Is there a religion that's objectively true? No metal gymnastics about metaphors

Is there a religion that's objectively true? No metal gymnastics about metaphors.

Attached: dtDVsbA.gif (261x397, 1.78M)

Other urls found in this thread:

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk
youtu.be/EImiTAtJWdE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

What is objectively true? How can you know for sure?

Define objectively true. Like, you look up in the sky and see "God was here" written in the clouds?

Buddhism I guess? At least without the versions that have God's or say that everyone is god

oldie but a goldie
>she has some rocking tits

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk

Traditional Catholicism

Obviously the vedic ones. How can agelet religions even compete?

Gassing kikes

Islam

Cosmotheism

Attached: William-Pierce-portrait.jpg (680x931, 47.84K)

Objectively true in as logically consistent. falsifiable yet not falsified, proven results, etc.

my cult

>No metal gymnastics

Attached: 1533677740629.jpg (992x744, 69.72K)

>rationalwiki

Attached: 1567629902229.png (454x520, 10.66K)

Many religions contain truth. Objective truth is subjective. It is objectively subjective.

>rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk
>dilationwiki

Fuck this place. I’m making a reddit account.

But what makes a religion true? The existence of the God that is a part of it?

Your tranny cult is hard and lumpy, my mind control cult is soft and luxurious

Which god?

No there isn't. Religion, by definition, is a matter of faith, not fact.

who is this semen demon?

x is x user

Attached: Ayn_Rand_quote,_American_Adventure,_Epcot_Center,_Walt_Disney_World.jpg (1920x1163, 135.7K)

He means no hoops to jump through, and no cognitive dissonance

Christianity

>thinking logic even applies.
user... you have much to understand.

This, The church was established 2000 years ago

Veronica Vermont. she review old tech and demo data transmission equipments on YT

Who is this Shaft Shaman?

So you're saying relgion is illogical and me trying to understand it is me not getting it?

Religion is about co-existence, not truth. Why do you think people as early as Epicurus managed to dismantle it's from the logic angle so easily: Is god willing to prevent evil, then...

Attached: 670fa38685ac3d9514fa440f1b7c0644-1000.jpg (1778x1000, 150.86K)

Objective means that the truth lies in the object and not the person observing it. Therefore whichever religion is right is "objectively true", you just don't know which one that is.

Yes, christianity

I'm asking you. I don't know what you mean by "I want to know if a religion is true." Proven results, logically consistent... you could argue that these things are produced by a religion if you wanted to. Or not. So those are not the outcomes you need to be judging the truth of. In my mind, what would make a religion "true" is if the deity who is spoken about is undoubtedly real. As in, he/she/it appeals to one of your five senses somehow.

>Sun god worshippers

Technically they were correct, the sun does give us life!

For the Christian anons
youtu.be/EImiTAtJWdE

All I know is that christians for instance pick and choose things from the bible and claim because they're in the bible they must be true, but the bible itself is contradictory. Even with chapters that were taken out of the bible specifically for that reason.

No.

Objectively true, no.

But religion contains some ideas that taken together are a net benefit to society. I'm an atheist but it's clear that some religious ideas while not objectively true have some clear benefit.

While we shouldn't mix or confuse metaphorical truth with objective truth, it doesn't mean that metaphorical truth is worthless, there's still value in that. The debates between Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris touched on this idea, and they used a loaded gun analogy which I thought made the point really clearly.