You always see firemen at burning buildings, but that doesn't mean they cause the fire.
Rephrase this saying a little and replace "firemen" with "White men" and "buildings" with "countries". Suddenly it all makes sense, you can see right through it. (((Their))) narrative. The entire idea of "White privilege" destroys itself with this simple sentence. We can even turn this into an effective investigative method for historical/political events&organizations. I think it is an excellent way to slowly redpill normies by guiding them to the truth without name-dropping.
>Whitey wipes out Native Americans with diseases such as the Black Death >Whitey colonizes America Yes, but (((who))) is responsible for the Black Death? >Whitey colonizes Islamic countries Yes, but the Islamic countries were attacking for centuries. And who had large influence and autonomy in the Islamic world? (((Who)) were the Dönme? >Whitey colonizes Africa Yes, but (((who))) perpetrated the Atlantic slave trade? >Whitey colonizes India Yes, because they had to directly take the resources since the Ottoman Empire blocked them from the Silk Road. And (((who))) controlled the Silk Road, I wonder? (((Who))) were the "Dönme" again? And have you heard of the lovely (((Sassoon family)))? >Whitey fights the Opium Wars >Whitey colonizes China Yes, what about Sassoon? >Whitey colonizes Australia Yes, but (((who))) are the Gandel family? And why did they fund Indigenous students? And William Cooper? Why did his protests against the Kristallnacht lead to the Abolish Australia Day movement?
Do you notice a certain pattern across the entirety of history? Do you notice that countries were colonized after a certain pattern, action and reaction? And how the very few countries that have been spared by the pattern were never colonized? Do you notice how this (((pattern))) influences politics to this day, with refined methods of subversion?
Europe is the fireman of history. And now we know the (((arsonist))).
I don't think you know what "political theory" means
Hunter Ward
oh no its retarded
Lucas Hernandez
Russia isn't Europe.
Grayson Ortiz
That is an irrelevant detail for this topic. Don't even try to turn this into a sort of country-bashing context as on Yas Forums. We know that your flag likes to do that, but resist your natural tendency for once.
What the author of the map meant was that Siberia is a part of the Russian Empire mostly settled by ethnic Russians.
And that brings us back on topic. You know why the Russians HAD to expand East, East ever-East? Well, they were often harassed by Turkic and Mongolian steppe tribes, equestrian nomads (this may remind you of the Shoshone tribe and their constant raiding of US territory). It was in general pretty similar to the American drive West, and it involved frontiersmen from all over Europe; Russians, Germans, Swedes, Polish, Ukrainians, Serbs, Vlachs etc. One of the most gruelsome of these tribes were the Jewish Khazars, who were crushed by Sviatoslav the Great.
Didn't read all that shit but just look at the state of each of those places before and after whitey.
Joseph Brown
I do know what that is, a supposition of ideas intended to explain some political issue. And btw, you are not welcome, Kalergi flag. You are part of the problem. Oh no! You deliver absolutely no substantion for your claims. Go post in "made-for-BBC", "have-sex" and other Yas Forums-tier threads if you don't like this one. We've all had the laugh, troll, now move on.
>Didn't read all that shit It's virtually guaranteed you are phonefag who doesn't care about elaboration and focuses most of his energy on replying to twitter-posts and bait. Giving an honest effort-post a try is owrth more than even one letter of a shite thread. >just look at the state of each of those places before and after whitey. Yes, we can do that. But then again, we would not need this forum, you got wikis for that. The goal is to elaborate the reason WHY something happened, not to state that something is as it is. Imagine if all knowledge-seeking was done like that. It would be nice if you contributed to making more retard-proof arguments rather than supporting the opposite.
Good history lesson but nothing we don't already know. You aren't going to trick people with reworded phrases. They're brainwashed. Logic doesn't apply. Normies follow pathos. Many easier ways to show them the jew run media is bad. Foremost is to seed doubt that the media is honest.
Also, stop responding to shills if you want a serious discussion. 90% of them are bots or trolling. You're better than them.
>just posting pic related is how easy it is to make them seethe
First, I did not create the infograph, second, Kalergi married Jewish women and third, in his book, "Praktischer Idealismus" did an elaborate characterization of Jews and why he believes them to be "the new aristocracy for Europe", after they saw combat in and survived both world wars.
>You always see white men at countries, but that doesn't mean they cause the fire. idgi
Caleb Carter
Ethiopia was never colonized. It was only briefly occupied by Italy and it lasted less than a few years. So no deep influence there.
Christopher Perez
>Good history lesson but nothing we don't already know. You are right. Perhaps I should press this point more cleary: For the entire colonial narrative that the radical left has pushed in academic discourse to be dismantled, it is necessary to name the push and pull factors leading to White European dominance. We may become desensitized to constant redpills through digging into many a rabbithole, but sometimes it is necessary to return to more basic truths and exemplify them. The real weight of this argument is the fact that history would not have taken ist path without Jewish conflict-sparking. The real deal is to not mistake the fireman for the aronist, which is, especially for someone who still inhabits Plato's cave, quite difficult.
I thought it would be refreshing to condense what we already know into a simple parabel. Whitey = fireman, Shlomo = arsonist. The power lies not in the information, but the way of the narrative. I just wanted to stirr discussion on this cold board. >You aren't going to trick people with reworded phrases. They're brainwashed. Logic doesn't apply. Normies follow pathos. Many easier ways to show them the jew run media is bad. I do recognize that fact, but it was more important to push a point than to name the natural exceptions to my rule, which, I am glad, you discovered on your own. >Foremost is to seed doubt that the media is honest. That is part of what I intended to achieve. You dumb this down to a parabel, to demonstrate an association fallacy. The thing that normies (or even delusional radicals that may be recruited, I would rather we focus on them) have hard-wired into their brain, what we call "White guilt", aside from the psychological aspects of it, can be described as an association fallacy. The same thing is what we see with radical leftists, they associate "fire" with "the bourgeoisie", or in the more novel utterance of doctrine, "Whiteness" and "toxic masculinity". We did NOT start the fire. We are firemen.
Landon Morris
>Also, stop responding to shills if you want a serious discussion. I just needed the bumps. I will now resort to more serious adresses. Thanks for your contribution. >You always see white men at burning countries, but that doesn't mean they cause the fire. FTFY A little more readng comprehension.
Hudson Martinez
And yet somehow, Ethiopia remains one of the poorest and crime ridden countries in Africa. Bizarre. Almost like colonization isn't the reason you live like that. Meanwhile in South Africa before apartheid ended
>but sometimes it is necessary to return to more basic truths and exemplify them I agree. Just showing a nigger neighborhood is 10x more effective than explaining FST distance and the intricacies of IQ studies. keep it simple stupid goes a long way.
Idk about the Jews and colonization. I'm sure there's a kike in the oven here, but blaming colonialism on jews is inadvertently admitting it was wrong. Africa was an uncivilized shithole. Still is. Did you expect the white man to just sit on his ass and not explore the world?
Leftists academics don't debate or listen to reason. They bully their way into our institutions, brainwash, and make victim complexes to justify their behavior. Wish we could solve this with debate, but history never plays out that way. They hold the cards right now to set the narrative. I've tried for years debating every leftist that comes on this board. They don't admit defeat, they come back again and pretend they never heard you, just like the Jews in MK.
You got it. Jews leech off of our wealth through the banking system, universities, media and taxes, while they import more Oriental, African and Latino criminals so they can distract from their own undoing while at the same time perpetuating their inferiority complex by asserting the benefits of self-portrayed victimhood. We are told to stand by as the flames consume our home. If you ask any sane person, such inaction is not what the fire department would advise.
Tolerance and apathy are the virtues of a dying society.
>Idk about the Jews and colonization. I'm sure there's a kike in the oven here, but blaming colonialism on jews is inadvertently admitting it was wrong. That is also part of my theory. I do not entirely blame colonialism on Jews, it was often also an honest or practical European effort to spread civilization. But the truth is more nuanced, and of course consistent, and that is what I point towards. We are just like firemen, we do something good by saving and recovering what others burned down through incompetence or malice.
But firemen would be unemployed in a world without hazards, no? Jews are among those hazards. Throughout history they wanted to co-opt as many nations as possible so as to get their land and their "messiah". And now that they have it they want to build their temple and consolidate their influence.
Jews often like to point out how much they did for science, though that is arguable, we can also point out their flaws, which are numerous. And those affect, not only Whites, but every race that they currently dislike. After we're gone it's the Asians, then the Arabs, then the Latinos and finally negros. >Did you expect the white man to just sit on his ass and not explore the world? No, but there was already peaceful trade of Europe with Africa since the Iron Age. We know that because we can find Ethiopian kettles in Iron Age Scandinavian sediment layers. But then pic related came, and the trade grew violent. >Leftists academics don't debate or listen to reason. They bully their way into our institutions, brainwash, and make victim complexes to justify their behavior. Wish we could solve this with debate, but history never plays out that way. They hold the cards right now to set the narrative.I've tried for years debating every leftist that comes on this board. They don't admit defeat, they come back again and pretend they never heard you, just like the Jews in MK. I know, I know.
Your text talks about whiteness, but your map only shows Europe.
Of the handful of orange countries: - Japan: US occupation. - North Korea: Significant commie (European) influence. - Liberia: US colony.
>Yes, but (((who))) is responsible for the Black Death? It was a disease, retard, not a Jewish plot.
>Yes, but (((who))) perpetrated the Atlantic slave trade?
US (Deist elite, Christian majority), Brazil (Christian), Portugal (Christian), Spain (Christian), the UK (Christian), France (Christian, significant atheist elite later on) a bunch of African tribes whose details my Eurocentric education has elided. In the US one of the Christian sects even FOUGHT A WAR to try to resurrect the Atlantic slave trade (and ensure a ready supply of kids for the leaders).
Eh, if Finland counts as Europe so does the Russian Federation and Turkey.
Nathan Diaz
>Your text talks about whiteness, but your map only shows Europe. Are you a bit stupid, Pekka? Modern Europeans only entered America en masse after Columbus, i.e. they colonized it. >- Japan: US occupation. The definition of a colony is a country or area under full political control AND occupied by settlers. That was not the case with Japan. >- North Korea: Significant commie (European) influence. You are indeed stupid, Pekka. First, Communism is Jewish shit, invented by Marx. Second, the DPRK renounced all association with Communism byy 2008, the official doctrine is Juchee, and it is not Marxist anymore. Then, only China exerts any significant trade relations with North Korea, not any White nation. >- Liberia: US colony. It was colonized with Blacks, for Blacks. >It was a disease, retard, not a Jewish plot. Most of our ancestors would disagree with that, Pekka. You don't commit a pogrom for absolutely no reason. >US (Deist elite, Christian majority), Brazil (Christian), Portugal (Christian), Spain (Christian), the UK (Christian), France (Christian, significant atheist elite later on) a bunch of African tribes whose details my Eurocentric education has elided. In the US one of the Christian sects even FOUGHT A WAR to try to resurrect the Atlantic slave trade (and ensure a ready supply of kids for the leaders). Oh silly you. Jews perpetrated the African slave trade, lurk moar.
Theories of racial hierarchy were very popular prior to the defeat of the Dozen Year Reich. What most people don't understand is that there were VERY MANY theories of racial hierarchy, not just Muh Germanic Master Race. The scientific establishment generally thought master races made sense, and the ones who were honest with themselves considered the possibility that THEY might not be the master race. Anti-semitism was ALSO very popular prior to the defeat of the Dozen Year Reich.
An upper-class hapa writing about a Jewish master race could be GUARANTEED a pile of (You)s, just like anyone posting from an Israeli proxy can get five times the attention their posts would merit on content alone.
Jaxson Martin
Note, most African slaves were brought to Brazil. And even the wiki admits that they had a significant role in there.
