Marx rejected equality: Posting "MARX WAS RIGHT ABOUT EQUALITY" could provoke the following reaction.
-People who think Marx supported equality (eaglitariansim) might make themselves look like idiots by saying something like 'Marx was right, we need equality'. -People who are against equality, icluding marxists, might use the opportunity to criticise equality leading to... -People who support equality might find themselves defending equality, a position which they hardly ever find themselves in.
Well I thought that there are liberals who think Marx is great but know nothing about his ideas, so highlighting what Marx thought about equality might yeild some results.
Xavier Edwards
100% of normies have no clue about the writings of Marx. Yas Forums doesn't know anything either.
Brandon Robinson
Lurk moar
Tyler Gray
Very True but there are lots of movements that promote 'Equality' that are also full of supposed Marxists, so exploitling this irreconcilable divide is surely a good thing.
John Evans
>Sitting at the feet of Jews and learning their teachings No thanks
Marx rejected equality as a construct in class society not as a racial or whatever you guys would want to misuse it for.
Levi Reyes
Commie Marx-fans will see this poster and feel emboldened by reading his name in the same sentence with the word “equality” Will they use this in an argument and expose their ignorance? Unlikely. If they did, would it defeat themselves? No.
Dominic Hill
That's where you are wrong, Marx regects equality, or more to the point egalitarianism full stop. This is becaue Marx wants to abolish class. Multiculutralism is at its heart egalitarian and should be rejected by all Marxists.
The point of this is to try and exploit an irreconcilable problem of movements that are filled with Marxists/supposedly are Marxist but are also pro equality.
Ian Clark
It worked like a charm last time and was funny as hell tho
Yes equality as a construct full stop, I mean to get everyone on a flat level of everything is of course ridiculous. That doesn't mean he believes in race realism, social darwinism or any other theories of inherent inequality.
Caleb Russell
>That doesn't mean he believes in race realism, social darwinism or any other theories of inherent inequality. Yes I recognise this, however this really is not the point.
Ethan Hernandez
and yet here you are, >look goys, all I'm trying to say is that Marx did bring up some pretty valid points
what's the purpose of this image then? what idea does it push you want to push the marxist opinion on equality ok cool but this is Yas Forums so I doubt it
>In Marxist theory, communism is based on a principle whereby access to goods and services is based on free and open access (often referred to as distribution based on one's needs in the literature); Marx stressed free access to the articles of consumption.[21] The "equality" in a communist society is thus not about total equality or equality of outcome, but about equal and free access to the articles of consumption.[22] Marx argued that free access to consumption would enable individuals to overcome alienation. This is acceptable
Nathaniel Garcia
Which is quite different from the notions of equality that are continually pushed by leftist/liberal groups and the media.
