Guess what kind of comments you would find under this
Other urls found in this thread:
latimes.com
twitter.com
a bunch of whining liberal faggots saying dis is problematic with onions beard selfie avatars
i retweeted because I want to punch the shit out of white people.
are they really going to push pedo acceptance? i'd draw the line at that point. i even tolerated trannies but 100% not this shit. sick fuckers should be shot.
bro you just posted virtue signaling cringe
i retweeted because i want to punch the shit out of muslim people.
There are. You do know they are using the word M.A.P. (Minor Attracted People) instead of pedo and start saying shit such as "LOok, i'm a pedo, I won't harm children but I will still jerk it to child porn".
HELL, the dude who made that tweet made a comment saying he's ok with pedophiles who won't hurt children... THAT'S LITERALLY PEDO ACCEPTANCE.
That's how it started with gays goddamn it. "What do you care what they do in their bedroom bigot!" and now you have to bake cakes for them.
Is it ok to masturbate to girls in their 20s if they express neoteny features?
Haha nice comment
based and retweetpilled
that entire thread is just dipshits with pedo anime avatars and "uwu" handles circlejerking each other
neck yourself you fucking retard this isn't politics
This is just as stupid as the "punch a nazi" bullshit. Bragging about hurting people online is just a beta move in general, regardless of who it is or if they deserve it.
I'm pretty sure the acceptance of pedophilia and its connection to LGBT has a lot to do with politics, and the topic certainly belongs in politically incorrect since hating LGBT and the pedo acceptance they are pushing is part of POL.
But stay mad I made your thread about "why coffee is good for you" disappear.
I find this extremely offensive.
Pedo.
scat fetishists, poop jokes and also pedophile apologism.
lolis are hot though, at least when they're 2D
Better keep it there cheif
>your thread about "why coffee is good for you"
wat
You find grotesque noses beyond the shadows
Based
age of consent is a feminist idealogy to take away power from men
>girls in their 20s who look like teenagers
wait, is this a thing? is it common?
i just get tired of the knee jerk "muh 18" when there's actual children being abused
Nothing worse than uncommon acronyms presented as if they aren't.
maps get the fucking rope
It was actually started in the US by a bunch of hyper religious feminazis who made the laws to (supposedly) guard against homophobia. Age of consent laws to prevent sex with prepubescent minors with real actual pedophiles actually make sense. Age of consent laws post pubescent make absolutely zero sense. The only exceptions with age of consent post pubescent should be for those in positions of authority over minors. Like principals, teachers, doctors and minor patients, so on, that sorta thing. This idea that a post pubescent 13 or 14 or 15 year old girl (or even 16 and 17 in some states) should never be allowed to be in a relationship with an adult man is really getting ridiculous and reaching clown levels with how they keep trying to tack onto it all the time.
This. The girl should eligible for marriage one year after first menarche. Whatever the age. She can be courted (without sex) in that first year.
All faggots are pedophiles.