How do I prove my feminist teacher wrong that straight white males also face challenges

How do I prove my feminist teacher wrong that straight white males also face challenges

Attached: FA0FE55F-64CE-4EE7-B6DC-F3C79F06D627.jpg (498x342, 32.75K)

Also sources would be nice

The feminist is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But call her childless and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Your teacher didn’t say white males never have problems in their lives. They just probably said something like white men generally have an advantage in society, and you got mad because you’re such a special snowflake and you have problems too gosh darn it!

Attached: 76AD9E3D-9EF1-4094-ADD3-4ADAD3E47546.jpg (540x721, 25.39K)

>Proove anything
>To a female
You don't. Her brain is incapable of breaking through her own delusions. The fact that she teaches sociology already screams out she's Dunning Kruger.

If you insist on arguing with programed retards: don't use ANY buzz words and don't use their language to describe anything. If you can't put your ideas in your own words than you should just keep your mouth shut.

You dont
She will never listen
Get the A, take a position of power later in life, and crush her like an ant

i don't think it's possible to uninstall feminism from a woman unless you're fucking (or she wants to fuck you)

the actual answer is that if identity is intersectional (or 'multidimensional' in non-cultspeak), then so is 'challenge', 'advantage' etc.

Read the S.C.U.M. Manifesto

If you have a Jewflix subscription there’s a documentary on Netflix called “The Red Pill”, it’s about a feminist who goes to men’s rights events around the county and realizes that they’re actually fucked, so she becomes one of them. Tons of good references in that one.