Give them their land back
Give them their land back
A casino isn't enough for you?
"Their land" is just a social constructm
Which tribe? there were hundreds
Each tribe gets sovereignty over their pre-colonial land.
Nah if they want it they can fight for it (like they did thousands of years prior to the white man arrival)
We did, they're called reservations.
even back then they were NEETs
Nice bait retard, but the natives fought and stole land from one another long before the Europeans arrived.
Who do you think we should give the black hills to? The Sioux or the Cheyenne? Because it can’t be both.
No
>Give them their land back
Mongola?
>Each tribe gets sovereignty over their pre-colonial land.
But they didn't believe they owned the land.
Indigenous understanding of sovereignty and European understanding are different, it's about decolonial autonomy, not ethnonationalism.
Based.
>Indigenous understanding of sovereignty and European understanding are different, it's about decolonial autonomy, not ethnonationalism.
But White people were in North America first. Therefore the land belongs to White people for all time.
Besides, what about the land the American Indians sold/traded for what they considered a fair value, the land they didn't want, the land they weren't using and the land they stole/conquered from other American Indians?
Finally, the USA is a nation founded by White people for White people. Therefore the USA doesn't belong to American Indians.
It was never their land. They only inhabited tiny pockets of it. Most of North America was completely uninhabited wild nature when Europeans arrived. White people settled North America, they didn't conquer it. You conquer a city, not a forest.
They should have given it back to abbos, karma's a bitch.
will they then give it back to those they murdered to get it if i do? no? well then fuck them horse niggers.
>Blah blah blah.
White's genocides Natives and stole the land, end of conversation.
I suggest you get over it or we might finish the job.
>Gay chest-beating pride.
>Muh killing.
If it wasn't for the 1/2 blood laws existing natives would already be gone. To collect the gibmedats they must be at least 50% native blood. If you get rid of the restrictions (or get rid of the money) natives would disappear over night.
And I personally volunteer my dick as a tool
>>Blah blah blah.
Not an argument nor refutation of my post.
>White's genocides Natives
What about the American Indian genocide of their own people?
What about the American Indian genocide of White people?
>and stole the land,
Again, the land did not belong to the American Indians.
Besides, the American Indians came from Mongolia. Therefore they cannot be "native."
>end of conversation.
Wrong, you anti-White racist.
It’s not their land you fucking nigger. They were nomads.
>>Gay chest-beating pride.
>>Muh killing.
Seriously, who do you think you're converting to your anti-White mindset?
Who do you think you're getting to support your favorite little firewaterniggers?
If you really want to convert us to being anti-White and pro-Indian like you are, why can't you refute our positions and enforce your positions?
>Again, the land did not belong to the American Indians.
It did though. Because they were there and white's weren't.
>What about what about what about.
It's not complicated.
>White's genocides Natives
proof?
They fought us for the territory and lost. Wars have consequences. Deal with it, faggots.
I did refute your positions. You can't accept it. The conversation was finished here:
You like to lie and pretend that there's intricacies and things to talk about -there aren't.
Have you ever been to a reservation.
Most of them are Shitholes.
I don't talk to contrarians.
>Gay chest-beating pride.
That is really ironic coming from an indian.
LOL
Why is your voice shacking? Sounds like you're about to lose it.
No. Right of Conquest applies. Look it up, faggot.
>It did though.
What about the land the American Indians sold/traded for what they considered a fair value?
What about the land the American Indians didn't want?
What about the land the American Indians weren't using?
What about the land the American Indians stole/conquered from other American Indians?
What about the lands they lost due to warfare with White people?
What about the fact that American Indians didn't believe anyone could own the land?
>Because they were there and white's weren't.
What about the fact that Whites were in North America before the American Indians?
>It's not complicated.
Then why can't you answer the questions directly?
>I did refute your positions.
No, you didn't. You dismiss them out of hand by saying "bla bla bla"
>You like to lie and pretend that there's intricacies and things to talk about -there aren't.
Yes there is. Just because you claim my questions are pointless doesn't mean they are.
You don't want to answer the questions because you can't actually defend your position.
The only thing you can say is "NUH UH" and "UR WAYCISS".
Answer my questions directly you cowardly anti-White faggot.
>To collect the gibmedats they must be at least 50% native blood
Not even close to true.
You simply must be an enrolled member of a tribe. There is no blood % requirement at all. And if "natives" were required to be at least 50% native to be a tribal member every tribe would disappear overnight except for the sioux and navajo.
"50%"....lmao. You should see what passes for a "native american" at the tribes on both coasts. Its a big laugh.
WE WUZ INJUNZ N SHIETT
Give them their land back
>shacking?
lmao...you're so fucking stupid you don't know how to spell "shaking."
Give them your own land. Give them your house and all your belongings and maybe we will do the same. Inspire us faggot.
>What about the fact that Whites were in North America before the American Indians?
Meaningless and weak pro-white argument. And questions relating to after 1492 are irrelevant. White's should have come, then left, or had minimal colonization and left the Indians alone.
White's colonized America so they could set up Jewish Capitalism and work 65+ hours a week for almost nothing. White's are inferior.
>Not even close to true.
I had a friend who had always claimed to be like 1/32 or 1/64 indian...his sister even used it to get benefits at college. He was so proud of being a minuscule amount of indian and always got pissed if you insulted indians in any way.
Turns out years later his parents get a DNA test...not a lick of indian DNA in their blood. Their ancestor was a gigantic liar and claimed he was Indian so he could more easily "convert the natives" to Christianity. lol
>"50%"....lmao. You should see what passes for a "native american" at the tribes on both coasts. Its a big laugh.
sad but true. most tribes are just larping whites at this point. at best they are mestizo tier with the exception of tribes like the navajo who didnt have anything that whites wanted.
>shacking
>Sounds like you're about to lose it.
> shacking
That's what you live in down on the reservation right?
>Historylet
They didn't fight. They didn't see what there was to fight for. Owning land was a foreign concept to them. Sure, you could own that shirt, that tool, that house, but not land. To put it in context. Americas are so fucking huge and they were barely a few millions. So, if lands weren't profitable anymore, they could just move elsewhere, which is what they did most of the time. Even sedentary tribes moved every now and then. So when Europeans came over and told them: "Hey, if you move a bit to the west, I'll give you this." To them, it was profitable, because all they had to lose was the effort of moving, which they were already doing, so it was a win situation. The issue is that we see them, even today, as a monolithic society, when, in fact, they were, and still are, totally different tribes. So you believe because they "sold their lands" for a few shiny beads in the East you can claim all the lands. Then, since you kept pushing them (Americans, mostly), they eventually had nowhere to go. That's when some tensions started to rise, Americans took advantage of that to test out their new war-toys, provoking natives into wars they were bound to lose anyway. So fuck you.
Also, on the other side of the coin, since t hey didn't have any concept of ownership over the land, why would they have any claim to it now? Let's say you own a farm you live on. You don't know, but, right below it, there's the biggest gold mine ever. Would you be entitled to ownership over it, even if you were unaware of its existence?
>You misspelled a word.
Just have your meltdown already.
He's probably drunk right now.
I would be to if I got molested by an uncle.
>The U.S. military and Indians never fought
Put your helmet on, retard.
By your logic, third worlders are taking over Europe by Right of Conquest.
>Meaningless
But according to you, the entiety of North America belongs to the American Indians forever and ever, no matter what, simply because they set foot here "first".
>and weak
If it's weak why are you dismissing it out of hand and not refuting it?
>pro-white argument.
But there's nothing wrong with being pro-White.
>And questions relating to after 1492 are irrelevant.
Well it's a good thing then that Whites were here long before 1492.
>White's should have come, then left, or had minimal colonization and left the Indians alone.
Why?
>White's colonized America
...Because that's what Whites do. We build civilizations and make very place better with our very presence.
>so they could set up Jewish Capitalism
Wrong, Jews corrupted Capitalism. The USA was founded as a White Homeland.
>White's are inferior.
Then how come the American Indians are cavemen compared to Whites?
>Just have your meltdown already.
You're the one talking about how Whites are inferior and you can't even spell.
Shut up niggers, they living the dream
>As of 2011, there were 460 gambling operations run by 240 tribes,[1] with a total annual revenue of $27 billion.[2]
Extremly good for people living in huts 200 years ago
>Replying to individual sentences.
You're not fucking special. tl;dr.
>provoking natives into wars they were bound to lose anyway.
Read or don't reply. Lol. I meant to say
>They didn't fight at first
They had no intention of fighting.
They killed each other. Then lost a war to us. Fuck em. I have one line of ancestors 9 generations back that had a full blooded Creek. Other than that, I am as European as they come. Those ancestors became Americans and took to the comfy rural American lifestyle.
You don't want that. Because we'd then have to reconquer Europe.
>Haha its ours we wont it through strength of might
>NUUUUUUUUUUUUU STOP OUTBREEDING US ITS NOT FAIR
He can't even read LOL
>They had no intention of fighting.
But they did fight, and they lost. Tough shit.
Okay, as a 30 year old boomer, I have discovered that people who are telling other to take your meds, schizo are actually zoomers and not most likely jews and their shills as I had previously imagined.
If zoomers are truthful and have any dignity, they can confess in this thread that they infact use those terms in threads related with occult, symbolism, 5G, and any other topics they don't like.
How I came to this conclusion is because, I am in a d*scord server, it's a server to share memes and other stupid stuffs as any other group. It is mostly filled with zoomers and is a lot active due to lockdown. And today I raised a topic of circumcision and I faced a lot of hostility by fucking retarded zoomers! They are not willing to admit that it can cause loss in sexual desires, satisfaction and it is a genital mutation.
My point here is, zoomers are the most brainwashed generation of humanity has ever seen and they have a very closed mindset.
They have been made/turned this way by jews for their own self interest because they have realized that loosening up on goyim is not an option anymore.
Zoomers are the ultimate jewish servants.
They never fought for territory until the very end in the West though. Which goes according to your own premise:
>They fought for territories
Or, that means they have claim for any territory they didn't fight for, which is most of North America.
Weird how everything we're taught to believe about race flies out the window the microsecond natives are brought up. Especially here in Canada. I hear it on the radio all the time, people talking about how natives both need an ethnostate to survive and are entitled to one. They just don't use the word ethnostate. They also talk about demographic replacement like it's suddenly a bad thing. In fact I was just talking to someone about how most natives these days hardly look anything like the natives in photos and paintings depicting early contact. You basically have to go places European descendants have never been if you ever want to meet one, and he told me how that sad that is that there's native ethnicities being "erased." Same with all the native languages and alphabets going down the tubes. Try to apply the same thing to white people and suddenly it's not possible for stuff like this to happen within the universe's physical limits.
I really have to hand it to the Jews, this native shit is among their finest works.