What’s the more redpilled choice? Owning a home in the suburbs, or owning a condo in the city?

Ranch in Wyoming.

Owning nothing is the ultimate.

It's sad to see that Ford and GM marketing from the 1950s still works on people

Cars are only "freedom" if you have the choice not to use them. If you live somewhere where nothing is within walking distance, where there's no infrastructure to cycle, where there's no public transit, etc. then you rely on a car the same way a polio patient relies on an iron lung.

Looks like a soviet block of socialist housing

this looks ugly as fuck. who the fuck wants to live in stone cave without any lights , aesthetics or coziness

>Victorian architecture is socialist
...

I have riverfront property with a little forest on it, so I could theoretically live completely off of my land and never go anywhere. But the jew says I need to pay taxes, so I have a job which requires a car to get to it.
I rely on the car because the kikes made it illegal to not partake in their economy.

I live on the 31st floor of an apartment in a somewhat large city and it’s pretty based. Women get soaking wet when they look out the window the first time

>which is better,
>owning a building or owning part of a building?

redpilled

Neither. Cabin in the woods.
>Inb4 but I want my city job so I can buy take out and gadgets I don't need

At least the suburb home has land, however small, and you can modify it quite heavily even with HOAs.

Home in the suburbs will have a backyard for your several children to play safely. Plenty of space between you and neighbors, no shared walls. Free parking in your own garage and really easy to bring shopping or whatever into your home. Why would any sane person choose otherwise?

Owning a wood cabin in a fucking woods.

Also permaculture and solar panels.

No shit a homestead with a high level of self sufficiency is better, but that's not what's being asked.

Having both

FPBP
Also both, at the same time

KYS OP. Neither are "redpilled". Redpilled would be buying land inawoods and building your own home.

Also space for doing projects that require you be outside, like sanding and painting furniture, washing your own car.

it is more redpilled to own a homestead and this

I want a highrise apartment in NYC so I can pretend I live on coruscant

Attached: 30-park-place-1.jpg (736x491, 41.51K)

An estate, out in the country.

Attached: 9f1f4519ca698f9f5957aad0a1f7fccb9732ab9d_big.jpg (1121x840, 146.54K)

This homestead house in bum fuck anywhere idea is lame and shit
Self sufficiency without giving up tons of convenience is a lie
Like you wanna work and toil the land till your 90
no one here has enough gumption and no you’re not already doing this you’re a fag and a liar
Have fun going to walmart in a four commute to eat stir fried shit

fucking dorks

Owning a home in the country and not having to deal with city trash.

>What’s the more redpilled choice? Owning a home in the suburbs, or owning a condo in the city?
0 interest question

Attached: judenase.jpg (608x494, 44.2K)

this mary poppins shit its worst that the commie blocks and burgers suburbs