Did critical theory subvert communism?
Most of the ills of the left seems to have come from the critical theorists and the schools of thought which have branched off from them. It seems to explicitly be an ideology of the bourgeoisie which champions transgression for transgressions sake, transforming every individual to a psuedo-revolituonary. Mirroring what Kaczynski spoke about in his manifesto. It seems to be a way for the ruling class to neutralize challenges to them in academia by injecting a kind of revolutionary schizophrenia which balkanizes groups into mutually contradictory individuals.
Anyway, I bring this up to ask /lit/ if there are any books discussing how critical theory seems to have destroyed the workers movement, as well as communism.
Critical Theory
Critical theory is an example of internally-focused de-constructionism. Some genius (i will only name the genius once this thread hits 300) decided to turn critical theory inward towards the very roots of German Idealism itself. I have since followed this man's lead, completed the system of German Idealism by finding the ideal critiques to pic related, and then applying those critiques to every work derivative of such. I have in my schizo little head a winnowing fork to tease truth out of the dialectic model. Where Jacob and Esau may fight, I may choose the winner by means of applying, or not, internally-focused de-constructionism.
What?
There are so many search terms in my post.
Put the pieces together.
Do the work you lazy nigger.
>Critical theory is the reflective assessment and critique of society and culture by applying knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities to reveal and challenge power structures. It argues that social problems are influenced and created more by societal structures and cultural assumptions than by individual and psychological factors.
No. Critical theory dictates that communism is a flawed system which will subvert itself
Stay stronk balkanbro
critical theory:
>whatevers bad for whites
>mainly driven by jews
almost like an ethnic war posing as an idelogical war
will you tell me who if i say please?
This. and the subversion can be systemically directed.
critical theory is the science of being mad
>Where Jacob and Esau may fight, I may choose the winner by means of applying, or not, internally-focused de-constructionism.
That is subjective.
>i will only name the genius once this thread hits 300
so... never?
>Anyway, I bring this up to ask /lit/
>/lit/
Wrong board
We have to have a an intellectually stimulating thread which reaches 300 posts. I will follow it if jannies move.
These are my conditions.
Yes. M__M__ _MA ____ CSU____ [300]
Of course thats elementary, but only with effective design.
No, critical theory is essentially rebranded self-targeting Socratic questioning. The failure of the left is that they don't actually do it.
That which completes the system of German idealism is the key to designing effective subversion of all systems derivative of German idealism.
I can defuse communistic thinking.
Have you noticed any Commie threads on this board?
>>Did critical theory subvert communism?
Yes.
counter-currents.com
larouchepub.com
>Have you noticed any Commie threads on this board?
Every day.
Most of the idiots who think critical theory is some Jewish subversion tactic have no idea what they're talking about. Most of you fags would agree with the criticisms Adorno made about post-enlightenment society.
Foucault, who most of you hate, wasn't part of the Frankfurt school.
Most of what you hate comes from bad interpretations and applications of Derrida by American writers.
NOBODY that posts in this thread except for me and mybe one other person has read a single critical theory text.
>the key to designing effective subversion of all systems
Yes but the ontology is to design optimized systems
Yes.
They are immediately shitposted to death. Subversion of communism by means of critical theory is the artful form of anonymous shitposting. As a result, shitposting will save this republic.
>A good thread
>In Yas Forums
You seem to be lost
Im a cultural marxists. So is everyone else here.
Where the ontology constrains us we can pull our our massive critical theory schlong and slap it around and declare the requirements of our system to be whatever we goddamn well please.
>has read a single critical theory text.
Ya, we have real shit to think about.
What are *your* personal criticisms of postmodernism and critical theory?
cultural marx is an idiot meme for people who don't read
Would a robot's brain be smooth?
also pierre bourdieu is based, somebody fight me
Tinfoil tier conspiracy thread. Take your meds, schizo.
Explain how
>French
>intellectual
Choose one and only one.
I have. Poli sci major. Also good to know your enemies.
critical theory was designed to topple western civilization by attacking its foundation
this is generally marketed to women and minorities by scapegoating their problems onto white christian men and trying to slip all the "we have to destroy western civilization" shit straight into their subconscious
Explain
Copy and pasted my post from /lit/
oh noooo he's from frog land what am i going to DO
They mostly just apply it to what they don't like.
>You are all wrong, I know it because I am smart
>Not going to explain how, though
Smells like a pretentious normie.
take meds
I actually like Adorno, retard. I simply disagree with the Authoritarian Personality. No one can read that book without coming to the conclusion that it's pure Jewish subversion.
Also, Marcuse championed the sexual revolution. Why do you commies mix the legitimate with the indefensible so much?
>critical theory
>=
>upper middle class useful idiots kvetching about themselves
My PhD program is full of these midwits. They get really uncomfortable about being called on their actual privilege.
PhD students get the rope too
The poster is one of a million examples of the kind of slime that oozes out of academia. They are slippery like eels, using their verbal skill to baffle, distract, evade, etc.
All criticism, no constructivity. In their minds they can never be wrong.
It's kind of like pilpul.
>a philosophical approach to culture, and especially to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it
In essence, critical theory is the driving element of the 'Player Hater's ball'
Folks, comedy is the only intellectual pursuit still allowed on TV and there are numerous messages within if you are tuned to the signal. David Chappelle is very knowledgable about critical theory given the pedigree of his parents.
>They mostly just apply it to what they don't like.
They hate out loud.
youtube.com
>Real hating is like an artform
>you like a born hater
>I hate on a nigga til he's totally broke and ain't got nothin like me.
Ultimately. All you have to do is convince the target to hate their own ideology. The phenomenon of psyche mirroring will eventually persuade them spiritually, even if you do not persuade them logically.
Click your heels three times and go back to Africa.
It's a good meme to alienate normies from Marxist bullshit.
Critical theory is bad because it views people as radical individuals, rather than part of an extended whole, complete with its own hierarchy. It's fundamentally a rejection of hierarchy. Hierarchy is a key tenant of fascism.
You're confusing the tool with applications of the tool... Critical theory works GREAT on fascists.
Butthurt commie who's upset that Jews ruined communism for the masses. Frankfurt school writers were literally banned from the Soviet Union, lol.
If we don't produce doctorates we won't be able to compete against China.
I am not on a level to critique Critical Theory, however, is it not true that ultimate free choice is truly subjective and free of objective influence. If there is an objective reason to choose, then it is not a choice made freely by the self. How was anything subverted?