I saw this fucker posted here once and it seems that a lot of you fags loved him...

Posting in a data gathering thread!

Attached: 1587037063409.jpg (728x545, 104.98K)

He was executed by lethal injection.
>durrrr

>i'm a lefty
what does this even mean

>say this dude posted here once
>Timothy McVeigh
>arrested in 90’s
>Yas Forums didn’t come around till 2000’s
Room temperature IQ detected

168:1 kill ratio

Hello agent. How is this evening's fishing trip going? Just to let you know there is no Militia or alt righters on this Soman yahtzee enthusiast board. I hate to inform you of this but I feel it's only fair so you don't waste your time or federal resources .

I am a person of the left-wing political persuasion. McVeigh was pretty right-wing. I'm just saying I'm not some deranged fanboy of him, or here trying to defend him cuz I'm a right-wing radical. Just trying to provide a sober and unbiased analysis of him, his ideas, what he did.

His handler chose the Mcmurrah building specifically because it had a daycare in it
Theres no real way McVeigh could have come up with the target on his own it's too specific and in the middle of nowhere, it also just happened to be the FBI office where they were keeping the evidence for the investigation into Hillary for something that escapes me at the moment

Are you guys really this stupid or are you some Squatemalans who don't understand English?

i just wonder what a rational "lefty" sounds like today... the only thing we are told about "lefties" is that they are all kooky communists... curious what your ideology is as a "lefty".. care to elaborate at all? i don't want to discuss it really, i'm just curious what you have to say

Nigger you are functionally retarded.

He’s saying that he saw him posted here once, not that he saw him post here once.

He killed a lot of innocent people, which is not good. But without his actions there would have been absolutely no justice served for the feds burning down a church full of families in Waco. The justice system sucks at holding itself accountable.

>Theres no real way McVeigh could have come up with the target on his own it's too specific and in the middle of nowhere
Do you guys just make shit up?
The target was in a state capital.

>In the middle of nowhere

It's in the middle of one of the largest cities of the Midwest. Like almost exactly in the center of the city.

Yeah sure dude, I'm a libertarian lefty. Not an anarchist, but a pretty "radical" libertarian by any objective measure, I guess. I don't believe in statism. That means I don't believe in landlords, banks, usury, mortgages. Not big into the police, I think they're all corrupt monsters. I don't support gun control (something McVeigh was angry about, if I remember right). I hate corporate America. I think we have a compulsory economic system which ultimately amounts to just slavery.

On taxes, which is something else McVeigh hated, I mean IDK, I can see both sides. On the one hand I can understand "taxation is theft", but I don't think you can realistically advocate for abolishing or reducing taxes in the context of a highly statist government (where the govt is protecting unmitigated and unrestrained private property for the rich. Private empires for the rich. Banks. Landlords. Ect). So I'm kind of warm and sympathetic towards welfare states for all practical purposes, even if I don't really think they're ideal

I basically think there should be some sort of limit on how much you can own. Doesn't have to be a low limit. It can be a high limit. Maybe someone can have a billion dollars. Maybe half a billion (in assets, obviously). But at some point there has to be a limit.

And with corporations, IDK they can get fucked for all I care. I also, for example, don't think that thefts from big corporations (like Walmart, for example) should be prosecuted. Or actually, I don't even really think it should be illegal. Because why should the state expend resources to protect that much property for one person or group of people? Why is the state protecting these massive private empires?

IDK what else, Julian Assange is my hero?

But I did witness him post here back in the day

Statement is impossible because Yas Forums was created right after this dude was executed in Indiana.

I'm big into free speech, too, which is a hot issue today that not too many people want to genuinely defend

He was a dancing cat, but he chose the wrong moves.

>libertarian
>limits on personal property/wealth
>and shoplifting should be legal
So in other words you're internally incoherent

Have you looked into national socialism?

>this fucker posted here once
wtf I hate sanity now

Attached: hatecraft.png (288x300, 43.47K)

Yeah why do you see any contradiction in that? It's the state that exists your private property. It exists because of statism. Libertarianism is generally associated with a rejection of statism. So obviously as a libertarian I believe in some limitation on private property. It's a limit on how much property the state is going to expend its resources and commit violence against people in order to protect for an individual or group.

What is contradictory about that? I don't understand it? Unless when you think of libertarians you think of right-wing libertarians. Which is a different group of people. Not every libertarian is right wing

a small thermal exhaust port just below the main port, the shaft is ray shielded so you'll have to use ryder trucks. good luck, and may the force be with you.

This shit is so simple, in (((their))) state, we are 100% full libertarian so they don't fuck us completely, in 4th Reich we would obviously allow the state to do its thing because it could actually do quite good. Simple as

Feds' kids fried real good too :)

Lol yes user, I've "looked into" national socialism. Obviously. Plus I am on Yas Forums so obviously I am well acquainted. I would suggest you reject national socialism wholly. It's a horrible ideology that can only end horribly for all of mankind, including the people / racial group favored by the national socialism.

All I will say is that I don't support the left's newfound positions on racial politics. I don't support the ID politicking and pandering. I also don't support the unmitigated open borders that exist to provide cheap labor for corporate America. All of that is a sham. The classically lefty position, up until really just a few years ago, was to be against illegal immigration and to recognize it as an evil Republican ploy funded by megacorporations. And I would suggest any anons to recognize that is actually still the reality, despite the change in rhetoric. It is the capitalist profit motive that creates illegal immigration, and thus Republicans will never fix it because they prize business interests and the capitalist profit motive above all else. Obviously even including over human life with the whole new "die for wall st" thing

Attached: trump legal immigration.png (600x528, 275.4K)

You're against the state but want the state to enforce the confiscation and redistribution of personal property.

>nothing ever happens
>nobody ever does anything
>if someone did do something, they didn't really do it
>if they did do it, it was only because they were an intelligence asset
>if they weren't an intelligence asset, it was because they were MKULTRA mind controlled into doing it
>if something did happen, it was fake and CGI
>if it wasn't CGI, it was mossad
>if it wasn't mossad, it was a false flag by someone else
>if it wasn't a false flag, it didn't happen and the victims are crisis actors
i'm so fucking sick of you people

But who's on first