If you take away all government control, then something is going to happen, but it cannot be both.
How can both of these ideologies exist?
Other urls found in this thread:
anarkiddy
how do you institute communism without force?
Religion
kumbaya everyone becomes class-conscious over night lets all hold hands shit
how do you guaranty property rights without a state?
With exceptions like Ellul and today Zizek most theorists were actively hostile to it.
Neither can happen because there will always be at least one person with enough strength and charisma to get people to accept him as their warlord.
I suppose the question is, when you take away the state, would people more naturally agree to the right of private property, or the right to share everything as public?
I'm not an-cap, but know that I think about it, I think the former seems a lot more "natural", most of us probably have an innate sense that we can own things that no one else has a right to
The only rights that exist are the ones you are willing to enforce yourself.