There have been estimates that up to 40% of Italians had corona, but new testing shows it may just be 10%.
Not good. That’s just 50 times higher than the number of positively tested.
thetimes.co.uk
There have been estimates that up to 40% of Italians had corona, but new testing shows it may just be 10%.
Not good. That’s just 50 times higher than the number of positively tested.
thetimes.co.uk
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
www3.nhk.or.jp
twitter.com
Most people defeat it with innate immunity, not antibodies. It’s a pathetically weak virus.
Remember the 6 million goy
obviously you don't know what you're talking about
These antibody tests aren't a mature science.
That's hardly surprising being as it's mostly in northern italy where the case numbers are. This is what's so fucking dumb with policy by modelling and not region - we need to "flatten the curve" and yet they apply the curve to the entire nation rather than the regions where the outbreak takes place, so surely we're doing the dreaded "lock up too soon" in places barely touched?
You don’t have to produce antibodies to defeat the virus you dumb fucking ape. The majority of people don’t produce antibodies.
>pathetically weak virus
>largest killer in the US for weeks straight
>There have been estimates that up to 40% of Italians had corona, but new testing shows it may just be 10%.
>Not good. That’s just 50 times higher than the number of positively tested.
And tomorrow, you will talk about "aerosol transmission" again.
Daily reminder OP is part of the governments panic shills.
>Compare Corona to Spanish Flu
>Talk about permanent consequences of infection, even if there's no real proof yet
>Talk about how people will die at home or on the streets, unable to breathe, a horrible death for everyone
>R0 = massive, always say this, even if there's no proof yet
Sounds like Yas Forums for the last few weeks, doesn't it?
Well, it's actually from a work by the German government/think tanks, which is mainly about how to make home quarantines and curfews more palatable to the populace. Make them afraid, that is the trick, and they will accept everything.
Quite a weird coincidence that Yas Forums has used absolutely the same arguments and talking points until recently, isn't it? And even more amazing that the same arguments and talking points weren't just used on Yas Forums, but also on all other chans, on reddit and on mainstream media news.
What a coincidence, right?
Fake meme bots.
Fake virus.
The more Italians are infected, the better. It means the mortality rate is low.
GUYS I GOT WORD COVID ATTACHES TO YOUR BRAINSTEM AND EVERY 20 DAYS MAKES YOU STAB YOURSELF IN THE GALLBLADDER
Why six and not five or seven?
so what? you need only one to extract antibodies from and make a vaccine
Confirmed cases in Italy represent less than 0.3% of the population. And now we find only 10% of the population have antibodies (NB antibodies does not necessarily mean immunity).
Look at the devastation associated with less than 0.3% of the population being diagnosed with coronavirus infection and 10% of the population developing antibodies.
This will go on for years before herd immunity can be hoped for.
Stay away from other humans and hope to find an effective vaccine that does not make the disease worse (a feline coronavirus vaccine made the feline coronavirus disease worse).
Maybe there is no herd immunity. Maybe all we can do is social distancing and mask wearing.
Maybe
And it will be for a long time yet.
>muh antibodies
Having antibodies doesn't means you defeated the virus. Having antibodies only proves one thing and one thing only, that you are/were infected.
God you mongrels never ever cease to amaze with your double digit IQs.
Because muh 6 gorillion, obviously
Only because it's diagnosed on people who would have died anyway
Bullshit's behind a wall so lemme ask:
10% of ALL Italians, or 10% of INFECTED Italaians
Would you miss Italy much? Were you very close?
Just asking for a friend.
Cali had a 1.4-4% anti-body test and they were saying the number of cali's that were reported were 50-80 times less than the actual number that had it user, I dont think you understand the % here or how anti-bodies work.
You idiot
We are all going to die sometime
Just because someone is old does not mean they are not valuable.
Premature death should be avoided.
Besides young people are also dying of this virus.
When was the last time you read a newspaper?
That's because a large portion of americans have pathetically weak immune systems.
10% of all Italians based on randomized testing
With a sample size of?
Muuuuh estimates, muuuuh it may be muuuuh
>I dont think you understand the % here or how anti-bodies work.
What’s your criticism? The 10% or the 6 million?
>Having antibodies doesn't means you defeated the virus.
Thanks for kicking off this thread, Deutschland.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
They didn’t release the study yet. The Italian health institute chief said it’s 10%.
When was the last time you compared the statistics to flu? Media and government hysteria are not arguments.
Until they release the sample size, that means literally fuck all
>Having antibodies doesn't means you defeated the virus
Often when that's done they will take the absolute worst of the flu (which itself is pretty fucking bad when it's bad), and then say "look it's only 2 or 3 times higher!", while also doing this while one is still ongoing while the other has ended.
I think what Italians did is tested 50,000 donated blood plasmas from across Italy to calibrate the antibody tests. And the results were about 10%.
>that you are/were infected.
>***are***
>slav(e) intellectuals
An unfortunately limited report.
We need sample size and method information ASAP