the truth is that most women would LOVE to be stay-at-home moms and homemakers but they simply are not afforded the opportunity. the average "man" doesnt earn enough money to support a stay-at-home mom which means women are forced to work and focus on their careers instead of raising children. if you want women to return to their "traditional" role of stay-at-home mom and homemaker then men need to return to their traditional role of breadwinner.
simple as.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Nice blog post you fucking retard.
>wants to be a stay-at-home mom
>has 100k in student loan debt
what did she mean by this?
lmao
Why is Mr. Kushner (Mnuchin, Kudlow, Wolf, etc.) bringing in hundreds of thousands of temporary visa workers and giving out 1.2 million green cards per year if he expects Americans to have single income households?
>most women
want to be acounting free whores.
Maybe we could if them working didn't mean a ~100% inflated labor pool.
>women would love to be trad stay at home mums
>posts pic of naked roastie with apron
all women under 25 prostitute themselves in some way. It's really the fault of guys who send women $200 dollars to send them a snapchat or something.
hard to make enough to be bread winner when wages are despressed by half the workforce being women or low iq shitskins, the diversity hire tokenism of which also artificially limits advancement as well. i have seen countless team leaders in numerous factories who by merit should have been fired but their sista gal works in HR so they act as turds clogging the shitter of progress.
Men will never earn enough money to support a stay at home wife if the wives won't stay the fuck at home. Immigrants in the work force depress wages, but women in the workforce goddamn well DOUBLES its size and depresses wages even further.
With fewer available in the workforce jobs will have to become more competitive and offering higher wages is a suitable means to compete for better workers.
When women stood up for rights they lost their seat. If they want to be able to sit down, they need to actually sit the fuck down and stay there. Can't have it both ways.
And Neither can men.
pardon me for pointing out the obvious hipocrisy of Yas Forumstards ragging on women for not getting married when they refuse to get a real job
My husband could afford it (and I was a house wife for 3 years) but he constantly bitched about it because he resented me being able to spend time with the kids, instead of taking pride in providing for his family. What went wrong with society?
Chill with the antisemitism big guy
at least she is in the kitchen
The sad thing is it isn't even a domination and subservience thing; I genuinely want to bring resources to a woman who curates and drives a home.
>flood the labor market with 2x the amount of workers but making women work
>women vote for more immigration and illegals to compete for jobs
>wages plummet
>women are literally gifted high paying position because they have a gash
Women really are the niggers of gender
Stop racking up student loan debt and stay the fuck out of the workforce and then the average man will be able to support you on their average wages.
Audible kek
This. Never pay a woman to do something she should only be doing for her husband for free.
But the average man DOES earn enough money. It just happens that the average man cannot earn enough money to support YOUR lavish lifestyle which must include a house, at least 2-3 cars, and all that irrelevant shit you buy all the time. What are the very core basics you need in life? Well food, shelter, water, and love. ANY MAN CAN AFFORD THESE THINGS. But you always want more and more and more.
So translation: women would LOVE to be stay-at-home moms and homemakers as long as they can also have their Louis Vuitton bag and BMW in the driveway.
When my boomer parents married my dad was barely making any kinds of money and had to rent an apartment, and now both of them are easily upper middle class. I would have to be borderline retarded to think anything similar could still happen today.
Most men COULD make enough money to support a stay at home wife. The catch is that you have to live in a rural shithole.
You know the rules
It should be a dominance thing, since being dominated is what makes women happy.
OK not PURELY a dominance thing. "Husbandry" you know?
I make 30k a year and it's plenty to raise a family of my stay at home wife, 1 son, and 1 on the way.
>women double the size of the labor force allowing employers to pay lower wages
>women infiltrate HR departments across the economy and convince each other they’re morally correct to give preference to women in hiring.
>women bitch they can’t find a man who makes enough money.
Based and living simply not beyond your means pilled. Most of the world supports large families for far less.
/thread
this chick has a sloppy looking puss
If you want men to return to their traditional role of sole breadwinner for a household, then please stop all the women from adding to the labor supply, thus lowering wages. The truth is that there is no way to have one breadwinner for the entire household unless you impose a rule on who can work and who can't. Elizabeth Warren wrote a whole book about it.
en.wikipedia.org
>The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke is a 2004 popular nonfiction book by Elizabeth Warren and her daughter Amelia Warren Tyagi. The book examines the causes of increasing rates of personal bankruptcy and economic insecurity in American households. It was reissued in 2016.