What does Yas Forums think about Conquest's Three Laws of Politics?
>1. Everyone is conservative about what he cares about.
>2. Any organization not explicitly right-wing will sooner or later becomes left-wing.
>3. The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.
Does this explain why society drifts over the centuries to the lef?
Other urls found in this thread:
BBBRRRAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
LITERALLY BUILT
For bwc
absolutely nonsensical and boomerpilled
imagine worrying about "leftism" in the 21st century
Leftism is the force in history that we're continually progressing towards. Leftism takes overall all institutions eventually, from schools to media to government beaurocracies.
>The Denver, Colorado municipal Department of Environmental Health has purchased several Nasal Rangers to help determine if the smell of marijuana or other substances at any given location is strong enough to merit a fine or other regulatory action.
cool
Look at those stairs. They look solid.
>legal weed wont be used as a bludgeon by the governmen-
Get fucked stoners the government will always find a way to use everything as a legal weapon
FOR
god i wish that was me
Coffee
That middle beam sure helps!
absolutely wrong, such a view of the world could only have been concocted by the mind of a boomer
civilizations have arose and collapsed multiple times throughout history, so have modes of production, systems of governance, power configurations, etc.
the current notion of "leftism" is nothing more than the movement for the emancipation of the individual achieved via the slow insemination of the foundational idea of popular power as the basis of legitimacy for the modern state, a movement that began with the magna carta and the french revolution and so on
anyway the developments of said movement in the 21st century isn't up to individual people or organizations or countries at all, if we become more or less "leftist" it'll be simply as a side effect of the 4th industrial revolution that's starting to revolutionize social relations, including labor, but is yet to start seeping into governing structures (we'll see radical descentralization and fragmentation and experimentation)
Look I don't even care anymore I just want girls to find me bearable again I WANT THE BLUE PILL I WANT THE BLUE PILL
>civilizations have arose and collapsed multiple times throughout history, so have modes of production, systems of governance, power configurations, etc.
They always move to the left.
Take a conservative today, and take him back 50 years ago. He would be considered a liberal. Take a conservative from 50 years ago and move them 100 year ago, same idea. Same for any period, the conservative of a later time is always to the left of the conservative in an earlier time.
Leftism is social entropy, the dissolution of bonds, standards and hierchies. Societies are build in various structures, from racial homogeniety to family structures to economic and governmental standards. But each of these rules and standards will dissolve as technology makes the previous rules less and less necessary. And entropy always increases, it never decreases.
This is the real red pill.
C'thulu may swim slowly. But he always swims to the left.
Why do chicks shape their eyebrows like this--it's off-putting.
wrong, take a conservative medieval peasant to the roman republic and he'd still be the more conservative one
Damn, that girl is perfect.
I have BWC, why can't I get something like that? My GF is big enough to put on a catapult and shoot at enemy castles.
>Why do chicks shape their eyebrows like this--it's off-putting.
Blame the porn industry. Porn women pluck their eyebrows so they look really far apart. I don't know why they do it but other women are paying attention so its a trend.
That's just wrong. The medieval peasant would have the progressivising influence of Christianity, which the much more brutal Roman peasant would not. The liberal meme of medieval period being some dark time is not true, by every objective measure it was a vastly more technologically advanced time in which life was much easier, in which the old social rules from a previous more brutal time were laxed.
But then again you're a monkey so what do you know.
It's common sense. How about you swallow the God's Plan-pill, user?
AAAAAAHHHH IM COOOOOOOMING!!!!!
Very close you're just missing the supernatural component of the cabal.
B ig
B avarian
C ock
>the progressivising influence of Christianity
lol no
christianity for a long time had an extremely obscurant influence on societies, just off the top of my head in the norse lands people used to keep silver coins inside their jars of water, this was knowledge that was passed down upon centuries and it was done so for sanitary effect, but the church saw it as a backwards ritual and outlawed it to dire health effects
roman society in its peak reached levels of abundance unmatched in many other eras, including for many of its previous controlled territories for much of the lower middle ages, literacy in the roman empire was much more prevalent in the civilian population because the state and trade had more scale, people were naturally more accepting of other cultures and religions simply due to the extent of the empire, etc.
another example that breaks your little ideology is present day iran vs. 70's iran
Wrong. Christianity has always been a progressive force, it teaches tolerance, turning the other cheek, giving to the poor and erasing economic hierchies...etc. Its only seen as "conservative" today because we have predictably moved to the left.
The brief period of moving right in Iran is an interesting exception, one born of a desire to bring back the glory days of Persian relevance after total domination by the Anglo-American period during the 70s. But its a failed ghost dance, you're already seeing the protests and youth activism that will bring its inevitable downfall to the left. Do you think Iran will still be controlled by Mullahs in 50 years? No rational person does, it will be absorbed into the globohomo collective. The next generation will make sure of it, as technology and living standards increase it makes people more and more soft,and more and more comfortable. They discard the rules and standards set by their ancestors, and embrace decadance and entropy.
Which is the alien.
Explain the moon.
This is the truth. And this is the great filter. Every civilization wipes itself out by this mechanism.
God imagine the coffee shits
Why is it safe to assume the third thing? Maybe for some "captured" organizations, but not all
your idea of a sort of "social entropy" backdrop to the history of civilizations is right but it has nothing to do with "leftism" and "decadence" at all, it just happens that so far the main force behind civilizational evolution (despite many hiccups throughout history) has been the development and intensifying of trade, and it just happens that currently trade is intensified by giving the individual liberty (as consumer, a worker, an entrepeneur), and it just happens that currently said fundamental liberties for trade don't fundamentally clash with the other civil liberties, which can go right and left with the market not caring at all... I emphasize CURRENTLY because there are huge chunks in economic history where the development of trade required the installment of undoubtedly conservative/right-wing social ideas in society (most recently the protectionist-imperialist age), and the day might come where the development of trade requires the installment of undoubtedly liberal/left-wing social ideas in society (most recently the post ww2 golden age of capitalism where globalization and the welfare state wend hand in hand in defeating communists)