Luc Montagner, Medecine Nobel Prize laureate after isolating the HIV claims
>That Covid 19 was created by the Whuan P4 laboratory in an effort of developing an aids vaccine.
And that in order to do so
>Chinese researchers from the Whuan P4 laboratory who have specialised themselves in the study of Corona viruses since the early 2000s have inserted HIV RNA sequences in a virus of the aforementioned family.
FUCKING CHINKSADFDHASHDFGJG
wow, very interesting picture.
i'm not sure what it is, but something about it is very appealing to me.
>laureate
He also said people should not fear the virus, because the man-made sequences will disappear quickly as the virus mutates and reverts back to the wild-type. He called on China to apologize and admit responsibility.
Luc Montagnier is a senile 87 years old man. The Indian study was unscientific, biased and failed study he is just parroting it and adds his flavor of 5G water memory as in the middle.
Pleb
Make them apologize.
Make them ALL APOLOGIZE.
I'M FREE NO COVID19
>Luc Montagner
You mean the guy who thinks teleportation and all sorts of other whacky crazy shit can happen?
en.wikipedia.org
Also, almost all Coronavirus' have trace elements of HIV / AIDs that are found in nature. SARS Cov and MERS cov both had them as well.
>Finnish education
lol.
Bullshit the chinks wouldn't validate it so they had to retract it.
imagine edging yourself so that you were ready to cum, then bursting out of the closet and ramming your pre lubricated cock deep inside her rectum and instantly blowing your load. Then running away, obviously. She would be so shocked.
Wrong. The whole scientific community denounced it so they had to retract it. It's a study they made in 5 big minutes(BLAST is basically an excel sheet comparison program) and it's been two months and nothing since then? Almost like they are full of shit.
WRONG
the chinks have the last word in this "research" now.
why else would you have an international panic over something that kills less than the annual flu?
>unscientific
Okay, Francois. Continue believing main-stream science and its COVID boogeyman narrative.
nypost.com
Kek, studies of the coronavirus are not peer reviewed meaning they are worth as much as a Facebook post. Preprints are free to put online. And yeah, two months and a half, and nothing but a retraction.
I am talking about the Indian study wtf are you on about?
KEK Chinese having control over the narrative is worse than they're hybrd HIV coironavirus.
keep blowing Xi
Over 800 peer reviewed documents were created within a week when Xi allowed information to flow to the WHO.
The virus was taken apart and sequenced back into vaccine molecules within hours. Get fucked frog.
Those works were not peer reviewed either, like the Indian study.
> sequenced back into vaccine molecules
Man you craycray.
Is it a chinese website or a chinese biologist?
archive.is
Hm, lot of gnats in this room, let's spray it out
动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
Ahhh there. Carry on, gentlemen
>archive.is
(((
American Association for the Advancement of Science)))
nice try Schlomo
We've already mapped out the entire human genome, and mapped out almost every major virus that we know of.
It's not hard to figure this shit out idiot. The only major issue is getting the right vaccine and clinical trials for humans. I know you're an impatient man child, but calm the fuck down.
What are you even arguing about craycray?
You know putting a few parenthesis to an organisation's name is not an argument?
You know appealing to authority isn't either, right?
>What are you even arguing about craycray?
The virus wasn't created in a lab, and it's not some Frankenstein monster that you are trying to push.
Where am I appealing to authority? I gave you arguments, showed you someone who is not anonymous that shared my opinion based on facts.
What did you do?
> g-guise that senile old man is speaking of the virus being a HIV chimera out of his ass from a flawed study so that must be true since he discovered HIV
Ironie quand tu nous tiens.
Hey craycray, you realise I never said that?
some guy who says no that's not right is your source.
then he attempts to explain it away.
Got proof?
Hoemw are people blowing xi idiot. Its a fucking debate. Fuck you.
How are people blowing xi idiot. Its a fucking debate. Fuck you.
A guy who happen to be a literal who but has enough of a resume that his opinion should not be discarded outright with parenthesis.