviews. Some are still alive. Why wouldn't they confirm it?

>It's a shame Germans didn't take precautions to prevent the typhus outbreak that plagued Germany throughout the war
>Oh wait...
EVERY major camp was found to have Zyklon B on site (due to the typhus plague), both the USSR captured "extermination camps" and the US captured non-extermination camps.

Pic: jews initially claimed all 30+ POW camps were "extermination camps".

Then every camp captured by the US showed zero evidence of "extermination chambers" or any other form of systematic mass killing.

ONLY the Soviets claimed they found evidence of large scale gas chamber killing... after refusing outside investigators for years... and after (now admittedly) RECONSTRUCTING the camps.

What a coincidence.

Soviet reconstructions and other lies exposed, ON SITE, here:

bitchute.com/video/TMQ1cEudc2Yg/

Up until 1945, Allied propaganda claimed that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were "extermination camps", but not for long. Soon US troops saw the truth for themselves. Well respected American historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote:

"These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in those camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed" (Rampart Journal, Summer 1967).

What had happened was that honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had indeed died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence at all of "gas chambers". As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to be known as the "extermination camps" in the holocaust mythos, although no western observers were permitted to see them until years later.

Attached: camps then now.jpg (943x750, 364.5K)

>watch him recoil
I'm sure, my (((fellow white person))).
>EVERY major camp was found to have Zyklon B on site (due to the typhus plague)
Zyklon B (a bug spray) is a piss-poor method of trying to kill people. In fact Zyklon-B was manufactured NOT to kill people. Zyklon-B is liquid hydrogen cyanide (HCN has a boiling point of 26ºC or 78ºF) infused into an inert substance like diatomaceous earth or wood chips. Hot air blowers are needed to vaporize the HCN. Talk of Zyklon-B being dumped into a gas chamber and people dying within minutes is physically impossible.

And why would the Germans use something as inefficient as Zyklon-B when they had 12,500 TONS of human killing Tabun nerve gas just sitting around unused?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabun_(nerve_agent)

Leading holocaust authority Dr. Franciszek Piper about why there was so little Zyklon B residue in the walls of the locations alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau (far less than would be necessary to kill humans). Needless to say Piper's reply was contradictory and evasive. Fortunately for those individuals interested in real history, David Cole's camera was rolling at the time and Piper's reply was captured for posterity.

Here are the segments of the interview concerned with the Zyklon B residue:

bitchute.com/video/TMQ1cEudc2Yg/

The Zyklon B typhus pesticide tested on humans:

bitchute.com/video/pw2bSkCx60OO/

Fun fact: The US used Zyklon B on the US-Mexican border for decades... yet jews catch a whiff and die by the millions. Makes one think.
>The fumigation was carried out in an area of the building that American officials called, ominously enough, "the gas chambers." An article written in a German scientific journal in 1938 specifically praised the El Paso method of fumigating Mexican immigrants with Zyklon B

npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5176177

Attached: mexicans zyklon b.jpg (1580x601, 342.61K)

Okay, so you guys are all discussing the idea that the numbers are all whack, but the government literally killed Jewish people for being a religious and ethnic minority. Can you not see any reason people would not report this to the government? Why they would not list themselves publicly as Jewish during the Holocaust? Do you not see any reason people would do that?

"Work will set you free."

These weren't just concentration camps. You wouldn't just gas someone outright when you wanted them to work or provide labour. Or what do you suppose "work will set you free" meant?

The state of bodies overworked and starved doesn't discount the overwhelming lack of evidence for a claim that supposedly involved millions of co-conspirators.

You think that because people changed their minds about an attack that had all the documents burned by the people who coordinated it, and details were revised, that there is a larger conspiracy and not just coverups at work? The Battle of the Okinawa has an estimated 10,000 American rapes of Japanese women, but the history acknowledges America's good intentions on the island. Can you not accept some historical nuance instead of presupposing there is a conspiracy at work?

I know it feels like you're going against the grain, but you're just going with the grain that makes you feel safe. Think for yourself.

>Evidence isn't retarded. It's part of proof and evidence.
And yet you require it so little in so many other aspects of your life.

>And yes, I think people in a position to snitch lived long.
and who would they tell? Who in russia would listen? Who outside of russia would listen, would risk their reputation to take just the empty words of another to print?

> There have been lots of Nazi generals who took sole personal responsibility for what happened
Yes, after significant torture and threats to their surviving family.

Where are the orders for the camps? Surely they would have been encrypted in some fashion because of the severity of the actions? Oh wait, we had the enigma machines and we intercepted nearly all of their transmissions.

Where are the orders?

>What had happened was that honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had indeed died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence at all of "gas chambers". As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to be known as the "extermination camps" in the holocaust mythos, although no western observers were permitted to see them until years later.

Attached: no gas - germans tortured.jpg (1024x616, 129.62K)

Attached: no gas chambers rc.png (756x940, 839.9K)

Attached: red cross findings.jpg (641x5212, 1.8M)

Jews are not inferior because Jews are not human.

Jews are inter-dimensional spawns of satan here to make cattle of the people who could branch out to all of the stars and bring peace and hope to the universe.

Whatevur guy. I grew up in Liverpool, the shithole, piss-poor and white as fuck part of Britain. I've literally met 2 Jewish people in my entire life.

Weird how you assume I live my life without requiring evidence for the things I do. Who the fuck ends up on pol being a fucking normie?

And right now? Literally everyone on this board is listening. But these people didn't write letters to their family about it, journals, private books, nothing. Not one of them tried to say anything. It's statistically impossible. If 100s of kids tried to snitch on Jimmy Saville, a British TV star who raped thousands of children, then statistically there's no way no one has said anything about the holocaust when it involved MILLIONS. What you're talking about is statistically IMPOSSIBLE. You're saying that hundreds of thousands of people who "knew the truth" were completely silent and didn't leave the truth anywhere, based on census records of a discriminated minority in a dictatorship.

>the numbers are all whack
True. Makes me think.
>The perpetually changing number of alleged dead at Auschwitz
9,000,000 Cited by the French documentary Night and Fog, which has been shown to millions of school students worldwide.

8,000,000 The French War Crime Research Office, Doc. 31, 1945.

7,000,000 The Nuremberg Trial.

7,000,000 Also cited by the French War Crime Research Office.

6,000,000 Cited in the book “Auschwitz Doctor” by Miklos Nyiszli. It has since been proven that this book is a fraud and the "doctor" was never even at Auschwitz, even though the book is often cited by historians.

5,000,000 to 5,500,000 Cited in 1945 at the trial of Auschwitz commander Rudolf Hoess, based on his “confession” which was written in English, a language he never spoke.

5,000,000 Cited on April 20, 1978 by the French daily, Le Monde. Also cited on January 23, 1995 by the German daily Die Welt. By September 1, 1989, Le Monde reduced the figure to 1,433,000.

4,500,000 In 1945 this figure was cited by another witness at the aforementioned Hoess trial.

4,000,000 Cited by a Soviet document of May 6, 1945. This figure was also reported in The New York Times on April 18, 1945, although 50 years later on January 26, 1995 (see below), The New York Times and The Washington Post slashed the figure to 1,500,000 citing new findings by the Auschwitz Museum officials. In fact, the figure of 4,000,000 was later repudiated by the Auschwitz museum officials in 1990 (see below) but the figure of 1,500,000 victims was not formally announced by Polish President Lech Walesa until five years after the Auschwitz historians had first announced their discovery.

Attached: Nuremberg Trial Lies.jpg (1790x948, 366.62K)

3,500,000 Cited in the 1991 edition of the Dictionary of the French Language and by Claude Lanzmann in 1980 in his introduction to Filip Muller's book, “Three Years in an Auschwitz Gas Chamber.”

3,000,000 Cited in a forced confession by Rudolf Hoess, the Auschwitz commander who said this was the number of those who had died at Auschwitz prior to Dec. 1, 1943. Later cited in the June 7, 1993 issue of Heritage, the most widely read Jewish newspaper in California, even though three years previously the authorities at the Auschwitz museum had scaled down the figure to a minimum of 1,100,000 and a maximum of 1,500,000. (see below).

2,500,000 Cited by a famous "witness to the Holocaust," Rudolf Vrba, when he testified on July 16, 1981 for the Israeli government's war crimes trial of former SS official Adolf Eichmann.

2,000,000 Cited by no less than three famous Holocaust historians, including Leon Poliakov (1951) writing in “Harvest of Hate”; Georges Wellers, writing in 1973 in “The Yellow Star at the Time of Vichy”; and Lucy Dawidowicz, writing in 1975 in “The War Against the Jews.”

2,000,000 to 4,000,000 Cited by Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer in 1982 in his book, “A History of the Holocaust.” However, by 1989 Bauer revised his figures and determined that the actual number was lower: 1,600,000.

1,600,000 This is a 1989 revision by Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer of his earlier figure in 1982 of 2,000,000 to 4,000,000, Bauer cited this new figure on September 22, 1989 in The Jerusalem Post, at which time he wrote' 'The larger figures have been dismissed for years, except that it hasn't reached the public yet."

Attached: 8 million.jpg (1278x981, 394.36K)

1,500,000 In 1995 this was the “official" number of Auschwitz deaths announced by Polish President Lech Walesa as determined by the historians at the Auschwitz museum. This number was inscribed on the monument at the Auschwitz camp at that time, thereby "replacing" the earlier 4,000,000 figure that had been formally repudiated (and withdrawn from the monument) five years earlier in 1990. At that time, on July 17, 1990 The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph citing the "new" figure of 1,500,000 that had been determined by the authorities at the Auschwitz museum. This new figure was reported two years later in a UPI report published in the New York Post on March 26, 1992. On January 26, 1995 both The Washington Post and The New York Times cited this 1,500,000 figure as the new "official" figure (citing the Auschwitz Museum authorities).

1,471,595 This is a 1983 figure cited by historian Georges Wellers who (as noted previously) had determined, writing in 1973, that some 2,000,000 had died. In his later calculation, Wellers decided that of the 1,471,595 who had died at Auschwitz, 1,352,980 were Jews.

1,433,000 This figure was cited on September 1, 1989 by the French daily, Le Monde, which earlier, on April 20, 1978, had cited the figure at 4,000,000.

1,250,000 In 1985, historian Raul Hilberg arrived at this figure in his book, “The Destruction of the European Jews.” According to Hilberg, of those dead, some 1,000,000 were Jews.

Attached: 4.jpg (647x442, 62.25K)

1,100,000 to 1,500,000 Sources for this estimate are historians Yisrael Gutman and Michael Berenbaum (later of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum) in their 1984 book, “Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp”; also Dr. Franciszek Piper, the curator of the Auschwitz Museum, writing a chapter in that book. This estimate was later also cited by Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, writing in The Washington Post on September 8, 1998. The upper figure of 1,500,000 thus remains the "official" figure as now inscribed at Auschwitz, with the earlier figure of 4,000,000 having been removed from the memorial at the site of the former concentration camp.

1,000,000 Jean-Claude Pressac, writing in his 1989 book “Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers.” This is interesting since he wrote his book to repudiate so-called "Holocaust deniers" who were called that precisely because they had questioned the numbers of those who had died at Auschwitz.

900,000 Reported on August 3, 1990 11, by Aufbau, a Jewish newspaper in New York.

800,000 to 900,000 Reported by Gerald Reitlinger in his 1953 book, “The Final Solution.” This figure is notable, considering the fact that it reduces the Auschwitz death total from the 4,000,000 figure that was widely in vogue in 1953.

Attached: 1.5.jpg (640x466, 75.18K)

775,000 to 800,000 Jean-Claude Pressac's revised figure, put forth in his 1993 book, “The Crematoria of Auschwitz: The Mass Murder's Machinery”, scaling down the figure from Pressac's 1989 claim of 1,000,000 dead. At this juncture, Pressac said that of the new number, 630,000 were Jews.

630,000 to 710,000 In 1994 Pressac scaled his figure down somewhat further; this is the figure cited in the German language translation of Pressac's 1993 book originally published in French. Again, this is substantially less than Pressac's 1989 figure of 1,000,000.

73,137 This figure was reported in The New York Times on March 3, 1991 and was based entirely on the wartime German concentration camp records that had been captured by the Soviets and just recently released. According to this figure, of those dead, 38,031 were Jews. These records state that the total of all persons who died in the ENTIRE German prison camp system from 1935 to 1945 were 403,713. To repeat: a total of 403,713 persons of all races and religions was officially recorded to have died (of all causes. typhus, old age, measles, etc.-and execution) in the entire prison camp system over a 10 year period. Of those 403,713 a total of 73,137 died at Auschwitz. Of those 73,137 who died at Auschwitz, 38,031 were Jews.

Attached: admit making up numbers.jpg (906x625, 214.29K)

Jews aren't inferior, however the jews who rule over you are. Inferior in terms of empathy and character.

>Weird how you assume I live my life without requiring evidence for the things I do.
Oh okay. Please post the statistical evidence that shows it's safe for you to drive to work/commute to work. Be sure to post an accredited source.

>Literally everyone on this board is listening.
and literally everyone who would have witnessed it is dead or so old they can't really use Yas Forums and again, what would it possibly matter? nobody here would believe him and even if they did it wouldn't change a fucking thing.

The difference between jimmy and this is that jimmy did not have trillions of dollars and the media at their beck and call to silence anything about it.

Again, show us the orders. Shouldn't there be a bajillion copies of the orders for mass genocide assuming such an order was ever given?

>They were treated extremely well (by POW standards)
What was life really like at the Auschwitz "extermination camp"?

Auschwitz "holocaust survivor" jews interviews, in their own words... watch this.

bitchute.com/video/KiwHozAsw1Il/

Orchestras

Painting

Sports

Hospitals

Nurseries

Ballet

Beer

Movie theaters

etc.

Was it a jew "extermination camp"? Or a POW camp where people died towards the end of the war due to starvation and disease?

Attached: 'death camp' births.jpg (1233x774, 292.08K)

People need to do some research into WW1 and Weimar Germany (i.e. jew Germany, Germany between the wars).
>First trannies and sex change operations
>Communist hotbed
>Frankfurt School was founded there
Jewish domination of Weimar Germany part 1
bitchute.com/video/LwxrhCwg8HyR/

Jewish domination of Weimar Germany part 2
bitchute.com/video/d03WXCCV6pyj/

Weimar Republic: The jewish Babylon
bitchute.com/video/DXhip5NYiwpf/

Berlin, Sin City of Weimar Germany
bitchute.com/video/iB6iBh4Ktmv0/

"Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin" in PDF form:
legiochristi.com/static/lit/Voluptuous_Panic.pdf

Basically jews sabotaged Germany during WW1 and started a civil war among many other things (see above videos), and continued their anti-indigenous-German subversion through the 20's and early 30's until Hitler took power. Jews were repeatedly asked to leave the country all through the 30's, most famously under the Haavara agreement.

After WW2 was under way, the jews that had refused to leave were put into camps, just like the Japanese-Americans the US put into camps. They were seen (rightfully) as a security risk. They were treated well by POW standards, better than the US treated the Japanese. See: Typhus was a major problem in the early 20th century. See: and The camps were riddled with typhus (a disease spread by lice, hence ALL the camps having Zyklon B on site, it's a pesticide. See: ) and eventually as the war turned against Germany (24/7 bombings by the allies, invasions on 3 fronts, food and material supplies cut-off etc.) you saw a lot of disease and starvation in the camps... just like you saw in the German civilian population and what you would have saw in the US camps had the US come under such duress.

Attached: weimar war declared 1933.jpg (1540x852, 479.88K)