What went wrong?
What went wrong?
Other urls found in this thread:
Human Corruption
Stalin and Marxism-Leninism (totalitarianism and central planning)
What if Gandhi was in charge though?
Everyone can be corrupted, all it takes is what power they wield.
He'd touch kids and scream at niggers?
Ghandi will have a successor.
Let's skip to the end shall we:
Communism is theoretically possible but is an unstable equilibrium. Kind of like balancing a pencil on it's tip.
People
This, then intersectionalism took everything from Marx and curb stomped it out of existence. Bioleninism is the end result.
Revolutionary Catalonia
unironically this
but i guess the NEP was when it started.
marx and engels were based
stalin bukharin and to a lesser extent lenin and trotsky were all fags.
Authoritarian soviet communism irreversibly skewed how the west views socialism and communism while many of the libertarian leftist communes have succeeded, see Zapatistas and Rojava
corruption exists everywhere user
its retarded to blame it
Communism is what went wrong.
Any system run by corrupt kikes is bound to wind up a gutted failure. Our modern Jew York Shitty crapitalist system is another recent example.
It's hollow, it's corrupt, and headed for the burn pile.
>Remove the power from the majority of people
>Place that power in self-elected officials
>That power lets them remain powerful the rest of their life
>Remove the ability of the people to protest action clearly set against them
>What went wrong?
Truly the question of the ages
NUKES
>Had legislation and a police class that enforced the legislation's laws, psised everyone off by pulling nuns out of convents, raping them and setting them on fire
>Killed 10% of it's Christian population every year until it had it's shit pushed in by Fascists
Revolutionary Catalonia was a nightmare dystopia that had legislators that outlawed the ability to call it a state. It was 1984 from the day it was born in blood until the day the fascists stomped it out.
Thread
I don't want to hate on Lenin and Trotsky too much, I mean it's a miracle the soviet union even got created with the 21 invading armies and illiterate as fuck peasants. It's easy to see why they chose centrally planing for that time period. Not trying to be a tankie simp, but just saying.
Kulaks pretending they don't have any grain and the Soviet state using that as an example to starve people to death in addition to allowing a literal gangster to usurp the State into totalitarianism and putting political ideology on a pedestal and killing anyone in the way for the sake of the "Revolution" for the sake of the People.
Which means they in general were a bunch of retarded faggots that didn't know how to effectively run a system that wasn't supposed to be run on power and greed but was anyway.
Communism is a fucking joke. It gets thoroughly manipulated by power hungry cockbags taking advantage of indecision.
See, this is what Im talking about with you fucking people. Are Russians all chinks, or are they fucking kikes? Because it makes no sense.
Thats more an argument for aristocracy than anything else though.
>1984
The irony is George Orwell fought on it's side.
Most likely misguided, but too proud or scared to be willing to change anything
Yes, I know, he somehow wrote extensively on the danger and terror, but when presented with the very same thing he warned about, he strolled through and went
"Yeah I know they're raiding homes, killing the religious, ransacking churches, burning nuns, but I mean, the worker's in charge so long as they follow the law they can't call the law or they get murdered, right?"
It was the most ridiculous shit.
lurk 2 years before posting
Source?
Humans are inherently flawed and this system requires flawless humans.
No fucking shit Sherlock, but considering everyone has to be selfless to the point of lacking individual thought in order for communism to work means its garbage.
Also how many times have 10 million plus people starved to death because of Capitalism.
Elite betrayal.
You're the one citing his thoughts on Revolutionary Catalonia. He explicitly makes note of churches being ransacked in the same statement he makes where he says "It feels like the worker's in charge", which is the most baffling shit where he tries to argue that workers are in charge while gangs eviscerate anyone religious and demolish property because it's religious. Clearly he meant "The worker's in charge, so long as they obey the legislation. If they disobey they're killed, their places of worship smashed, and their families set fire."
What went right?
I don't give a shit about the religious institutions, tell me about them looting homes. source.
>(communism)
>What went wrong?
It's a retarded ideology. It cannot go right. That's impossible.