Quantum computers are modern day ouija boards made for schizos. Prove me wrong

Quantum computers are modern day ouija boards made for schizos. Prove me wrong.
>throw random sets of data into it
>have them pass a filter because everything quantum is probabilistic in nature, effectively cherry picking results
>throw whatever is left into a model to try to make sense of the data
>this also has an error margin so you gotta pass it through yet another filter
>if by the end the result doesn't favor what you're looking for just do the same thing billions more times so the "wrong" data rounds up to zero
>at the end say the universe literally gave you this one answer specifically out of billions others so the universe is talking to you

Attached: WEB_eyevine9.14326736.jpg (630x480, 134.03K)

Other urls found in this thread:

phys.org/news/2019-09-team-holy-grail-room-temperature.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Quantum computers are modern day ouija boards made for schizos

based.

Das not how quantum works. You ask it to find something and it can do it faster because it can check all the possibilities at once

>, effectively cherry picking results
This is the whole point of quantum computing: you find a problem where it's not easy to answer, but it is easy to see if something is an answer or not. Then the quantum computer will probably give you an answer, and you can see if it actually is. You're "cherry picking" your answer the same way an exam marker is.

For an easy to understand and classic example, I tell you I have a number, and it's two prime numbers multiplied together, and your job is to tell me what those numbers are. Your job involves checking every single prime number that's less than half the number I gave you (or using a bunch of complicated mathematical theory to do less work), whereas my job is to take your two numbers, multiply them together, and see if my number comes out.
- Really difficult to answer
- Really easy to see if the answer is right or not

>the universe is talking to you
There's only one correct answer, so anything that was talking to you would have to say the same thing, so if it were the universe or weren't the universe the result would be the same, So you can't show that it's the universe.

Dumbass it uses quantum superposition and interference to pinpoint the correct answer out of all the possibilities.

the weird thing i read about Quantum computers is that they can basically access the multiverse... so if their tests are proven real then they pretty much admit that the multiverse is real and we somehow made a portal to them through these computers...

>Prove me wrong.
No. Just stay wrong and do it by yourself. That way you can't ruin shit for everyone else.

> it can check all the possibilities at once
This is a dangerous way to think about quantum computers: what you described is a hypothetical, more powerful computer called a "nondeterministic Turing machine". Quantum computers can only answer specific problems where the calculation is reversible, i.e. doesn't destroy any data. In theory it could be possible to prove you could make an ND Turing machine on a quantum computer, but in theory it could be possible to prove you could make an ND Turing machine on a newtonian computer.

So far no-one has done so.

If you had an ND Turing machine, this would let you do a whole bunch of seemingly-absurd stuff, like writing a simulation of the part of a human brain that appreciates music*, and then have the machine generate every possible song, and discard everything but the best song in the world.

> * b-but this needs to be solvable in polynomial time for the problem to be NP
Clearly it is because humans do it every time they listen to music. See the Protein Folding Problem.

Attached: f856b0362d00e918-600x338[1].jpg (600x338, 58.81K)

So, portuguese intellectuals do exist?

Ouija board talks to demons.
Quantum computer talks to demons.

Checks out.