Let's assume some sort of international banking cartel exists for a second, run by maybe four or five families at the very top, and that the entire world economy is a very orchestrated conspiracy. And that the coronavirus was manufactured, or that it is being capitalized on to justify implementing a quarantine, the purpose of which is only partially to prevent the spread of the disease--the real purpose being some kind of social experiment or social attack on common people.
I think if this quarantine is really part of some international cartel's grander plans, they are seeing A) how we generally react to major isolation from one another and/or B) they are trying to permanently neuter the population by: decreasing hope and the will to fight through bombarding the population with negative messages regarding the state of the world during a very vulnerable societal state; creating an economic meltdown that serves to absolutely destroy morale; and decreasing social connectivity and increasing submissive introversion, reinforced by both of the former, by destroying social fabric that could ostensibly never be repaired after a lengthy or periodic quarantine and a subsequent cultural change toward not being as social in general. The idea being that society loses all remaining gusto and becomes more easily controlled.
Can anyone possibly surmise what the point of this quarantine is, if it is simply a quarantine or what the ulterior motives are from the perspective of the cartel could be in the long run?
>Let's assume some sort of international banking cartel exists for a second Stopped reading right there. Just another example of the hyper-concperitorial mind oof foolish americans.
Adam Perez
It's just an unviable idea, there are too many people to control. Look at Michigan right now
Jordan Morris
Mandatory Vaccination and Digital ID for everyone is the endgoal
Leo Evans
Damn looks like government run English classes don't really work. Conspiratorial. We all have auto correct fucking tranny
Catherine Austin Fitts (former Wall Street insider and government employee) would agree with you.. she made a claim two years ago that there was a push even then to do so and that it might be an attempt to be able to effectively turn people into collateral.
Austin Sanchez
Personally- i don't see an adequate long-term planned move that would necessitate doing this. They thrive on being unknown, with everything in the real-world being status quo while they do what they do; just lording over a complacent and basically unconscious flock.
This is far more likely to be a 'project bluebeam' style move - a last resort - like something is getting out of control and they need to destabilize and then recreate order again - this is more likely than some attempt of furtherance of a proverbial 'new world order' where they want to put people in fema camps or some shit.
If you want to make the argument that there is a cartel of this nature comprised of people, then its important to consider that they can be overthrown, also. Since we're acknowledging that they own just about everything, or at least all the big stuff - its interesting to see all of "their" stuff shut down, with the exception of course of absolute essentials, like grocery stores. Just like pieces on a chessboard, right now a lot of the heavy hitters are out of the game at the moment; one of the biggest remaining would be the media propaganda machine.
Personally - if its not just a worldly overreaction to a simple virus, or the virus isn't way worse than we're being told - the next most likely scenario is that they are being dethroned
Parker Robinson
Majority of the planet has been controlled by a minority of people literally all through history - you see it happen right in front of your face every day. Of course there's going to be protests, random chaos, dissidents along the way - just instances of entropy; nature breaking down man's attempt to control things.
Its worth noting that the control isn't all 100% nefarious - part of maintaining order means appeasing people - having stocked grocery stores and the ability to have anything you desire shipped to your doorstep is a couple of many examples of the fruits of their system - but their means are really ugly, and there are lots of rotten apples in the bunch
John Stewart
Yeah, a strong imperial system essentially means that the citizens never have to worry about supply side, which allows for obvious benefits. The concentration of financial resources can be directed toward technological, scientific advancements that would likely impossible otherwise. But it also means that they have you by the balls and can do whatever they want, and if the endgame was going to suck for everyone, if there was a point that they had such a high level of control that they wouldn't even have to bother with appeasement, I certainly wouldn't want it, and I definitely wouldn't want to wait to find out.
Hudson Rodriguez
>or what the ulterior motives are from the perspective of the cartel could be in the long run they want to introduce a new global currency, even better tracking utilities (for your safety, of course) and make people fear liberty.
