Why do we keep pretending that capitlism is the best economic system we have when it does nothing but promote greed and...

Why do we keep pretending that capitlism is the best economic system we have when it does nothing but promote greed and destruction?

Attached: 1522849945507.jpg (250x185, 6.92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/olda6UNMRD4
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/truth-money-iou-bank-of-england-austerity
mises.org/library/our-money-based-debt
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's not capitalism.
It's the debt-based financial system.

Back in the day if you got too rich, they would seize your assets and banish you.

This. Abolish usury & central banking as well as strip corporate power by implementing syndicalism in large businesses. Then you’ll have a Capitalist system that actually favors the average working man. What we have now is wageslavery LARPing as a mixed economy.

Those things can't be separated. A small percent of people have most of the capital, if you want to purchase anything, a house for instance, you have no choice but borrow from them.

That's why we are National SOCIALIST.

If you outlaw credit, what do you think happens?

You just described human nature. Congratulations genius. Now name a place/system that isn't the case.

Based OP. We need ethno-states with resource-based economies and socialist governments.

Are you the cringe Catalonian poster that always says “if you’re talking about Hebrew. That was the language of Jesus so it must be good”

This. Capitalism wins because it acknowledges this and works with it, not against it.

how long is back in the day? 'Rockefeller's net worth was the same as $340 billion after adjusting for inflation and taking into account relative GDP at the time'

If the government still issued money then they could simply issue out 0% interest loans.

>and banish you
>rockefeller
Longer back than that...

This

Where do we have capitalism? Sure not in the US.

You misunderstand how money works.

If you take out a mortgage, you are not borrowing money from rich people.

The bank CREATES the money, which goes to the seller.
You then pay the bank back.

By this mechanism, the money supply is increased.

If this sounds crazy to you... it is because it is.

Attached: 1381850454624.jpg (2048x1536, 395.12K)

In your opinion where and in what period of time have we had real capitalism?

But that's wrong you fucking retard. When you take out a mortgage you're borrowing other peoples money. The bank is just the middle man.

People are greedy. McDonald's doesn't cook you nuggets out of the kindness of their hearts, they do it to make that sweet $7.25/hr

All the retards in this thread need to understand how detrimental fiat currencies, fractional reserve banking and compound interest are. Watch the documentary "Collapse" featuring Michael Rupert

>capitlism...does nothing but promote greed and destruction?
I think you meant socialism.

Yup. We have a population issue, a resource issue, and a Jewish issue.

No! The bank is not the middle man. The bank creates the money.

If your natural reaction is to think that I am incorrect, then you are sane.

The problem is.. I'm not wrong.
This how the global economy works.

And it is absolutely insane.

Look it up.

Communism =/= socialism, you fucking retard.

I've grown convinced the best system of government is the Spartan model.

The Federal Reserve issues their "bank notes". They perpetuate an uneconomical system. Its a Rothschild pyramid scheme that was established to enslave this country in 1913 and ultimately funnel all the REAL, TANGIBLE RESOURCES/WEALTH UP TO THE TOP.

Attached: 1570864589235m.jpg (1024x576, 71.16K)

He's right, the bank just create the money you borrow.

How do you propose to make capitalism work with no compounding interest? Without that what motivation would people have to loan money? Then how would the poor get the capital to pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

Perhaps it is, but can you imagine americans or Europeans not being materialist?

I have looked it up. Your just plain fucking wrong. I'm under no illusion that money isn't just printed these days. But not in the case of mortgages and loans. That's just not how they fucking work.

>No answer
Figures

Do you know what "fractional reserves" are?

it is called fractional reserve lending, they can loan ten times the amount of money that they have in reserves, meaning 90 percent of loaned money is created by the loan itself

Not new money. Someone has to be making deposits for loans to go out.

retard

Are you insanely retarded? You're either trolling or deeply immersed in the fucking matrix that has been pulled over your eyes. If you actually care to have a thorough answer for your question, then watch the documentary "Collapse". Here's a link: youtu.be/olda6UNMRD4

>Your
You're illiterate, and that's too bad.

However I don't think you are too stupid to understand what I am trying to say.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/truth-money-iou-bank-of-england-austerity

>When banks make loans, they create money

Wait is pepe and keroppi related?
Hold on and hello kitty? Caturday...
Dude what the fuck weird as connection was just made. Now im moar convinced this timeline is programmed. Fuuuckkk /x/posting ughhghghgh

in what period or system has there not been a small percentage of the population with a large percentage of the power?

Based Keroppi

>retard
Nice argument faggot, care to actually address what i said though?

>Not new money. Someone has to be making deposits for loans to go out.
Someone has to deposit around 1000 dollars to be kept as reserve so 9000 dollars can be created.

>complains about materialism
>wears that flag

Wew!

>However I don't think you are too stupid to understand what I am trying to say.
that is where you are wrong, he is a nigger and a retard

I asked a very simple simple question, how do you make it work without that element? If what Im saying is so retarded you should easily be able to clear it up. I never said Im not against any of that Im just asking how youd propose to make it work without that element given what Ive told you

mises.org/library/our-money-based-debt

Look up "money as debt"
You will see that I am right.

Attached: four.gif (300x242, 1.78M)

I don't have any pride in wearing my native flag, this flag represents an ideology far less materialist than any other on the options, and to be right the soviet flag is incredible aesthetic.

Revolutionary Catalonia, free territory of Ukraine etc

"greed" LOL

People don't loan money.
Banks do.

And they loan it to increase the money supply.

Attached: debt.png (1348x526, 95.27K)

Wow you’re pretty blind. Debt is evil and a debt based economic system is evil. People don’t pull themselves up by using debt, that is a lie. Incurring debt only puts money in the hands of the person giving debt due to interest. Even if you pay off your loan, the interest has created new money for the loaner. In this way infinite amounts of money can be created for the people at the top so long as the people at the bottom keep borrowing. Oh, and since the debt is federally insured they run zero risk if you default on the debt.

The problem is that no one has proposed a better solution, but I still sincerely doubt capitalism is the best that we can do.
The left sure loves to criticize capitalism, but what they fail to do is propose valid alternatives. The plan is usually just to overthrow it and then we live happily ever after. The end.

>implying
Capitalism is not the problem. Usury is the problem. Usury has always been the problem.

oh you like the post apocalyptic thing eh?

Can you imagine capitalism without usury? It's like slavery without slaves.

>wanting free shit and demanding your neighbors act exactly as you want in your commune isn’t greed or destruction

Capitalism sucks but so does communism. We should have a mixed economy where certain things are nationalized and certain things are left to the market. There should be a UBI. Also, tariffs should be very high and companies should be punished for outsourcing domestic jobs.

Attached: 14F3E6C0-6C4D-473C-BA36-057885DD6223.png (1914x1317, 914.82K)

You asked a question that shows how deeply deluded you are. It took myself, and others, time and effort to arrive to valuable answers. I know enough to know that compound interest is detrimental on deeper levels than you realize, but I'm not well-versed enough to explain why. For this reason I provided you with a link to a documentary that will yield that answer, and many others. Its up to you to find the truth. I've made it easy for you. You're welcome.

We need some kind of socialism but on a national level.
Got any ideas?

Youre not reading what Im writing, youre tilting at windmills because you assume my positions and want to be mad or something. I never said a debt based economic system based on interest isnt evil. Im asking you how capitalism would work without that evil considering everything Ive said in previous posts

I already did. We need ethno-states with RESOURCE-BASED economies and socialist governments.

You want results like on image?

Attached: 1585809096712.jpg (273x185, 8.98K)

Libertarian socialism and democratic control of the means of production. Simple as

>problems created by Jews
>problems created by Jews undermining the state
>more problems created by the state
>problems created by Jews pretending to be the state
>A problem, created by the state, via Jews
GUISE THIS IS ALL FWEE MARKET CAPITAWISMS FAULT HUERHERUHERUERHUERUHERHUERUHERUH
kys jewnigger

Attached: 1583886897588.jpg (1026x1369, 213.79K)

eh I think it would be interesting for a couple months but not really. Catalonia was said to be pretty comfy if you werent fighting or near any of the bad juju