What is this board's thoughts on ancaps?

based

Attached: C8_O7zoXsAInfwu.jpg (852x1024, 69.86K)

a nuclear armed society is a society

Attached: 1584953273571.jpg (800x800, 61.18K)

They're just larping, they're not true libertarians. How many of them do you think actually have read libertarian theory?

someone needs to tell these faggot leftist "comedians" that you're supposed to make the audience laugh not lecture them with your insufferable ideology

Anyone who thinks they need a ruler is the ultimate cuck

The end game of ancap is the same as any other system: a massive overpowering government.
>make a bunch of money
>payoff media to create sentiment that we need a large government with lots of power
>buy off government
It's really not that complicated

Attached: 1574809679455.gif (220x220, 9K)

Lol imagine being non-white and having to come up with this nonsense to justify your race’s propensity for living in squalor.

>turkey is white
>but Greece and Italy is not

buthurt Armenian detected

Except consumer choice and competition. Kys

>libertarian theory
>implying you need a theory to realize that liberty and property rights are the only things that will save humanity

Yes because we clearly see level headed objective thoughtful responses to even our media.

I'd like to see someone overpower me with my recreational nuke sitting in my driveway.

Rothbard explained that the use of nuclear weapons are ipso facto violations of the non-aggression principle because of their indiscriminate nature. Thanks for proving once again that ancaps on this board are just larpers.

>It has often been maintained, and especially by conservatives, that the development of the horrendous modern weapons of mass murder (nuclear weapons, rockets, germ warfare, etc.) is only a difference of degree rather than kind from the simpler weapons of an earlier era. Of course, one answer to this is that when the degree is the number of human lives, the difference is a very big one.4 But another answer that the libertarian is particularly equipped to give is that while the bow and arrow and even the rifle can be pinpointed, if the will be there, against actual criminals, modern nuclear weapons cannot. Here is a crucial difference in kind. Of course, the bow and arrow could be used for aggressive purposes, but it could also be pinpointed to use only against aggressors. Nuclear weapons, even "conventional" aerial bombs, cannot be. These weapons are ipso facto engines of indiscriminate mass destruction. (The only exception would be the extremely rare case where a mass of people who were all criminals inhabited a vast geographical area.) We must, therefore, conclude that the use of nuclear or similar weapons, or the threat thereof, is a sin and a crime against humanity for which there can be no justification.

mises.org/library/war-peace-and-state

Didn't save america tho

Funny you mentioned media. CNN, Fox, MSNBC, ABC... so very thoughtful of our "republic." Dont you think? A government keen on preventing people from going to beaches and going outside surely has the Bill of Rights in close proximity.
Maybe you like self quarantine, I prefer social distancing. Should work wonders on society if you in particular stay indoors. You'd do a great justice.

They're a fucking joke.

Getting a reasonable number of people in an area to agree on policy without any governance, steering, or oversight seems like an impossible task. Any private security or mercenary apparatus a stable ancap society builds to deal with subverters and attackers will almost certainly resemble a state even if it's not formalized as one, and there's nothing really stopping a gang from taking over and effectively becoming the state.
You might say since there's no taxation, they can't support themselves without theft. So what? They don't need to formalize theft in some constitution. They'd just use force to steal. They'd write a simple set of rules for the powerless to follow.
You might say since there's no state, you can kill thieves or hire mercenaries to deal with rogue, immoral groups. That's true but there's no guarantee of success and no guarantee they won't come after you.
Bottom line is that your good guys have to be stronger than their bad guys, indefinitely.

I don't intend to defend statism by saying this, I just don't think there's an easy answer that effectively and neatly deals with concerns of power.

Retards, want ancap? go live with amish ppl.

Learn what ancaps actually believe first you tard

Ancap memes and nothing else

>ancaps
perverted junkies

muh roads

Attached: nappity.png (2000x1333, 172.17K)

Is this all you do, just “leafpost”. It doesn’t get boring?

>Except consumer choice and competition

Attached: image.png (1291x957, 2.02M)

I considered myself an ancap for awhile, but really I was just coming to realize that I want anarchism as a tool for change, not the system in itself. The ideal "government" is a state of small enough size that the populace itself is essentially the government, see Grecian city-states. Balkanized America is the best possible outcome. Anarcho-capitalism should be considered a step in the change, not the goal.