Why do Christcucks continue to be slaves?

reasonable but you can't reason with people whose very foundation you find unreasonable. It wont go anywhere.

this

You should read the thread before deferring to quotes.

He's not talking to you, much like the light doesn't interact with the darkness it is dissipating.

Whenever the Gossip speaks, you disappear.

mussolini was a faggot, a scammer, a failure and a traitor, if you wanna take inspiration from him try to never follow in his steps

k

CHRISTKEKS TURNING TO A JEW ON A STICK FOR SALVATION.
ASK ME HOW I KNOW YOU'RE POOR

Attached: 27628292.jpg (179x282, 7.71K)

why did you reply to my post american retard

all fields

Attached: hide_the_thread.png (30x29, 1.26K)

I was reasonable and tame in my post. The fact you need to hide it is sad honestly.

The reason we have many sects of christianity is for the goy endlessly kill themself's, instead of recreating the council Nicaea. They will never allow the leaders of every major christian sect to sit down and talk over everything, they need the fight to continue eternally. The goys will forever argue over everything only to finally find a solution to the arguments, then they will be banned from sharing the solution. I'm a occultist not a fucking atheist, so don't fucking post that goddam fedora meme.

Attached: 1570370757320.jpg (3820x2964, 2.36M)

because they have a Lord.the same mentality,arabs and jews.

I know it applies to Jews and Arabs as well. My post content pretty much targets all semitic religions but I focused on Christianity since it holds the largest population of whites.

>You can still believe in God or Gods without submitting to the religious dogmas that dominate the world today. I'm fond of ancient Roman polytheism as it portrays the Gods as strong and virtuous men who are to be admired which would give direction to many.
Are you fucking retarded? Religion isn't just your favorite lore. Other than your fucking larper gods there are really eloquent proofs for the existence of God.
Do you honestly think we can just override the commands of God? That we are smarter than him and that God is wrong about morals, but your edge teen nationalism is okay? Humble yourself, fool.

Every time I read one of these posts about "cucktianity" it's one of those fucking idiotic larpers who just chases power for the sake of it. You don't understand the first thing about Christianity, you haven't figured out why something is good, where you ground your morality, why people started to believe in God in the first place and why the current world religions are still going strong while your larper shit is considered a joke.
Christians weak, Pagans strong is such a pathetic take. Will you honestly just ignore the thousands of years of war fought by Christians? "Turn the other cheek" applies to social life, being a sperg in your society is stupid. Christians are by no means pacifists and everyone who says they are is a new age faggot who thinks Jesus just offered "good advice".

All of that writing and not a single piece of evidence which you claim to have. Look, you have a fundamentally different perspective on life. That perspective is not grounded in the scientific method which has been guiding our decision since the enlightenment era. I see religion as nothing more than a power structure for those in leadership and as a tool for coping for the lesser people because to me that is all it is. That's why I give alternatives which would also sate the holes in the people who crave this occult/paranormal cosmological rhyme and reason.

The fact you had to tell me there is evidence of God and then go on to provide 0 evidence is laughable. Also, calling people edgey teens because they don't subscribe to your beliefs wont win converts and isn't very Christ-like.

Fascism is not grounded in religion. It's the exact opposite. It sought to replace religion for a love of country, tradition, and state. You also mention that Christianity and other semitic cults are growing whereas atheism and other non-mainstream alternatives are dying when that simply isn't the case. It is growing rapidly -- particularly in developed, first-world nations. The only place semitic religions are still as popular than ever before is the land of the dune coons.

You know when Neizche said God is dead, he wasn’t celebrating, he was lamenting that fact.

If you are non religious or something of that similarity, what makes your moral system different from Ragnar Red beards, Anton Laveys or Karl Marx?

Cool story bro. Now repent you manchild

Is it logical to use the scientific method to verify the scientific method is true?

Or is the scientific methods validity something that you take on faith?

Oh, I'm sorry. I'm compiling my argument right now.

First of all you need to understand yourself with the concept of Divine Simplicity. Because as long as you think of God as some kind of powerful alien, some cosmic superhero like Thor or Zeus or even Santa Claus, you are starting with wrong assumptions and obviously you will end up with wrong conclusions. I assume you have something like that in mind:
1. God is a magic skyfairy.
2. Magical creatures.
3. Therefore, God doesn't exist.

Premise 1 is simply false. God is not a magic creature. In fact, he isn't a creature at all. He is the creator and everything else is created by him. This means that God isn't dependent/contingent on anything. For example if God were blue, that would mean that color needs to exist before God, that color is more fundamental.
But that would just introduce the question of why God is blue, what made him that way. What composed him in such a way.
That goes for any feature, for any constraint. God is not constraint or dependent or contingent on anything. He just is. He is omnipresent, because he isn't contrained by space. Like how math is not here or there, God isn't here or there.
Now: If God isn't in any way, it still leaves the question whether God is or isn't, whether he exists at all.
I answer: No. God is being/existence itself. It isn't possible for him to not exist, because "being" is "what he is". It is his essence.
Just like triangles necessarily have 3 sides, God necessarily exists. Because that is what existence does, it exists.
Otherwise you're asking "what makes reality real?" - Some more fundamental reality? No. Because then you have to account for the more fundamental reality. It simply goes ad absurdum.

Now, it is quite a jump to go from fundamental reality, the ground of being, subsistent existence itself to the personal God.
There are a couple of things we usually attribute to God, however, these follow logically.

(1/2)

It is more complicated than that. Nietzche referred to God as being dead not because he believed God to have been alive in the first place but that the enlightenment had essentially crippled the faith in God among many. This left a hole open for which people can implement their own moral authority as they are no longer bound to the authority of an almighty deity. This is also a factor for the rise of ideologies like Fascism and Communism. These ideologies were meant to fill the gap but collapsed under the weight of war, neoliberalism, etc. Neoliberalism has become the prevailing ideology that drives most decision-making in the West. It is what underpins our nation and pushes us to intervene in foreign countries.

Those figures you presented are different in their beliefs which should be very easy to see. What is even more apparent is where they draw their moral authority. Marx drew his authority from the working class whereas Lenin drew it from the state. I don't know much about Lavey besides that he founded the Church of Satan but he was not an actual believer in Satan as presented in the Bible. If he does in-fact believe in the Satan within the Bible then he draws his authority from Satan.

The scientific method gets its authority from practical use and continued successful application which you could call it verifying itself.

What you are describing is not the Christian interpretation of God but an abstract interpretation which is common among deists like many of the American Founding Fathers.

regular humans are constantly controlled by their passions and instincts as if they were animals, the more they endulge in hedonsism the more they beast like they become

So if Christianity had a practical use and a successful application, would it also not just as useful as the scientific method

That is why we need a moral structure to underpin the country and hinder hedonism. This is what Mussolini's Fascism does.

Secondly. You need to remove this notion that God can be scientifically proven. That is a categorical error. It's like saying "You cannot hear the color blue, therefore blue doesn't exist."
The existence of God is a philosophical question.

> is not grounded in the scientific method
yes, obviously. Science is only part of what we can know. For example we cannot scientifically prove "science is the only way to guide our decisions". What about all statements about ethics, beauty, logic and math. Science relies on those in order to bring us further knowledge.
I'd recommend you do an epistemology.
Also you might want to look into the is-ought gap, which precisely describes your problem. Science can only tell you what is, but not what ought to be. Which is something you propose in your post. Or can you scientifically tell me why we ought to do what you want?
Furthermore you just showed your belief in Roman gods is pathetic larping.

> I see religion as nothing more than a power structure for those in leadership and as a tool for coping for the lesser people because to me that is all it is.
No, this has been refuted over and over again. The same can literally be said about atheism, coping with the reality of objective morality and hell. The psychology of individual humans has nothing to do with objective truth.

>Also, calling people edgey teens because they don't subscribe to your beliefs wont win converts and isn't very Christ-like.
No, people obviously failed with the nice way, so other ways are now appropriate.

>That's why I give alternatives which would also sate the holes in the people who crave this occult/paranormal cosmological rhyme and reason.
Occultism is literally larping. The Church of Satan doesn't believe in Satan. Every Satanist is immediately confronted with the question "If Satan exists, does God exist?" Yes. "Is God stronger?" Yes. "Is Satanism therefore futile and retarded?" Yes.

Well, Christianity's practical uses are metaphysical. They are to soothe a persons' psyche and even drive them to be better people. I don't see that as being equal to the scientific method which grounds real world experiments and devices. But that does that the scientific methods tends to leave a hole in the metaphysical. This is basically a hole of meaning, purpose, etc.

Fascism, National Socialism, cultural and economic Marxism all in a way are a form of saviorless Christianity

There is an original sin, the wages of sin is death, anyone who breaks the covenant or is considered evil with the state is either arrested or put to death.

I acknowledged the hole science leaves for metaphysical pursuits but, again, I don't believe that hole needs to be filled by semitic religions or any 'religion' (depending on what is meant by religion).

You are forgetting Neoliberalism and it is apparent why you left it out.

When you say real, what do you mean?

Does something being predictable make it real?

If someone being a Christian leads that person to having kids and being a healthy member of society, wouldn’t that be an evolutionary win?

I interpret neoliberalism as a form of Marxism were corporations take the role of the state