Why do libertarians not understand this simple concept?
The virus has changed the environment but the principle is still the same. Ignoring social distancing is violating others right to life.
Why do libertarians not understand this simple concept?
The virus has changed the environment but the principle is still the same. Ignoring social distancing is violating others right to life.
K...KEEP ME POSTED
it's not violating anything. pretense in lieu of facts do not allow for the negation of rights.
A privately owned town can impose rules, you know. And if people dont abide by them you can just kick them out.
If you are an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19, you can infect someone that can die from the virus without realising.
So yes you are negating someone else’s right to live which is why your “rights” need to be curtailed.
The principle in the OP is still consistent despite being in lockdown.
Fuck off ancap, you do not belong in this thread. Let the adults talk.
youre rights don't supersede my rights. stay inside if you are weak old or fat
Perfectly healthy people have died from this as well.
The rights are not being superseded, they are being adjusted based on the environmental conditions which you are not taking into account. Hence, we are all on lockdown together.
Low I.Q post
Hope you have a license for that weapon
This holds true at all times.
You could be harboring a mutated supervirus at any time. Should the shut down last indefinitely? Is human interaction always evil?
great so we can force faggots to wear bubble boy suits then to stop disease spread? fuckin A!!
Depends how infectious it is, if it is as infectious as COVID-19 and more deadly then of course
>right to life
granted by whom or what? don't say god.
The alternative right now is you let this run rampant and ruin society as well as violate the rights of others who want to live
Ok they come from Dawkins, feel better?
you're an idiot who doesn't understand the word.
>if you don’t give up your rights you’re the one taking them away
God gave us instincts, if we see a sick person then we stay away. Government is not part of that equation.
The mere possibility of something happening in the future, which is conjecture, is no reason to negate rights. You can use that kind of argument 'something might happen!' - as a justification for any kind of violation of people's rights you want.
Did I hit a nerve you pathetic leaf.
Your instincts can detect droplets, ok mate
Can't tell if you're a troll or genuinely retarded, maybe both?
imposing social distancing is violating the rights of everyone. you don't have a right to feel safe
Eat shit faggot.
You do not have a "right" to control where I go, if you do not own the property I am on.
You do not have a "right" to interfere in others' business.
When you leftist subhuman attempt to use force to do so, then you should be killed in self defense.
Go kill yourself
I have the right to not be made sick by some fat fuck coofing everywhere with a highly infectious disease running circles
Under what pretense does government have a right to tell you what rights you have?
I can tell you another degenerate fag atheist
If all the people who want to stay inside, stay inside, then they will not be exposed to us. There, we win.
Shouldn't you be self-quarantining bro? Kek just don't let anyone into your house and you'll be fine you scared little bitch.
Stay inside of you want, go out if you want. Dont let any faggot nigger jannie govt tell you what to do.
Ironically we still have a lot of freedoms and can go outside because we are on top of it. Enjoying getting fined for not wearing a mask faggot
It looks like it literally is killing the same amount as the flu after all
Also, social security violates the NAP, so I dont care if the boomers get sick