The Gentlemens Political Commentary

Watch this movie. Guy Ritchies new movie, The Gentlemen is being attacked by Jewish reviewers because of alleged antisemitism simply because the main villain is a Jew who is playing both sides.

Listen to the kvetching this movie gave Alyssa (((Rosenberg)))

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/28/guy-ritchies-gentlemen-dresses-up-anti-semitism/

>Matthew is Jewish, which for the purposes of “The Gentlemen” appears to mean that he is good with money, is devious to the point of unscrupulousness about his business affairs and hires giant bodyguards he describes as his “Mossad crabs.” “Trust this Jew about that Jew,” Mickey’s wife, Rosalind (Michelle Dockery), warns him when the two men commence talks, a scene that, given what comes after, seems to exist mostly to inoculate “The Gentlemen” against charges of anti-Semitism by suggesting that there are Jews on both sides of the conflict.

>Matthew is not merely a tough negotiator; in the grand tradition of anti-Semitic tropes, he’s cheap and a cheat, working with Dry Eye to drive down the value of Mickey’s business, with some of Coach’s trainees as his cat’s paws. The result is a plot in which Jewish and Chinese people are ganging up on white men who are working class in their origins, using — among other people — young black men as their instruments. “The Gentlemen” ends with Mickey’s Chinese and Jewish antagonists dead or maimed, and a consolidated alliance between the black and white characters who began, or remain, lower down on the class scale.

Attached: The Gentlemen.jpg (900x1333, 158.24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=-CxGR7pSODU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

SPOILER-

This movie literally has a Jew villain who, as punishment, is forced to give “a pound of flesh”, Shylock style. Still can’t believe they got away with that shit.

The main character has a jew wife and comes off as a bit too feminist but overall it’s relatively free of pox and definitely worth watching. The faggot character is also portrayed as very degenerate.

just watched this movie again.
why are you spying on me?

m.youtube.com/watch?v=-CxGR7pSODU

Is it good though?

yes, if you liked the movie Snatch you will like this one.

The whole movie is basically a celebration of a white man fucking up jews and asians. “If you want to be the king, it’s not enough to act like the king- you have to be the king” makes for a pretty good call to action to whites and a reminder not to rest on the laurels frok the past.

I do like Snatch

not a bad movie t.b.h.f.a.m

Yes, excellent performances from all the main actors, probably the best thing Guy Ritchie has made.

>The result is a plot in which Jewish and Chinese people are ganging up on white men who are working class in their origins, using — among other people — young black men as their instruments.

There is literally no way Ritchie isn't browsing Yas Forums.

It was OK at best

Kek

Just finished rewatching it tonight after seeing it in theaters

Checked and absolutely unbelievable they got away with this shit, the tides changing.

It wasnt a great movie.
Jews can be antagonists. Ignore occasional moaning from literal who reviewers.

Its not great. Seems much more cheesy and americanised than previous guy Ritchie movies.

I already do. They’re parasites who steal a living.

Hi Guy. Good to see you back on the boards.

It was too good to be true. I kept waiting for some bs to happen. Ruined by every time I give any media a chance. But in the end the white guy out plays and fucks everyone back for their double crossing rat moves. I give it x3 alright

I aim to be a landlord and inherited a sizeable amount of money. I hate the "working" class.

don't watch kike propaganda dude

Kino

One step up from NEET. You can’t fight the system I guess.

>by suggesting that there are Jews on both sides of the conflict.

we have a code 3 SHUT IT DOWN!!!!!

>guy ritchie is making gangster movies again
since when?

It's not as quotable or rewatchable as Snatch, but it is great.

Goody gumdrops. Get us a cup of tea, would you, Errol?

Attached: 1492891921770.jpg (303x321, 16.53K)

It’s one thing to show a jew as a villain, but to use the —-spoiler—- pound of flesh line is pretty remarkable...the average person who isn’t familiar with Shakespeare might not get the reference and just think of it as brutal punishment, but it’s going to immediately hit all but the most ignorant jew watching it.

I genuinely think people that liked this movie have a low IQ.

>cool asian guy
>fucking hilariously stupid black people that are also meant to be cool
>irish tough guy couch
>american protagonist that is just the coolest guy ever but never seems to actually do anything
>super competent british guy saving the day from the background
>meandering plot that doesnt seem to be going anywhere except to accommodate characters that are just ticking boxes
>gangsters who are armed and not armed just to suit a given situation
>bbeg walks straight into a trap at the end and is taken out almost effortlessly but he never really mattered he was just a plot device to allow the racially diverse cast to all be "cool" for 5 mins each and keep a low Q audience happy

I'm pretty sure the average person finished the equivalent of high school. Jesus christ.

based and brick top pilled

it grows on you like all of his movies i suppose

Attached: 07619D65-F899-4314-B57F-B1BF0DFBFC4D.jpg (443x233, 43.89K)

>main character is American
>more Americanized

No shit. But it was also more mature than previous Ritchie movies- slower and more methodical, without the constant back-and-forth pitter patter banter.

It was dumbed down

And previous guy Ritchie movies wernt exactly intellectual to start with. They are basically a british take on Quinton Tarantino movies. The back and forth dialogue is the point.

It came out in dvd today schizo

Even better if you’re right

Sugar?

It was just different. A higher class of crime but still stylised.
Still better than Lock Stock and Rocknrolla.

>Being more like Tarantino means they’re smarter movies

Wew lad. If you don’t like deviation from his old style that’s fine, but the characterization in something like Snatch was far goofier and more simplistic than this.

just watched it less than 1 hour ago.. again.

Shylock was a sympathetic character. All the gentiles in that story are horrible people. I'm pretty sure Shakespear was criticising his audience with that one.