WHO insists

'all available evidence' suggests coronavirus came from an animal and was not created in a lab

Attached: Capture.jpg (1044x425, 96.1K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

who?

The WHO also said at some time that all evidence suggests that the virus doesn't spread from person to person.

i know you're being obtuse but you do understand that we know more about the virus now than we did back in november-january

It was probably a mistake, mere incompetence. Why else cover it up?

No one has claimed it was created in a lab. It came from a bat and was stored in a lab where it was released.

More Chinese propaganda from the Ethiopian minister of truth.

>all available evidence indicates
>at this time we think
>might maybe someday

The WHO is useless.

Yeah and we know a lot more about the WHO than we did back then too. But maybe you're right, guess I love china now.

I wonder why china would lock down entire cities for something that doesn't spread person to person in January.

>Why else cover it up?
They did just because they were stupid enough to think nobody would notice a worldwide pandemic originating from Wuhan. Must be superior chink iq.

Literally who

like a lab animal?

An evil entity could create a virus, inject it in a bat and claim innocence as somehow it came from a bat.

Lab creation confirmed.

>evidence
>false flag to start an economic war on China
We don't need no stinkin' evidence to take China back to a starving peasant economy.

>like a lab animal?
Smuggled out of the lab by an unpaid intern and sold at market?

>CHINA insists China didn't accidentally leak a deadly virus from their only level 4 virology biolab that also coincidentally exists 15 minutes away from the first known outbreak site

I bet they also insist orientals aren't disgusting smelly yellow goblins with tiny penises.

>Chinese shill organization paid for mostly by Chinese shills then goes and shills for the Chinese

In other words, water is wet. More at 11.

YES THANKS LITERAL WHO BUT THEY FUCKING CONDUCTED RESEARCH ON NATURALLY OCCURING VIRUSES GATHERED FROM BATS IN THE LAB

WHO = CCP

Injecting it into a bat would do as much good at removing editing signatures as injecting it into a human would.

We need to take Takeshi out with a SEAL team on live TV.

Attached: USA.jpg (550x427, 43.15K)

Holy fuck, Yas Forums was right about it being a bioweapon.

WHO knew about person to person by december, retard.

WHO is right this time. It's far more likely some peasant ate something he shouldn't have.

>'all available evidence' suggests
the leadership of who is a nigger and this virus is obviously a stolen chink bioweapon

>not created in a lab
>but came from an animal consumed in the wuhan wet market
>wet market just reopened last week
>lessons learned = 0

The proximity of the outbreak to the top lab in China for studying bat coronavirus is strong circumstantial evidence.

im not saying dont be skeptical of WHO or their chinese ties but theres now more evidence about the virus than there had been 3 months theres little to no connection to it being a manmade chinese bioweapon

nice VPN Chang how many social credit points did that set you back

trusting the WHO when they were still saying it couldn't be transmitted between humans is what allowed it to spread to Japan, Thailand and America, and widely within China
they were also telling the Chinks that PPE was over rated when Hong Kong was begging for face masks
the WHO are a bunch of spastics who do PR work for the CCP and the Gates Foundation

nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews

Not that I necessarily dispute things, but this can be a lie within a truth. The virus could have INITIALLY been transmitted from animal to human (currently last I heard to be from pangolins) without too much todo. HOWEVER, the WHO laboratory in wuhan could have also subsequently collected this virus for study and analyze, as was the lab's mission, only to, at some point later, mishandle containment/isolation protocols and accidentally infect the nearby populace, putting the blame on the WHO lab, and subsequently giving them plenty of impetus to cover everything up.

>We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.

As always, pay particular attention to the wording.

It did come from an animal and was not created in a lab. It was bat SARS that was modified to infect humans in a lab. Technically and legally speaking, the media will rarely lie to you. But that doesn't mean they're telling the complete truth either.

yes you are certainly an average white american

Attached: 32349217_5132b4e470_z-5249[1].jpg (480x480, 93.18K)

>believing the WHO

>ever

Now it definitely came from a lab. NUKE CHINA WHEN

Attached: sheeit.jpg (1470x1116, 330.53K)

even then multiple people were already dead or dying you brainlet

Not even normalfags trust the who at this point. Its in the aussie new how the china had leverage the WHO to reopen our boarders

ah so penis so small fishy smell ning nong ping pong torture dog and snort powdered rhino balls starve to death and praise Mao eat gutter oil and get face degloved by industrial machinery put lemonade in vintage wine and eat centipede get laughed at by whole world slitty eyes and dried fish heads

>WHO obviously in chinas pocket
>reposting anything the who says
>even once

Hello agent chink. Is the chinese internet control center not infected enough?
Were not going to fund your commie disinformation WHO group anymore

>who also responsible for utilizing dysentery to wipe out Africans
>thinking the WHO doesnt want u dead
>WHO saying we need to take your family members from the home


Fuck off ching xhong
You're either a shill or a fucking CCP shill piece of shit

>10 points have been added to your social credit score

absulutely disgusting

Attached: 1579819776897.jpg (828x699, 452.81K)

Sage goes in the options field

IIRC the WHO *actually* said they had no evidence of person-to-person spread, which is different than "we have evidence that it doesn't".

>officials need to sound sure of things
And that's how you wind up with:

>"When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that's a pretty good job we've done."

Confidence is a symptom of ignorance.

Sometimes this is harmless or beneficial - being confident that my penis is one of the best your wife has ever had provides a better experience for her than asking "is it good enough? really?"

Sometimes this is... not so good, like when you're confident that the chairman of the Communist Party's economic theory expertise means he's better qualified to set agricultural policy than illiterates whose only education is "how to stare at the ass of a water buffalo", "picking rice? Tiring AND boring: a thirty-year intensive" and "how to stare a water buffalo's ass: the buffalo works so you have to too.".

America has been in 'not so good' for a while now, you just finally had something important happen.

>China's least credible outfit claims China is blameless
Smooth.

Attached: 1573087485982.png (1614x862, 712.92K)

Takeshi loves pooh dick so much.

Let's talk about Taiwan

Good to know that there is evidence that the Wuhan Coronavirus was leaked from a lab, but it isn't available now

Attached: WUHAN.jpg (960x960, 172.08K)

WHO let the virus out?

>created
Nobody is saying it was created, it escaped

It's true, that's what CNN just said as well.