Is 5G harmful to humans?

Isn't it made specifically to do that though?

Yes it's called "Literally every science book on fundamentals of radio waves published in the past century"

I need an actual source bud

>Isn't expanding the used frequencies for cell phones designed to break the laws of physics?
No

It's clear 5g because it's the legal allowance of using the 5ghz spectrum, you dumb fucking nigger. This was already being used by over the air television before digital broadcast

Ive just been redpilled on EMF and i realize that i have been sleeping next to a router (1 meter/3feet) for the past 3 years, could i have gotten cancer by now, unironic question..

Attached: 279-2798363_452-kb-png-apu-apustaja-fat.png.jpg (920x919, 183.2K)

>humans?
Shouldnt you ask about Amerimutts?

>5ghz spectrum
Ah no.

Please provide a source, you calling me a nigger won't do anything. Convince me because I want to know

Ah yes, you're a fucking retard nigger who doesn't even know what these terms mean.

>you calling me a nigger won't do anything
So won't providing a source, ameritards gonna ameritard

Attached: 15839420001410.jpg (823x937, 130.12K)

shortening the wavelength (which is what's happening here), means that you can go higher bandwidth and throughput, but at a cost of distance and travel-ability.

Shorter wavelengths will be stopped by things like brick wall, concrete etc. easier because they are shorter, whereas long wavelengths like AM radio can go through entire neighbourhoods no problem. You can't engineer a fucking wavelength to go through certain things

5ghz is used for wifi routers, 5g is more around 60 ghz on average.

Routers called "5g" mean 5ghz, 5G means "fifth generation"

Answer my question and provide me a source that it is harmless. You calling me a retard nigger does nothing at all

No goy

That's why 5G uses a carrier wave, right?

>5g is more around 60 ghz on average.
[citation needed]

You still haven't proven that it's harmless.

And i wasn't going to

All I ask is for someone to come forth and prove to me with hard evidence that it's harmless.

Calling me a retarded nigger isn't evidence, either.

A single person, anyone.

Well lets see.
I remember when Doctors and scientists would appear on TV and tell you there was no link between cigarettes & lung cancer.
When they said Thalydamide was safe for pregnant women to take.
When they said fluoride in water had no ill effects.
You see the pattern right?

I just want someone to give me some studies proving it's safe.

But everyone keeps calling me a nigger everytime I ask

The bandwidth it provides for new forms of surveillance are harmful. Get ready for ID2020 chips, police drones, internet of things appliances in public that spy on every move and sound you create, etc. Basically every schizoid tinfoiler's nightmare come true.

Attached: 1518007700291.png (306x306, 112.17K)

Just the comservatives? All of the masses are cattle you ignorant nigger.

I read about tests on mice, and there were mice that got testicular cancer from it.

Sort of but nobody openly defends their own golem-hood the way the American conservative does

There's money involved friend. Sadly people will always follow that even to their own detriment.
What's the difference between a drug dealer and a pharmaceutical rep.?
If the rep. sells harmful drugs to kids he gets a promotion & a bonus. The drug dealers boss might chop his nuts off and feed him to his dogs.

ITT People who did no pay attention in high school physics

It's somewhat related to the map of corona cases and fatalities. Used as a homing signal to target certain incorrigible debtors/borrowers

it's a delicious bio-financial weapon, better than max security debtors prisons... youtu.be/5QNdJuHZv5E youtu.be/WVW_ojMziNY youtu.be/3JS8CW6dq1I youtu.be/s_UNtWPS8dc