What will truckers do after the self-driving industry makes their job obsolete?
What will truckers do after the self-driving industry makes their job obsolete?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
code
But it won't. It might let them sleep more is all, but it people on the road and anybody who wants the cargo delivered safely garunteed, will want a trucker at the wheel.
illegally sleep under their formerly mortgaged trailers.
What have coachman done after automobiles made them obsolete?
Now maybe truck trains will be more reliable because each tow can get some kind of individual steering system.
Here’s a tutorial for all truckers who want to code. youtu.be
>self-driving
>expects 80,000 pounds of shit not to wreck itself or require repairs
we're a LONG way off from this future user
Oh fuck off. I bet you couldn't tell a lambda from a functor.
>letting AI control orad trans, heavy haul operations, and other high stress tasks
yeah nah
Same way freight trains aren't driven by AI
wonly durgasoft saar
Wont happen in this lifetime. Even if they could sucessfully do it and even at a safer rate than a human trucker, the first catastrophe from one o these will kill it.
>orad trans
Road trains, excuse the dyslexia
>LEARN TO CODE BRO!!!
Fuck off smelly poo
Start blowing up highways, duh.
Well look I'm just saying that road trains probably have issues that individual power steering units could fix, it would be more expensive but safer and a truck driver would still the the driver.
They will be driven to drink.
Seethe more. Nagoor Babu is a coding guru.
I work for trucking comapny at an office. Self driving trucks are excitng, but NO ONE is worried about it now. Humans are still needed for a lot.
A self drivng truck can go 65mph in a straight line on an empty highway but not much else yet. Drivers are needed to deliver paperwork, slide tandems (did you realize that weight shifts during transit and this needs to be adjusted?) and count cases that are refused, making many other things that would be impossible for a truck alone to do.
Trust me, I wish it could all be automated. The hours of service bullshit (11hrs daily driving maximim by law) is a huge pain in the ass.
Only until the lawsuits cost less than employment.
But they're already doing it?
who said you have to learn, just code bro!!!
>ow maybe truck trains will be more reliable because each tow can get some kind of individual steering s
Nothing because of (((their))) plans for depopulation
Based Durgasoft
What will doctors do after they wasted 10 years studying only to be replace by an AI? After all diagnosing is pure logic, you have x + y+ z factor and you obtain D result, an algorithm could do that.
I just really doubt it, Railroad Engineers are still paid heavily and they travel on specially sectioned and signaled track. There's no way that something volatile like a truck on populated roads wouldn't have a man in there to say no if the computer does something retarded.
The self-driving car will never happen, due to litigation.
Any company buying or leasing a self-driving car is liable when that vehicle fucks up and kills a family of niggers. The manufacturer of the vehicle is also liable.
Right now, (barring mechanical failure) only the driver is liable, and the driver is not a billionaire, while the the trucking company, or taxi company, as well as the car manufacturer, would be liable, and they're very rich targets.
There are self-driving vehicles being toyed with now, and those that own them have to touch the driver's wheel every 5 minutes or so, or the car pulls over and stops...so what's the fucking point? You can't be drunk and let the car drive you home, you can't let the car drive you home while you read or sleep, the fucking vehicle is exactly useless.
It's a fantasy, and it will never be practical.
Throw rocks on trucks, nails infront of their tires and sabotage them.
start a gang who go around robbing self driving trucks.
wouldn't it be easy to just follow one of those trucks onto a deserted stretch of road, miles away from civilization and any police and then just pull up in front of it to stop it and raid it?
I'm gonna go full NEET/Nigger mode and live off the state.
Just do the next easiest job coding/designing shit on AutoCAD
what kind of people want vehicles of this tonage driving themselves with your family next to it?
kys bug man your pathetic lonely cyber punk fantasy isn't coming, ever
>self-driving industry
Will probably never happen. Likelihood is that it's a farce like AI in general.
Maintain the robots that maintain the trucks
>python
pathetic.
Drivers =/= mechanics
>self-driving industry makes their job obsolete?
>what will manufacturers do when 3D printing makes their job obsolete
This will happen right after we invent actual fusion reactors and replicators.
>adapt
same think that the horse transport industry had to do in 1900s when trucks where introduced
I would kill myself if i had to drive 11 hours a day.
I stock shelves 10 hours a day but that is actually bearable because it is busy work and time passes quickly.
>until the lawsuits cost less than employment.
So never then?
>Likelihood is that it's a farce like AI in general.
This.
Google is AI, and look how terrible it is at everything.
We are 40+ years away from that.
Self driving trucks may come into play but people won't let them on the road without a manual overdrive
>what kind of people want vehicles of this tonage driving themselves with your family next to it?
what kind of people want methed up truck drivers driving heavy trucks?
Meth
You know I used to laugh at Python too until I found out some of its features. Like you can atomize a number of expressions just by putting parens around it. I don't know that's actually pretty cool honestly. The in keyword is nice and it's just a language that works well for what it does. I can see why people like using it for small projects.
Truckers already have accidents though. How hard is it to make a machine that makes less errors than a human being?
Did you know that the horse & buggy were the first self-driving vehicle?
We've had Amish folk arrested for drunk driving, because they get drunk, fall asleep in the buggy, and let the horse take them home.
They're still the operator, and still liable.
Liability is the reason self-driving vehicles will fail, and liability is not going anywhere.
I think organized crime is going to love self driving trucks
>bump into self driving truck gping down remote highway
>truck programmed to pull over if involved in accident
>chop open lock and raid trailer
>gone 10 minutes before police arrive on scene
At this rate most jobs will be made obsolete. But if we abolish all personal taxes (income, estate, property, sales, etc) and limit usury it won't be a big deal and many people will be able to leave the workforce and retire.
Self driving can only cover so much. All it takes is a few states to ban it. One simply doesnt have 7 tons move at 60 mph safely.
I think AI is the future, but at least for the next 20 years humans will be WAY safer and AI companies will be exposed to lawsuits. Hopefully that delay is enough time for them to transition jobs.
Sometimes I feel swood by accelerationists because it feels like horrible layoffs happen no matter what, but rushing into AI trucking is too much of an unemployment risk to rush.
Ride the truck. You really want a self driving truck that's almost unmanned?
Nobody to keep an eye on your assents. Nobody to call in assistance if it goes offline? Nobody to troubleshoot or take manual control should something go wrong?
Alot harder.
But they compliment each other. Alot of trucking accidents are caused because of bad road conditions or being too near cars, or just the driver being too exausted from the hours they have to put in, the automation control is put in as a tool for the driver's benefit.
They're not. They're running tests on desert roads for (((VICE))) documentaries on (((HBO))). They've been doing this shit forever. How's your solar powered car doing?
despite typing like a drunkard, I hope you still get my point.
how will the automated trucks fend of the roaming bands of raiders in the coming apocalypse.
Liberals said manufacturing would be replaced by robots. They were wrong, it was a front for outsourcing our own manufacturing. I don't know what their end game is with this. I think it's to get a traditionally white career to have no more white people want to do it so they can use a lack of drivers as an excuse for immigration when they can't find enough drivers since they told all the citizens to stop driving trucks because the job will be obsolete soon
The bar on the front signifies that road trains do not stop for unfortunate souls who do not get out of the way in time.
>it’s okay to replace hundreds of stockbrokers moving tens of millions of dollars with AI
>but this one big rig carrying some steaks is too valuable and requires a human
Sure buddy
>Nobody to keep an eye on your assents.
Like a camera?
>Nobody to call in assistance if it goes offline?
Like an automated messaging and reponse system?
>Nobody to troubleshoot or take manual control should something go wrong?
Like a remote driver?
Latency may be an issue with that last one but you could always make sure at least one operator is at safe distance or something. Most likely they'd just do corrections anyway
>Truckers already have accidents though.
And when they do, you can sue the independent truck driver.
If it was a driverless truck, I could sue the trucking company AND the truck manufacturer, both very wealthy targets, both large, wealthy companies that jurors won't think twice about hitting for multiple millions each.
It's the litigation that will crush this industry, why is that not obvious?
Why would you use a remote driver? Why would you risk going through a radio/cell deadzone?
> self-driving industry
Entire food supply chain dependent on GPS and computer. What can possibly go wrong?
Seems a simple choice if the only other option is a third world migrant who’ll kill an entire bus of white athletes. Give us cletus
Sure the coach man kept his job, well that's if he learned how to drive an auto.
But what about the stableman? What about the rancher? On the grand stage the number of jobs lost is nominal but when you consider who gained and who lost its a different story.
I believe the number of lazy trailer trash, apartment dwellers, and porch monkeys is equal to the number of simple jobs lost. Some jobs just require too much.
Google isn't AI. They outsource everything to "reviewers" to ensure accuracy.
All of AI is like this. They claim that some people provide an input as a training model but in reality the training never goes away. It's still people doing everything but it lets them lie and sell people a new product.
For example, Alexa. It has been well documented now that poorly paid Indian workers are laughing at Americans private conversations as they're actually the ones behind Alexa.
All AI is a lie. It creates a new service industry where people too lazy to type a question into a search engine can have someone in India do it for them without that person feeling guilty or that their privacy is invaded.
Look up companies like Leapforce and others that are used to find cheap contractors to review search results all day for popular terms. What is recaptcha?
There will be no self driving semi trucks. Ever. The likely more relevant question is, truck drivers what are you going to do when people don't have money anymore to buy the goods you're driving around?
>Stock Brokers are anything but scummy salesmen taking a commission
Brother, I think you might have missed who is actually keeping the country running over the last month.
Sentry guns.