How does Eric Striker manage to lose every debate he's ever in?
How does Eric Striker manage to lose every debate he's ever in?
Other urls found in this thread:
are you one of the antifa faggots he and mike BTFO'd the other day?
No, I was actually searching out debates of far right people. I just noticed that he always come across as a total retard who doesn't know how to structure an argument
He sucks at debate. His debate against Destiny on the Killstream was cringe. Haven't watched it yet, but may check out his and Mike's recent debate. Maybe he does better with Mike babysitting him.
>Maybe he does better with Mike babysitting him.
he definitely did. Strikers intro was like he was trying to emulate hitler at a beerhall and mikes was calm and collected. The guys they were debating were fucking retards though especially one guy who kept just saying "this is a waste of my time" over and over again.
Overall I think neither of them are really fascist or third positionist though, enoch just wants white rights and striker is basically just your racist uncle who works at an automotive plant. Theres no real substantive theory.
Destiny trannies and nerds like op are grasping at straws. Striker generally dominates in debates, but he gets frustrated with drooling spergs obsessed with semantics. I dont blame him, debating people who dont have sincere beliefs like destiny or sargon is a waste of time.
He's just not very good at arguing. There's no shame in it, he is good at writing, good at collating ideas and putting them across to others, good at conversing which makes for good listening, he just doesn't argue well. Maybe he's too honest for it.
Take Destiny, he's good at arguing, but everything else he does is boring af, he's extremely dishonest and a literal cuck.
I could have a drink with Striker but i'd glass destiny.
was it on strike and mike or killstream?
built
for
BBC
Im sorry but dare i say it and i mean literally LITERALLY FUCKING WHO?
I would love to see him debate someone genuine in their beliefs.
name one
Striker is much too idealistic and will argue dumb shit, like when he wasted time debating the whole jazz/classical/music thing with Destiny. Mike is much more no-nonsense and will focus on debating things that are most important to today's political situation, which is why I like him much more as a debater. He's obviously very intelligent and knowledgeable about politics, history, etc. but is able to boil down his ideas to very simple grug brained talking points that are effective.
>it was cringe, but I haven't watched it yet
>that pic of mike
Whoever okayed that should be shot.
Mike Enoch was the best thing to arise out of the whole Alt-Right shitshow. Guy should drop edgy memes and model himself on Jared Taylor but actually name the Jew.
Like a toddler?
well considering the last two retards he debated literally dont believe that being white is a real thing and that gender is fake...its not like hes debating people with actual beliefs
He absolutely didn't lose to Destiny, all Destiny does is pilpul while Striker tried to make intuitive arguments instead of credentialism
how are nazis supposed to have research to back their assertions of Jews control all the institutions
Striker didn't lose to Destiny ,bc Destiny never debated him. He just kept switching topics and avoiding any conversation
The people who claim Striker lost to Destiny were not paying attention. The whole argument was Striker desperately trying to pivot back to arguing ideas, and Destiny trying to drag him away from politics.
Some people claim Striker blew the classical music debate, but listen to it again. Destiny countered Striker's point that jazz was a simplified waltz by bringing up John Coltraine. Striker then said jazz was incoherent and atonal crap, which Coltraine absolutely is.
The response was an "ACHKSHUALLY" that not all jazz is like that, which is technically true. But who gives a shit?
Strikers broader point was that American music comes from Europe, and Destiny refused to counter it. It was just faggoty nitpicking.
enoch is a big brain pretending to be a goon, with disastrous results
striker is an actual goon
Mike definitely came off as reasonable
Has he lost though?
Practice is how they get better. Everyone overly critical thinks theyd be an expert debater in their own heads
The fucker who says this is a waste of time is also the one who says "anti-semites" are not going to debate.
He's actually intellectual dishonest.
why does it matter to you?
I hope you don't believe that joker Tiny won against Striker.
Tiny was barely maintaining his composure, he just talks fast and to be honest, nobody gets anything from it, it's just a way to defend himself.
God imagine being such a lonely ausfag that you look up to highly insignificant seppo podcasters as if they are influential or innovative thinkers, even though they are long past their prime, during which their claim to fame was regurgitating Yas Forums memes and managing to become extremely minor subfootnotes in the history of the 2016 American election.
You are totally alone in your country, caring about these feds and kikes in America. These guys aren't intellectuals for fuck's sake mate. Go barbecue something
They are though, they have a vision and a future they believe in.
None of the guys they were debating have anything come close.
Tiny? Let's just continue to be neoliberal.
That anarchist hippie? Let's break big rock into thousand small pieces and those small pieces must constantly watch other back, it will work, trust me.
That coomie? Violence is bad, we need to vote ourselves out of this.
None of them have any slight idea of what they are doing.