People who protest their freedom to go out are correct.
Freedom is the ability of the human being to decide on the course of his life. The government exists to provide tools that help this end.
The fact that people are kept in their homes is a civic act, not a legal one. Civility is a construction where the majority benefits from specific actions.
If people in total freedom decide to go out, become infected and die, that is the cost of their freedom. If the government doesn't want people to go out so as not to saturate the health systems, the problem is the incapacity of these systems and not the people who demand their freedom.
Therefore, the cost of freedom is the spread of a disease.
At the same time, the reduction of this disease is only the result of two realities:
a) You live in a tyrannical country. b) You have civility.
If they have a death wish, I don't care. The problem is if they get infected they'll spread it to others.
Aaron Flores
I don't give a fuck about you. Give me liberty and give me death.
Colton Phillips
Go back you filthy faggot
Michael Fisher
#mybodymychoice
Nathaniel Edwards
>yes goyim, kill all of your small businesses so the (((ultrarich))) corporations can replace them >sacrifice the old for the young? No no, you must sacrifice your young for the old Fuck off
But that's a discussion that they have to have between citizens. The government cannot compel people not to go out. Once you go to the government to regulate what is and what is not allowed, freedom is reduced.
People who don't want to be infected don't have to go out.
