was 20% "because of the corona"... Well, every year in Europe they have 30% of excess winter mortality.
"Excess winter mortality has been reported in medical journals for about 150 years,1 and most countries suffer from 5% to 30% excess winter mortality.2 However, there still remains much debate with regard to why certain countries experience dramatically higher rates of seasonal mortality than others. Cold strain from both indoors and outdoors has been implicated on several occasions,3–5 however other potential factors (other than cold strain) have rarely been analysed. In addition, there has been far less published research on seasonal variations in mortality in southern Europe.6,7 This may be attributable to the perception that such countries are not affected by excess winter deaths because of their mild winter climates. This paper shows that such a perception is highly mistaken."
Well, it´s a meme Let´s see what the elite will prepare to us
Furthermore, Italy demonstrates a level of 16%, which accounts for some 27 000 excess deaths.
Asher Adams
>Stanford, the university that helped create the virus, is trying to tell people it's nothing Damn bro really made me think, thanks for correcting the record.
>Well, every year in Europe they have 30% of excess winter mortality. What are you even quoting, retard? >the excess winter mortality in Italy was 20% "because of the corona"... Again, source with an exact quoate, or fuck off.
Luis Collins
The study is garbage. The lower bound on their estimate is zero. If you had actually read it, you would know this. It has also been retracted. The authors themselves are even embarrassed to be associated with this work.
Gabriel Hughes
Yessss goyim......go back to work and make the green line go up
Jace Taylor
Garbage study. Authors have been shredded by peer review and have already acknowledged that they're going to release an appendix/addendum to the study outlining everything wrong with it. Basically, it's been retracted. Do your research and stop being a full-blown retard.
regardless, the Stanford study is closer to real life and while the initial modeling was off by an order of magnitude, al public policy was based on the flawed models, also the Stanford stud had been duplicated while the models haven't, but of course the shitlibs will flock to obvious junk science.
No, not regardless. Fact. The study is bunk. Stop looking for confirmation biases and start looking at facts; then your reality won't be so warped and you won't keep looking like a retard posting links to bogus studies.
Liam Myers
remind me where the british epidimilogist's models were published and peer reviewed before influencing global politics? (hint: they weren't and Neil Fergusson isn't even an epidimilogist.)
>Workers and capital can be redeployed to support medicine and public health
>temporary breaking of leases will encourage redeployment to more productive uses
>Voting by mail should also be enhanced and made available without precondition
>To make such tools effective, universal or near-universal availability of high-speed internet connections and mobile connected devices is necessary.
>powers of eminent domain are needed to rapidly increase wireless capability
>police power must be avoided if for no other reason than limited police capacity.
>Conditioning early availability immune testing and certifications on provable compliance is a natural route, as is allowing individuals to prove certified compliance to friends and family.
>Mobilization for transition appears feasible even by the end of April if we can muster sufficient political will.
The lead author of this study is one Eran (((Bendavid))).
Chase King
Medium? Instantly in the trash your post goes cumbrain doomer
Michael Perez
This. Our public policy was determined by models that had to be revised constantly and were the furthest thing from peer reviewed.
Julian Cruz
Literally leftists getting mad that people don't think Corona kills over 1%. Stanford researchers have empirical antibody data. What do the other butthurt statisticians have?
Isaac Nguyen
39% of all New York coranavirus tests have been positive. So if you assume that 39% of New York's population of 19.45 million have the virus (which is a wild overestimate but whatever I just want to prove you retards wrong), then roughly 7.6 million New Yorkers have the corona virus.
And there have been 20,543 coronavirus deaths in New York. 20,543/7.6 million is roughly 0.27% mortality rate.
That's the mathematical MINIMUM mortality rate, assuming there are ZERO new deaths in New York. Which isn't going to happen. But stop trying to pretend like it's even possible the mortality rate is lower than that, because it's not.
As the number of people in New York die that number will continue to rise, and all of you will continue to be proven wrong.
Daniel Carter
every year in Europe they have 30% of excess winter mortality. Furthermore, Italy demonstrates a level of 16%, which accounts for some 27 000 excess deaths.
Cameron Taylor
every study on corona is bunk every single one so why virulently attack this one bunk study while ignoring the bunkness of the rest?
Jace Edwards
Yes the COVID-19 death rate is much lower than reported. But don't go around saying "it's not even as bad as the flu" because the flu death rate is also much lower than reported, most cases of the flu never get added to a statistic other than the number of sick days an employee took.
so the entire statistic is just bunk and should be ignored completely there's no hype with the flu as there has been with corona clearly any death rate is severely inflated by this hype so you cannot say that corona is worse than the flu, as there is no comparison possible between a hyped disease and a non hyped disease. You get more cases reported, more deaths reported as being by corona, you get everything more and especially the bad, which is the sole and only reason corona death rate is higher than the flu.
Xavier Rogers
>Let´s see what the elite will prepare to us the infamous 'second wave'
Jace Sanders
>be globohomo >release virus to control everyone because blumpf >nobody listens or cares because it turns out to be the flu >Hey guys this virus doesn't do anything, return to your lives.
Angel Hughes
The Stanford study is being replicated all across the country with the same results, Futchi is a flim flan man, your position is crumbling. Get fucked flu fag.
Wyatt King
this and nice numerals user
Luis Gutierrez
Untrue. That's not how they calculate flu cases. They literally predict numbers of cases based off of modeling, not testing.
Joseph Morris
They will never admit their incompetence
We will be locked down forever so we cannot truly know how benign the virus was
You're missing the part where your ascribed deaths are 100% Rona. Literally every one that isn't pushes your number down. You're correct, 39% is a wild overestimated number. But so is 20000 deaths.
