"Overreacting is better than under-reacting". What is this fallacy called?

Sunk Cost Fallacy?

> female behavior
Ah yes. There it is. Thanks.

How about fuck yourself, nigger. Let's nuke the world the next time someone gets the cold

OP's fallacy.

Attached: 1563746986273.jpg (1440x1440, 91.87K)

There is a bit of sunk cost in this.

>What is this fallacy called
When it's about health and life safety - common sense
Safety rules are written using this axiom.

Depends whether someone is empathetic or apathetic.

>normalfag tier
Apathetic and overreacting

>autism tier
Apathetic and underreacting

>schizo tier
Empathetic and overreacting

>alpha tier
Empathetic and underreacting

>10s of thousands possibly 100s
This will be the number dead from suicide. An entire generation will lose its rights and opportunities. So no, it isn't. You have an opinion, no one knows for a fact. What we do know is male suicide will increase from unemployment and families will be destroyed as well. We know that for a fact because it has happened many times over.

It's not a fallacy as there is no logical structure, that's just a statement.
You can then determine if it's a false or true statement. Truth is, no statement can be evaluated devoid of context, which is what your low iq nigger ape brain is trying to do.
Depends on what's at risk, and to whom, since risk is tied to value, and value is subjective. which makes an universal statement such the the one we're talking about, impossible, gay, and retarded.

Attached: 1586230111280.jpg (600x402, 56.65K)

its called the globohomo loyaly test
All that believe are globohomo citizens

Absolutely nothing has changed. This "pandemic" is real for no one. It's become another political litmus test like anthropomorphic climate change. None of it is real and affects no one except those who willingly submit to it and prostrate themselves before to the farcical belief system. Locking themselves in their houses, not seeing their families. Globohomo adherents sit on their podiums and instruct their most sycophantic followers to become inquisitors and to go seek out the non-believers to chastise them. If you don't "believe" you will die. If you don't "believe" it is your fault other people die. Just like its the fault of some lower class nobody for destroying the planet because they don't adhere to the mother gaia death cult climate change lies and willingly sacrifice their material existence to it's priests and adherents.

The lines have been drawn, same as ever. These are not new enemies, they are they same old enemies. They want you dead and your children raped. If covid-19 was real and they could they would run around spraying you and your family with it.

Attached: daemonica1.gif (320x352, 837.36K)

Me on the left

> Risk-free world.
One of the things that I loved about the original Star Trek series was how Capt. Kirk and friends would encounter these civs that took a seemingly logical idea and pushed it to the extreme.

1. We don't need wars. Let's sanitize them and just run computer simulations. After each "battle" people will be killed by lottery.

2. Life is sacred and should be preserved at all costs: result is an overpopulated planet with no personal space or property.

3. Our great leader has died, let's replace him with a computer which dictates our lives. We'll be perfectly peaceful except during a 24 hour period called "festival".

4. etc.

I could go on ...

>NOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN ELDERINOS

Majoring on the minors.

Attached: 1561438534310.png (1100x1563, 151.72K)

The word “fallacy” is owned by liberals, like all words you use to communicate. Unless the use of a word benefits their cause, that word has no definition. And if an idea is contrary to their cause, the only appropriate words to define that idea are “racist”, “phobic”, or “denier”

So I guess you’re a reactophobe. Afraid of reacting to things, I see. That kind of Trump-loving nazi behavior will kill millions, you know...

It's essentially a form of Pascale's wager.

> Pascal's wager.
Thx.
I scarcely would've believed it possible for a fucking leaf to be of any use but here it is.

That isn't a fallacious argument. It is fact. "You can never be too prepared" or some derivative there of is what you are getting at.

>you will be cast in hell if you don't listen to me
No wonder prot nations have become atheistic.

Also depending on context the actual fallacy could be any of:

ad ignoratiam (you don’t know how bad it would have been if we had underreacted)
ad misericordium (you want millions to die)
falsum dilemma (the only options are shutting down everything or leaving everything exactly as it was with no moderate responses possible)

Fallacy of reification: Or treating an unreal event as if it were real. Misplaced concreteness. An example would be like being scared of your own shadow/chasing shadows.

"Everyone believe and put faith in something not proven to be real"- t every schizo on the face of the planet. Replace "corona virus" with "reptilians", "hydra", "timecube".

Attached: 1586798485029.jpg (1043x1043, 321.81K)

>better safe than sorry

Over reacting is better though. We barely know anything about this virus, we don't know if you if this virus stays in your system permanently like with HIV, we don't know if you can get reinfected, we don't know if you can get reinfected if the second exposure is worse like with dengue fever, and considering if we let it run loose it's almost certain majority of people will be exposed to this virus, we should at least know the severity of this before we open back up.

Attached: 1587058610262.jpg (504x551, 39.19K)

>break your leg
>get into a full body cast for two months
>better safe than sorry