What is the most deep political or philosophical question you can do to a person in your opinion...

You have 2 options:
> when you die you're just gone forever, no afterlife, no consciousness, nothing
> when you die you're reborn into exactly the same life, and will live it over and over again forever, without remembering it

Well Yas Forums?

Attached: 646516846.gif (600x337, 3.69M)

ez
what is freedom?

An excelent question. Undoubtedly one of the most deep questions we can do, but despite that, one that is out my reach to make a comment about. I think that the meaning of life is the one that you give to it.

To start with, a world without politics was the starting point, as you may know, before the social contract. And that is why you are talking about "in this time". Anyway, answering the question my opinion is that a society without politics at this point is completely impossible. There are a ridiculous amount of human beings out there, and living in a non organized society is more than impossible because of that, and more importantly, there is no reason to abandon the facilities that living with enormous groups of people provides.

The most basical aspect of the human's (and animal's in general) will is the biological aspect that's behind it. But we can trascend it, can't we? The problem is that the only thing that makes us slighly different from animals is the fact that we are conditioned by sociological factors too, because being a little more complex.
But yes, a decision is the result of a context in particular, determined by experiences, biological facts, and shit, does that oppose to the free will concept? Depends on what you consider free will. If it is act at one's discretion, no.
the power of acting without the constraint of necessity, no. A human can trascend until certain point his biological issues.
If your conception of it is related to the fate... then yes. As sad as it may sound, fate exist, the world is a succession of cause and effect.

Attached: medakabox02 (1).png (500x533, 162.34K)

A Hemispherectomy is a procedure that involves the removal of one Hemisphere of your brain. It's usually done to stop life threatening seizures, and when done has little to no effect on the patient's intelligence or personality, regardless of which side is removed. The Brain adapts to take on both functions.

Suppose you have this procedure done to yourself, put into a deep sleep, you initially have both hemispheres removed simultaneously. Assume that your body and your brain can survive without one another for a short time via advanced life-support technology. There is in the room an "empty shell", a perfect genetic clone of your body with the exception of a brain. The doctors take your brain, sever the hemispheres, and place one hemisphere in each body. Both hemispheres are connected at the same time, and you both wake up at the same time.

When you wake up, which body are you in?

Attached: 1586206100296.jpg (500x500, 32.29K)

A better question seems to be, when you wake up, if the bodies in question never meet, would either body be able to tell the difference?

>when you die you're reborn into exactly the same life, and will live it over and over again forever, without remembering it
You're a god and I've never heard anything more divine.

If we are in a simulation maybe the main question is what we choose with our free will.

I want to know how was Life in the pre flood woooooorld. I want to know if theres advance tech underwater with the sunk cities i want to knooooow

The original body, if you try to solve it thinking about Theseus' ship. Alternatively, I'm neither and you have killed me - these two bodies are something else, but neither are the original me.

Science was created to answer questions about the universe.

In the past, many questions could not be answered due to a lack of means, with the progress of science, many of such questions were answered.

If we were to find a question that we are incapable of answering, not due to a lack of resources, but a fundamental incapability due to a lack of answers to be found within our universe, would the answer to such a question be God?

But what about the original body that had a hemisphere of brain removed, but not placed into a second body? Would you consider the original body dead? If yes, then you're dead regardless. If no, then technically, theseus's ship doesn't work here, since an original half of the original brain from the original body would remain in the second body. All of the components would not be entirely replaced.

The series of questions that gets someone to realize there is no free will.

What happens in our brain that makes us act?
>electrical patterns and chemical reactions that create thoughts and activate muscles

Is there anything that creates thoughts and actions besides electrical patterns and chemicals?
>no

Do the electrical patterns and chemicals obey the laws of physics?
>yes

If this is true, a computer that had every piece of information about the current state of your brain, and everything that will happen to you, could predict everything about your future actions, behaviors, emotions, thoughts and more.

Therefore, "free will" is an illusion; it is simply the product of algorithms in your brain.

Could you stop being a nigger?

About free will. There arent many things you can do here. Basically if you have a strong Will you arent going to do certain things and you are going to live like a normal human being. I dont think the free Will thing is hard to get

Nothing good ever came from someone who uploads anime pictures, and/or have pictures of disgusting anime saved on their phone/pc
Fuck off with that toilet philosophy

>What is the most deep political or philosophical question you can do to a person in your opinion?
Normally pointing out the Jews worship Satan an that whites are the true Semiitc people fucks people up. Puts them on the right path, but fucks them up.

>Would you consider the original body dead?
I think it's one of the possible conclusions you could draw, yes. Which indeed would mean I'm dead regardless.

>All of the components would not be entirely replaced.
How many components have to be replaced for you to consider it a different ship? I say any component is already enough to make this assertion - and certainly changing the brain or the whole body is already is already a significant change for you not to consider it the same anymore.

An interesting idea, and not too dissimilar, is about teleportation. Say a teleporting machine has been constructed and you can be moved between any two stations - however, you can only be moved one atom at a time, in such a manner that you're essentially disassembled and reassembled in these two stations. If you go into this machine, is the person that comes out of the other end still you?

I have a question IT anons please help
If you have a huge computer. And make the universe in full detail etc. And you programa the people to make choices. And you program those finite numbers of choices someone can do. And you let It play itself.

The people in the program are choosing with their own free Will?

It would be a parallel race of beings with human-like capabilities.

100% retard:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergentism

>How many components have to be replaced for you to consider it a different ship?
I would say any component, except the brain, personally. Its recorded memories are intrinsically what makes you. Many things can happen to your body, and your mind remain the same. Things can be subtracted from your body, or added, but if the brain isn't touched, did it affect the thing that is you? I'm thinking of the brain as the ship itself, I suppose. I guess we'll differ on that.
>If you go into this machine, is the person that comes out of the other end still you?
That I don't have an answer to, and can't even guess at. Would you be able to tell the difference? Would you feel or think differently if you were ripped apart at the atomic level and reassembled? If you did think and feel differently, would you remember ever having thought or felt any differently post reassembly? Too many questions.

Please i need AN answer. Do you understand my question?

Idk, I'm not 100tific, mate.

Predicting human being actions don't need such complicated procediment. The only thing required is to study sociology to find the pattern in human behaviour, and by that studies you can know how a human, who belongs to a sociological context, will most likely behave.
But if you're talking about an specific human being and predicting more seriously what he's gonna do... for that you need to understand first how the mind works, just having information ain't enough desu.

Cute burger.

Deep, my brother.

In both of them I, as who I am because of the information that's on my mind, am going to die. If you won't remember anything, and the life is always the same, then its absolutely meaningless, as I see it. But life is meaningless anyway, so...

Being able to act as you please, I think. Correct me if Im wrong, but in english there isn't such thing as "libertinaje", which anyway is a concept created to make undesirable human behaviour "incorrect". But to what we renounce in the social contract is no more than freedom, not being able to kill a person, is limiting your freedom. May sound sad, but that is what it is.

I think that the point is exactly what is "you". If its a matter of consciousness, or what greeks called "soul", both of them are you, at least for me: I don't consider that there exist such thing as a only and particular "soul" like in the christian or religious conception, its just the result of information+biology, as I said. >:(
But in a more wide perspective of it, the answer that the brazilianon gave is good enough.
Anyway, things appears to make you think that you are a different being every single moment; but in order to live, we make that idea more simple than that.

A fish who lives in a fishbowl would never find the answer to what the fuck is the sun, but he can find inside the fishbowl evidence that there is something. The sun exists outside his reach (call it universe), and is part of a different reality. Does that become the sun god?

No you would need to introduce randomness somehow. At the lowest levels of physics you have to describe things in terms of probability distributions because it becomes impossible for determine things exactly, which is very much not how a computer works