Under capitalism, it is better to destroy food because feeding starving people isn't profitable.
Meanwhile, millions of people are facing severe food insecurity and grocery store shelves are empty.
This is the logic of capitalism on full display. We need a socialist system that distributes food and other necessities on the basis of human need, not for profit.
Its always a fucking leaf lol What's the matter? In store prices got you down?
Carter Murphy
whatever bilionaire who claims to have a heart should buy some of those surplus and give it to poor people
Evan Edwards
Once again you retards have no background in something but you let your heart do the talking- It’s a problem of transporting goods not an issue with the quantity of goods being created. Nobody, and I mean nobody, in North America struggles with food insecurity outside of niggers living in urban food deserts because companies pulled out of those shitholes after repeated robbery and assaults.
Charles Edwards
There is no one starving in the world that's a Jewish myth. Even niggers get free govt food.
The pol shill is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But criticize capitalism or Trump's pandering to capitalistic interests and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
Asher Sullivan
Well they could… novel idea, I know… deliver it to people in need. When the government was giving out billions for big corporations to buy back their own stock, they could have instead been paying farmers and food producers to deliver and donate their unsold product to the needy.
Brayden Hall
make it uht and people will buy tonnes of that shit fucking retard farmers
Carter Sanchez
but but but heart is better at figuring out how to operate a supply chain, what do you mean the world doesn't run on feefees
The cows have to be continually milked, it's bad for the cows of you don't. The demand has dropped and they are making a surplus. They can't store it, so they have to dump it unless someone can find a use for millions of gallons of milk. Same with the eggs, they can't just stop the chickens from laying eggs, so they have to dump the excess. They can't lower the production because it will take years to get to normal levels again. I know that this isn't the ideal solution, but it's what they are doing with their milk and eggs.
John Cooper
In the EU, farmers big and small burn tons and tons of produce and dump milk because they get subsidized by the state to produce more than they can sell.
Michael Jones
No... you need a secondary system where the government may procure overages as a reduced cost in exchange for providing packaging (related systems) and distribution, or reimburse the manufacturer at at least cost for those facilities.
In short, make it easier for manufacturers to switch to ultralow cost wholesale packaging and distribution.
According to you, you have to "Build a system" anyways... Just augment the existing one. For instance... you fags can supply Bags to EVERYONE, plus the Bagging machinery, and distro containers for milk. YAY CANADA! Thanks for making the offer and getting on board Leafs!!!
Oh Canada Intensifies.
P.S. Some of this was sarcastic. All of it was serious.
Robert Perry
>they should just give it away for free! lol I'd dump it to before I gave it to niggers
Jace Morris
>bags >containers for milk It's like you want to go in the oven
Alexander Morgan
>lol I'd dump it to before I gave it to niggers pretty much what a socialist government would say
Carson Ramirez
I don't know why but as a leaf I have been fucking my posts up all day but this guy seems to be doing it on purpose.
Caleb Martinez
>socialists don't exist to preserve niggers lolok
Lincoln Walker
Too bad overregulation doesn't allow for milk to ship directly to consumers because its unpasteurized. This isn't a supply or demand problem
Mason Robinson
Like much of the only bit of hunger left it is a distribution issue.
The same would happen under socialism, there is no means to efficiently ship it at this point.
Even worse under "communism" and Stalin's great "planned economies" it would have been distributed, there would be no demand, but everyone would write up ever increasing productivity and usage for fear of being purged. Then there would be even more farmers due to the planned economy expected to produce ever more milk for the masses that don't want / need it.
Imagine blaming capitalism and not all the red tape involved in donating food
Ian Diaz
I don't understand the logic behind fucking dumping milk and destroying food... why the fuck would farmers do this? Are they fucking retarded or something or is it just in their blood considering they did the same shit back in the great depression which worsened the hunger and starvation in america...
Brayden Gray
>grocery stores shelves are empty Except they're not.
Kayden Bailey
Cows need to be milked but they can't ship the milk to pasteurize because of stay at home orders for the pasteurization plants. Can't sell unpasteurized milk or donate it because of regulation.
Jaxon Kelly
Don’t care. You want it? Pay them.
Julian Wilson
lol how's that boot tasting?
Levi Russell
The demand hasn't dropped it has shifted. Supply chains that sell to restaurants can't get their bureaucratic shit together to sell to grocery stores. Or they don't have the correct jewish containers to sell their product in stores. It's a pure bureaucracy issue separate from capitalism/socialism.