Name ONE wrong thing in this chart

Do you lock your doors user?

> we must support LGBT.

Fucking Kike Shill. To hell with you.

>lgbt acceptance
>instead of wanting to do everything to make them straight so they have a chance to, you know, make families

>race cooperation
>when in reality you would balk if I said that we cannot have race cooperation as long as jews exist because they created the ADL in response of ONE single jew being hanged instead of the two blacks he wanted to be hanged and they have been race baiting ever since, which was 1915, aka 105 years now.

Guess y'all are too anarchistic to be honest, cause fuck that sort of integrity, right?

Attached: and_then_I_was.png (750x536, 558.23K)

I don’t.

Section 6

Vigilante Justice has been shown to work. I think the Ken Rex McElroy incident is proof of this. And nobody could deny theat there has been criminals who deserve harsher or way more lenient sentences than they deserve.
As for possibility of more tyrannical systems of government showing up, there would have to be resistance from anarchists. Working in a cooperative is much easier and you benefit more than what we get in capitalism, so the need to steal would be nullified. Many people will be satisfied with life.

Yes. But I've heard that a lot of people in Iceland don't because they live in tight-knitted communities, something that we advocate for in anarchism.

How would anarchism handle a global pandemic?

Attached: Screenshot_2020-04-19 are-we-heading-for-a-coronavirus-pandemic-331442 webp (WEBP Image, 640 × 360 pixels).png (640x360, 317.09K)

1. I agree.
2. Though I agree with the idea of a cooperatives hierarchy is natural and necessary.
There are those that are naturally more suited to lead and others to follow.
The issue we have now is the unnatural hierarchy wherein those who are not suited to lead occupy the middle management.
We need effective hierarchy, not the destruction of it.
3. I agree.
4. I agree.
5. Haha no. The LGBTPs serve only to destroy society.
6. Again no. Biology applies to humanity.
7. Not sure on this one.
8. I agree. Lynching rapists is far more efficient.

>white privilege
dropped.
Prove niggers aren't simply dumber.

youtube.com/watch?v=tI1rbIYwK4A

It's a racially homogeneous community, you dumb fuck.

>A lot of people in Iceland don’t lock our doors because the community is high trust
Because everyone is white.

>remove industry and save the ecosystem
its really sad some people's logic only goes this far

The flaw in your logic is the belief in equality. You assume that all anarchists would equally share your beliefs and goals. This is not the case. Some people would have a wildly different point of view. This is due the reality of our individuality. We are all subject to our unique experience. This leads us to see the world and the future we want from many different angles. Your idea would bring utter chaos on the world.

1. Agree
2. Disagree, a lack of heirarchy and organization means a lack of efficiency, meaning work doesn't get done as quickly, and is harder to acquire in the first place.
3. Agree
4. Agree, but for different reasons. The earth is a resource, and managing it to ensure that we have continued access in the future is sound thinking.
5. HORSESHIT. Justice viewed through a subjective lens isn't justice, it's vengeance. Grow up.
6. Agree, but for different reasons. The premise of "white privilege" is inherently flawed, but I agree that racial difference (usually cultural) are used to sow division where there need be none.
7. Disagree. Theft is inherently immoral, you're not Robin Hood.
8. Horseshit, see 5.

It's literally tribalism as found in rural africa, only dressed up in western jargon.

-Tight-knit communities where the individual disappears inside the larger clan: every tribe ever. I have no idea why all you fuckers glorify this concept when you come to Yas Forums exclusively because you refuse to conform to the society around you.

I can't say that I fundamentally disagree with any point, but I do have some questions.

- could a cooperative form an internal hierarchy similar to a contemporary capitalist firm, so long as it was subject to some kind of regular democratic ratification? I.e. the factory votes to put a few of the smartest people in the role of managers and executives, who do less labor and take a greater share of the factory's revenue?

Could the cooperate vote to make this system permanent?

- What happens to individuals or nuclear families who prefer not to live in communal arrangements?

-when the community comes together to democratically make decisions, are there any limits on the scope of what they can decide upon? Would anything like a "bill of rights" exist to protect individuals against the power of the majority?

Anarchism is impossible.

Anarchists surely aren’t the best fighters though.

Attached: 60B2C2FE-E6B1-4892-9A95-44D62DF6AEEE.jpg (1024x655, 87.15K)

Uncle Ted would disagree with you on many of those. Read “the systems greatest trick” an essay by him. Fag acceptance and anti-racism serve the system.

Not really the reason. A lot of people from different races have tight-knitted communities. We live in a time where many accept people from different races. We have progressed a lot in just a few decades, so this unhealthy tribalism is dying. It is not inherent to us.

1) This is only true up to Dunbar's number. Humans are physiologically limited in our ability to care about and trust others. If you get too many people together, it becomes possible to become "anonymous" in the sense that most people wouldn't recognize you on the street as the person who robbed that store yesterday.

2) Democracy leads to tyranny of the majority and tragedy of the commons. In a work co-op no one works hard, everyone splits the existing wealth, and no new wealth is generated

3) I support this

4) Anarchy doesn't prevent Eco-governance. It actually prevents it, making it possible for someone to dump radioactive sludge into the well (who will stop them? There's no laws)

5) LGBT are bad for society

6) Race realism

7) Tragedy of the commons

8) Vigilante justice leads to overreaction, emotional reaction, and double jeopardy

7 of your 8 points are bullshit

Tell that to the Jews that own the banks and media outlets.

looks like some commie bullshit tagged with the label of "anarchism"

faggot

>A lot of people from different races have tight-knitted communities
I've never seen one.
>It is not inherent to us
Then why have we organized in this way for thousands of years?