The Term Anglo-Saxon is problematic

Was watching some shit about Norse history on YT and the uploader asked in the comment section: Do you think there are better fighters than the Vikings?
Obviously I just replied with The Anglo-Saxons. They're the obvious choice as they're the ones who defeated the Vikings time and time again.
Then this happened lol (pic related)
I honestly thought it was a joke until I saw what she looks like from checking out her channel. This is some flat out Orwellian deconstruction of language and historical revisionism. That's a university educated woman right there.

Attached: the correct scholarly terminology.png (922x1234, 266.67K)

She later added that she has read 1984 after I made a comparison and she then bragged about being proud of deconstructing language and revising history. Then I mocked her for saying dude and I don't even think she knew I was joking.

Attached: problematic.png (926x581, 77.33K)

>They weren't necessarily all white
>necessarily
Even she knows it's horse shit otherwise she'd be confident in her use of language. Just tell her she is politicizing history for her own seflish gain. Gee I wonder what is a more accurate interpretation of history the unbroken one given to us for 1000 years or the revision made in a Jewish college 10 years ago. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I already closed the conversation with her lol, I didn't want the drama and I obviously wasn't getting anywhere with her.

Idk, it's up to bongs to give the real history but from what I know the Normans fucked the Saxons didn't they? Technically they're all the fucking same anyways there's very little differences, plus the UK was occupied by Rome for like 350 years too

Yea I know that. But using her logic saying Norman, Roman or even Celtic are racially charged terms and very problematic lmao
I just don't even know where to begin with that line of reasoning.
She couldn't be any more of a sterotype.

we wuz anglo saxons

Attached: old english.jpg (300x300, 140.65K)

Why would you even argue? It's a waste of time trying to redpill normies because they'll never learn

Just looking at her picture tells all I need to know. People like that are all the same, stupid and disgusting dishonestly lead "individuals."

Because my autism when it comes to medieval times knows no bounds and she struck a gear with me. I'm also a big fan of George Orwell and her historical revisionism did another number on me.
>My desktop (pic related)
>A depiction of French knights who are about to all be killed at the battle of Agencourt

Attached: 1532180428033.jpg (4000x1818, 3.28M)

She's like the retards that spend all their time picking a folder naming scheme and never populating it with actual documents
>10 minute videos
Ok bitch very deep

I was on a camping trip and my buddy brought his gf who has a degree in aboriginal studies, of course she was in a conversation with my gf about American history and eventually the smallpox blankets subject came up, I overheard and immediately jumped in: "That was the Spanish and it almost 200 years before the formation of the colonies"
Her visible confusion was enough to make me cum. I wasn't letting that bitch flat out lie to my gf. She got flustered and kept going on and I even noted that it was the American cavalry after the fact who had to intervene just to stop the Indians from genociding each other. She mumbled something like 'Idk why every always thinks they're helping' and the conversation was over lol

They don't care about history because they are taught everything about their own history is a lie or a jab at minorities. No pity for them when they all get replaced and burn out in hell for destroying such a beautiful civilization and landscape that WAS Canada.

There was hardly a non white in all of the isles until 1800's. There are many written cases where people had literally never seen a black or even hispanic or asian person ever in their life prior to having a reaction. Hence the "Are you painted" questions in old books. Whites had gone 45 years and literally never seen a black person before, to the point of thinking it was literally paint. And that was after the islands were known to have nonwhite immigration.

During the Anglo-Saxxon age in question they were the only people there. We know even by the time the US was being settled some new towns remained literally 100% anglo saxon for over a century. It remained that way until around the time of the civil war. It describes hundreds of years of culture that is very much tied to a single race.

If she is college educated on the subject then I am afraid college is becoming a stupid waste of time that hyperfocuses SJW revisions.

>racially-charged
i too love making up words

Attached: drool cat.png (1080x1081, 1.09M)

See though, one of their squires met a servant who claimed that his brother's next door neighbor's best friends room mate had seen a painted man once while at a port to pick up fish. Therefore, nothing pictured counts as white culture anymore.

leftism is a mental disorder
the average leftist is not even operating in reality

Yep, you're dealing with a fucking verified post-modernist.

The 'signifier of the signifier' horsehit if Lacanian psychoanalysis ie. 'if you get mad about your wife fucking another man, the rage you feel is still pathological because you psychologically need to feel it.' Sounds like a meme, but no, it isn't.

Just respond with 'Lacan was a discredited cultist who other psychologists laughed at' and watch her rage.

The Normans replaced the Saxon ruling class after Hastings but they didn't ethnically replace the average person. The Normans did this all throughout Europe and the Middle East.

Attached: 1581203185289.jpg (540x720, 59.16K)

Every native north of 45 degrees is white save the eskimos who have to eat seal fat for vitamin D.
She is also why gingers are violently bullied in schools they are soulless demons.

Attached: 1587021809652.webm (1280x720, 2.89M)

Please just add a nice little parthian shot of 'also Lacan was a fucking idiot.'

Post this copy pasta there pic related

Attached: British.png (1330x546, 33.83K)

Jesus Christ this can't be real life right now

So why is Norse okay but Anglo-Saxon not? are they not both describing the ethnicity/ culture of older civilizations?

Sorry just need to point out that the Normans were actually dangerously based

Attached: 1280px-Normannen.png (1280x929, 968.87K)

They figure that by being behind 4 or 5 decimal points behind 0 they are still a minority and thus requiring equal representation. You need to abandon logic when performing these calculations.

What foul fantasy is this

Attached: 1584486940592.jpg (541x437, 21.21K)

women should be banned from posting on the internet

She looks like a kike

They are. It's essentially the equivalent of saying Korean is racist. The correct scholarly terminology would be South Eastern-Asian I guess?
The reasoning just holds no grounds, idk how these ppl can function without any self awareness.

I'm using that as a meme from now on tho desu
lmao
'The correct scholarly terminology'
Then proceed to talk like a retard about something

So let me see if I understand this. Europe was always multicultural. To refer to it as 'white' is wrong. The accomplishments there for are not 'white', but multicultural. OK. Does that apply to things like colonialism? After all, if Europe was multicultural and all then wasn't colonialism a multicultural act? And would it not further imply that Africa was also multicultural and thus colonialism as a multicultural act upon a multicultural area - that the current racial implications that are taught are in fact wrong.

>problematic

I think they're aware but malicious. I also think you nailed it that it's an attempt to revise history to subvert present interests.

WTF LMAO

The more you think about it the better it gets.

Attached: 1583708373958.gif (217x217, 1.46M)