About 80% of the WHO’s finances come from voluntary contributions

About 80% of the WHO’s finances come from voluntary contributions.
Contributors included GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer AG, Sanofi, Merck and Gilead Sciences whose drug remdesivir is currently being trialled, along side the off patent hydroxychloroquine, as a possible preventative treatment for COVID 19.
The third-largest single contributor in 2017 was GAVI. Formerly called the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, they contributed nearly $134 million. GAVI are partnered with the WHO, UNICEF, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Bank to sell vaccines globally.

The World Bank contributed nearly $146 million themselves and the largest individual payment, by some margin, at nearly $325 million came from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).

Attached: IMG_20200420_134828.jpg (480x357, 50.12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_win-micro-gates.htm
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_win-micro-gates26.htm
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton22.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Among other beneficiaries of the BMGF’s generosity are the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) led by Professor Neil Ferguson. They are based at Imperial College London and are directly funded by the BMGF and GAVI. Their objective is to provide statistical data analysis for the BMGF and GAVI in order for them to sell more vaccines.

Prof. Ferguson not only led the team who created the hopelessly inaccurate prediction which the U.S and UK governments based their lockdown regimes upon, he also co-founded the MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling who worked with the WHO in 2009 to create ridiculous computer models predicting the H1N1 pandemic.

About a month ago lots of people were coughing, now its gone .
But we're still being forced to stay at home.
The govt scientific expert says.
>peak will be in a few weeks.
>we don't know when it will peak?

We are being completely bullshitted over this and so many fell for it.

Go outside? Risk dying from COVID-19? Umm..... no thanks. Count me out

do you have a link?

The Stanford study is bullshit. The sensitivity and selectivity of the test kits they used (which came from China) are the WORST among all those tested by the Danish health authorities. Their study SUGGESTS 50-85 times more infections, which would be like 4.5% of the people in Santa Clara county, surely not the 80% needed for herd immunity, but with the potential errors, their results could drop to 0% infected. And the people who published the article in the WSJ are the same fuckers who wrote the damn thing. It’s bunk and anyone who repeats it without understanding it is just pushing the “open the gates” narrative for their own selfish purposes.

Bongs are making money with coronga

Bong are making money with corona

bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_win-micro-gates.htm
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_win-micro-gates26.htm


Thanks to a $750 million dollar commitment from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI launched
its initiative to vaccinate millions of individuals worldwide. The deadly Garasil vaccine is their
prized weapon because of its high mortality rate.


The World Health Organization, one of GAVI’s partners, teamed up with the World Bank and UN
Population Fund in the 1970s under the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”.

The Task Force,

“…acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D.”

GAVI is heavily funded by the Bill & Melinda gates Foundation for the global vaccination projects.

Bingo user. they are hoping people will repeat the 50-85 as a meme and even looking here you see they are successful. Also when the US had very minimal testing available they offer free testing on Facebook and said in the report it was therefore random. Okay so I think I might have it, the hospital can't test, oh look free testing here...Jesus talk about fucking up a basis for randomised testing. It the same group that reported before on this btw and they are using circular reporting now, so this references their previous report as backup and proof. Jesus this is Greta thunberg level retard logic from fucking Stanford no less...

bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_clinton22.htm


The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is also one of the seven largest donors to the Bill,
Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. [4]

The two foundations have also partnered together on a number of initiatives such as the
No Ceilings Full Participation Report. [5]

Bill Gates pretends to care immensely for the poor, particularly in Third World countries,
but the truth is that his Foundation's vaccination and "family planning" (read abortion
and sterilization) efforts are not centered around public health, they are based in eugenics
and population reduction.

After all, it was Bill Gates himself who stated as much publicly when he said,

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a
really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower
that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." [6]

Attached: Clintons.png (551x559, 356.95K)

pasta

Don't forget to sign the COVID treatment refusal form.

Bongs are making money from this

We are on the fifth week of lockdown?hospital admissions should be dropping significantly now but they aren’t,does this virus really exist?

Attached: 1587516138791.png (500x300, 257.28K)

Bongs are making money from this

huh?
>40,000 dead out of 330,000,000
thats like .0001% of population, and i can be certain we all have been exposed to some degree. pandemic my ass.

They accounted for that. Besides the diamond princess (which implied .1% IFR) and USS roosevelt (.02% IFR, though for young people) it's one of the few actual data sets for estimating IFR.

Stanford is the top school in the world.

was for

the study is full of fatal flaws that make any "conclusion reaching" utter jew tier horseshit. a bunch of what-ifs from Stanford which had been pushing nothingburger propaganda from day one. congrats on being a top tier brainlet

Attached: A131A0FE-C9CA-47CE-8104-7A34ACAE0CEF.jpg (229x221, 13.39K)

>Stanford is the top school in the world.
no ignoramus. stanford is where rich people send trust fund babies for guaranteed passing grades. you can drop classes the day before the final fucking exam, top fucking kek. how do you think their diversity agenda minorities manage to pass? the place is a farce and a joke but they've done a great job at polishing their image and reputation. back to le leddit with you

Attached: 0A5DB1AC-A8BB-401B-B5DC-29477121B20B.jpg (398x376, 40.45K)

>HAHA IM NOT GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT THE PROBLEMS WITH THE STUDY ARE IM JUST GOING TO SHIT ALL OVER IT AND TELL YOU TO IGNORE IT LOOOOOOL XDDDD
You bring shame to your country.

Say whatever you want to hold onto your fantasy of a super scary virus, midwit.

shut up copypasta bot. They used american made tests for antibodies, they weren't testing for rona.

antibodies means that 4.5% are people who had it and recovered. if 4.5% of the country had it and recovered (meaning 14,715,000 recoveries in the US) and 45,000 died so far, that means a death rate of 0.3% which is like a bad flu season.
The point is this thing isn't a plague worth nuking the economy for.

The tests came from Premier Biotech in Minnesota. Pretty much everything in your post is a lie. When this is over and the investigations happen, I hope people like you are found and locked away forever. Or even better, found out and identified for the public. What the hundreds of millions who were unnecessarily imprisoned for months do to you is just what happens.

>Stanford study proves
How can they prove it? There's not enough data.
What they have done is make a prediction, one which doesn't seem likely given that the number of deaths is considerably higher when compared to the average death rate for this time of year.
How do they account for that?

the duality of bong

noticed most shills use pepe nowadays lol
its so lame, they cant meme for shit

?? A second flu being introduced would add considerably to the death toll considering how many people die of flu each year. I don't think they're saying that COVID isn't a problem/doesn't kill a lot of people, only that it's basically a second flu. Meaning an exorbitantly large number of people are infected but very few actually die from it. It would still inflate death totals.

I'm not leaning one way or the other, just saying their statement can be true while the death total still remains relatively high compared to previous years. COVID can be highly contagious and cause a lot of death while having a very, very low overall chance of killing you.

I think they are tired and frustrated, so they got uncreative. This was the one time the world would suffer like the NEETs do, and now it's slipping away.

The 50-80 number is consistent with what happened in the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Sweden and Veneto.

For a few countries like spain and italy it is higher.

Across europe, the 2016-2017 flu season looks like it will have been worse than death rates with corona.

this is the same "university" that predicted how most of the ppl already have immunity meanwhile actual representatives samples reveal less than 10% of the populations got it if at all

ah yes, american universities, the pinnacle of science and bribery
LMAO, get fucked hacks