Will we look back on natsoc with the same cringe we do new atheism?

why would the people in the middle of the crowd turn up for that parade? seems like it would be pretty boring

all around me are familiar copes, worn out copes....

Natsoc is just to cheer and support for your home team, i cant see that growing old anytime soon

Attached: 1580316646547.jpg (1024x794, 129.59K)

Seen this webm for years, still breaks my heart. I know that I would have the same mental break that guy was having.

Probably not.
new atheism was cringe from the start.
How can you start a movement around not believing something?
That's retarded.

Because they were a free people, mentally and physically, that hadn't been seen for millenia.

The two don’t exclude each other.

>seems like it would be pretty boring

Ok Chang.

No, never. Nat soc, in it's very essence, is based and redpilled. Nothing will change that. It is an objective and eternal truth. New atheism is intrinsically gay and cringe and bluepilled. And nothing will change that either.

Attached: 1545031025635.gif (245x250, 1.86M)

>seeing your country's messiah
>boring

Christcucks are cringier than atheists, by a wide margin.

Attached: 1584870545515.png (1533x824, 50.17K)

Well that guy is a better person than you, and you are already more cringe than him. So, I don't care.

Watch out, its Manolo Gómez, the aryan keyboard warrior

yes it would be boring and you wouldn't even be able to see him if you were that far back. why wouldn't i just stay home and hear about it on the wireless

>It is an objective and eternal truth
prove it

>will we look back on natsoc with the same cringe we do new atheism?
No, don't worry.

Hitler kept the number of bananas in his rectum relatively low, while keeping overall nation aesthetics high.

Attached: bbd9dba4ce1b1bbcfa140c738a76ef73b47f3c94182f684411d1e46b2778460e.jpg (1400x947, 233.57K)

Read Hitler or James Mason, who both honored Christ to the highest degree. Both two of the greatest white men who ever lived, you fat shit coping atheist.

I'm an atheist too, and no, you're wrong. Atheism is way more cringy. At least I can admit that.
Nat soc claims are based on truth. That people are unequal. Modern political thought is based on subjective and wishful thinking as well as lies about everyone being the same.

The truth will never be cringy (except for atheism, which is true but also kind of gay and cringy).

>Nat soc claims are based on truth
but all political ideologies claim this? why is yours actually true

Well, you're right, I'm making a claim based on my own perspective, but it's not only me. I'm sure you agree too.
I'll ask you this: Do you acknowledge differences in individuals as well as cultures and ethnic groups and do you acknowledge that it's good for each person and group to strive for greatness?

I mean, it's more complex than that, but surely you would accept the fundamental tenants of nat soc thought. Or at least that they are based on truth?

Nationalism is based on science and statistics

Others are based on feelings and money

Ok panchito deja de proyectar tus miserias al resto.

No, because the right wing is the answer to the failures of new atheism and other such leftist positions

Vas de vikingo de ojos azules y seguro que eres más marrón que el pakistaní del kebab jajajaja que pena das maricón

>Vas de vikingo

Analfabeto de mierda, para ser nacional socialista no hay que ser "vikingo".

>seguro que eres más marrón que el pakistaní del kebab

Das penita. Sigue proyectando,sudaca.

>Do you acknowledge differences in individuals as well as cultures and ethnic groups
100% yes

>do you acknowledge that it's good for each person and group to strive for greatness
again yes

but these questions don't necessarily lead to national socialism which is a very particular ideology. Also these points don't even necessarily lead to ethnonationalism, might be a bit counter intuitive but if living in a multi racial society was beneficial for everyone then both questions would be satisfied without the need for ethnats. not saying that's true but the fundamental questions you've given dont lead me to a natsoc conclusion

Hitler was not a christian you cocksucking, jew-loving, faggot.

He paid christfaggotry a little bit of lip-service during the early years because he knew the majority of Germans had fallen under it's spell and would be turned-off if he was openly hostile towards it.

Every Hitler quote that is seemingly pro-christian is from the 1920's. If you look at his quotes after that point, they are ALL anti-christian.

Hitler hated christianity, according to Joseph Goebbels, Martin Bormann, and Albert Speer.

Read "Hitler's Table Talk" you fuckin' empty-headed faggot. It's a collection of monologues delivered by Adolf Hitler from the Wolf's Lair, which were transcribed from 1941 to 1944. He reveals his true feelings on the topic.

And pic-related was written in a letter from Hitler to Albert Speer.

Attached: hitler.png (489x274, 73.92K)

Nobody expects you to be great, kiwi. Stay home.

he got donations for a website he never delivered, just kept the money lol

i already do

Va va pero el que proyecta eres tu tanto llamar sudaca, no me extrañaría que seas un peruano o algo, en fin José Antonio Primo de Rivera, mucha suerte con tu nacional socialismo y con tus sueños de una España blanca, y que no se te olviden las pastillas de la esquizofrenia jajaja

Attached: averagespanishpoluser.gif (480x270, 1.6M)

Yes
Take a few months off this place and come back
Even though I'm still holding nationalist, anti-zionist, anti-progressive beliefs I can't believe how many delusional cringe LARPers this place has