Actually violence is pretty smart, after evaluating all your options you realise that none of the others are effective, such as argue my with somebody who will never change their mind.
Violence is therefore the only effective tool left, as you don't need to argue with a dead person.
Conclusion violence is pretty smart and based.
The real stupid ones are the ones who believe they an change society by "voting" and through peaceful-only actions...
>Inb4 glownigger
Also pic semi-related
being violent is being emotive
bad, baby tier behavior
This is now a chocolatine-only thread. All “chocolate bread” niggers fuck off.
Based and redpilled.
However, ironically it is the French more than the English who understand this.
When French people don't get what they want, they riot. When Irish don't get what they want, they blow up your Prime Minister. When Englishmen don't get what they want, they keep calm and carry on.
I love my English brothers, but we can all learn from each other.
Seethe harder Monsieur
All you know is submission and surrendering
violence in the age of m.a.d. makes zero sense
Sorry , i don't speak My Army Gets Humiliated By A Virgin Peasant Girl During The HYW.
They are based when it comes to their own government not doing what they want I'll give them that but whenever an invading force comes they all cower away.
As for England luckily violence is making a rapid comeback now. Violence is good because it keeps people in check and reduces the level of active arseholes.
The Taliban or Isis don't seem too worried, or literally any other middle Eastern country. China isn't bothered, Russia isn't bothered, if they want land they just take it.
So why should we be bothered? What are they going to do nuke the whole of London?
The ultimate enemy of the people right now is the government.
As for the cheese eating surrender monkey meme, you know, France withstood more pain in WW1 than England or America did and they did not give up. In WW2, they had no real reason to continue fighting when Britain was pulling out. Why should Frenchmen die by the million to support the British war effort when Britain bombed their own navy?
Again, I apologize as I am not here to poopoo the glorious history of Great Britain. Just to point out that the French are not surrender monkeys. ffs, France was once famous for their suicidal bravery. Just look at the National Guardsmen at the Battle of Waterloo, who all chose to die rather than surrender.
Anyway, I am glad to hear that Englishmen are becoming more Revolutionary minded. We need a British Republican Army. Ironically, they should ally with the IRA and bomb London too. London is the enemy of mankind. We need an American Republican Army and a French one too and they should bomb the real enemy.
you dont have to be emotive to be violent faggot
you can kill with cold blood and no emotions
same way you whack a weed
because Jews are generally unable to resort to violence and Jews made the saying to make themselves feel smarter for being cowards.
When smart people resort to violence it has a tenancy to overturn apply carts in an effective way.
I am glad to hear that Englishmen are becoming more Revolutionary minded.
It seems to be coming from the younger people like me mostly, a lot of boomers are still deluded and love to lock boots. "Oh the government would never harm its own people".
I was actually surprised that we were the first country to start burning 5g towers here, the British have a warrior spirit embedded in them it just needs certain conditions to activate it.
I am still yet to see anything like that in America no offence, but I am glad that you are glad.
Just read history. We tried violence. It sucks. You want to use leverage and threats not violence as such.
This is the universal law of the reality:
God created everything, and He saw that it was good.
With our free will, we started to use things in ways they were not supposed to used. We started doing things we were not supposed to do. We went against our purpose. We disobeyed God. The act of disobedience is what gave Mankind the knowledge of evil; the fruit was not magical and did not imbue us with any brain powers. It was learning that going against our purpose, which is to do as God created us to do; that was us gaining the knowledge of good and evil.
Using food for pleasure instead of nourishment is gluttony, and leads to the crippling of the body and eventually death. Using the anus for sexual purposes instead of excreting leads to disease, which leads to the crippling of the body and eventually death.
Mis-using things is corruption. All things are good, and all good things can be corrupted, and when they are corrupted they become evil.
It is the duty of Man to destroy corruption where-ever we find it. Tales of doctors amputating limbs, farmers warding away the locust, traitors being cast out of the home and monsters being slain by heroes all advocate the same thing; corruption must be removed.
There are two ways to remove corruption. Wholesale extermination or banishment. Both are right and appropriate at different times.
Stop thinking of it as 'violence', start thinking of it as 'neutralizing the cancer'. Deus vult.
Bonjour Nigel
What's the point in using threats if you are not willing to live up them.
People will soon just ignore you when they realise you are all talk no action.
Boomers are among the most pathetic people on the planet. They ruin everything they touch with their cuckservatism and greed.
They ruined Golden Dawn because they were afraid of Revolution. They continue to suppress young Revolutionaries in America because they think that Qanon and Trump will save them. They are like a mental virus that prevents manly action. Boomers are responsible for "YOURE GLOWING" every time anyone here questions the legitimacy of the illegal Regime and praises violence against tyranny.
>I am still yet to see anything like that in America
Yes. Trust me, I am painfully aware of this flaw in our character. I could blame the cuckservatism of boomers but it is more than just that. Americans lack the mental infrastructure of revolution.
The last time Americans engaged in revolutionary activity was in the 1980s and it was a very embarrassing affaire.
Many are working on correcting this flaw in our character but it is extremely difficult as it is a mental failing, not a physical one.
You have to be able to back up the threats but the violence isn't useful itself. It's only useful as far as the threat of it provides leverage. If you're good at the game you never need actual violence.
I know what you mean it really pisses me off when I see americucks (not u) go on about how they have an entire garage full of guns and muh second amendment, you have powerful weapons which even we don't have yet you seem to do the least fighting back out of all western countries
You get the one guy every so often who attempts to fight back but nobody backs him up and he is just forgotten about. "That crazy guy" rather than "That guy who actually tried to make a change"".
You have the firepower but lack the will, we have the will but lack the firepower. Honestly if we had guns you would getb100s of people getting murdered each day.
This is why we are beeing overrun by mudslimes and niggers. Whites are weak. Violence is the answer to primitive behaviour from primitive cultures.
Stop playing this card it's only childish and overused. You're 16?
Sometimes you need to fight fire with fire.
Mudslides and niggers don't give a shit about being violent, they don't care if they die as far as they are concerned they are happy that they tried and will be remembered by their people.
>nobody backs him up and he is just forgotten about
That right there is the problem.
Europeans have a history of conflict. Particularly those on the edges of empires. This created a social situation where violence was considered high status. Resistance was praised. Killing your enemies was good.
Too, Europeans tended to live in *communities* that were rooted in the land. Your ancestors lived in X town or X region for centuries. This rootedness allows better organization against tyranny.
America on the otherhand has been safe from real violence for centuries (excepting the civil war). The places where you see the best insurgent infrastructure is in areas that had conflicts with the Siberians/(Indians). Everywhere that was pacified has degraded into a culture where violence is considered low status.
Example; Look at how conservatives react to every single provocation. They talk about how they'll own the left ONLY if the left starts genociding them. The time to strike is BEFORE the enemy is ready to kick down our doors and take "ar gunz". Not after. Yet conservatives are stuck in the mental prison of victimhood. They think that striking first (and winning) is sinful. And whenever a "conservative" strikes back against the vile System, he is denounced by his own side FIRST.
Have you ever seen an American leftist or liberal denounce violence from their own side? I don't.
Why are leftists apparently unaffected by the pacifist virus? Well, they are brought up to view violence as high status. Every time a leftist shitlib burns down a Republican headquarters, they receive praise and adoration. What happens to Republicans who do that? They're denounced by their own friends. Traitors, cowards, backstabbers, losers.
The path to victory is to change the hearts of "conservatives" and this is an uphill battle. But that is the answer as to why we lack the will despite having the firepower to burn this genocidal system to the ground in a day.
If a tactic is your last option it's not a good option is it retard
If you solve all your problems with violence then other people will eventually use violence to solve you as the problem.
Yeah you make some great points there, and I agree why let the enemy prepare, if you know they want to attack you then strike them before they get too strong!
Its a last resort because ideally you should be able to use language first but it has got the point where nobody is interested in listening or will say you aren't allowed to say that, if you can't express yourself verbally the. What other choice do you have but to express your self in the oldest and most effective means.
Language was made so we could settle things without going straight to violence but now it's easier to just go straight to violencen and raises most people do t care about what you say these days.
Wow is this the single based mutt on this godforsaken board?
Get your teeth fixed
THEY ALREADY USE VIOLENCE AGAINST US. I FUCKING dare you to deny the Holocaust on Twitter and see what happens.
Of course I understand that principle but they are being violent to us first, it is best to use non violent means first but they are making that virtually impossible now. Can't you see???
Speak English
If you use violence too readily, you send out the message that that is all you understand, "live by the sword, die by the sword".
It has to be a last resort, in other words that you prefer to use other means. This is especially important when you aren't in power, because otherwise those in power will fight fire with fire. What's more just like war its undesirable in of itself. Its costly in every possible way.
Hell yeah! Bring back the kingdom of Burgundy!
Yes, and i believe in trying other ways but those other ways are being surpressed and other people just don't want to know.
"Live by the sword die by the sword" is a warning not to use violence to get your way all the time. It doesn't mean don't use violence to protect your people from enemy forces
don't talk shit fucking nigger
France should become a federal union. The regions are too different and should not be ruled by a parisian government that doesn't give a shit about them.
State of Brittany, State of Burgundy, State of Alsace etc. with a lot of independency much better desu
Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived. No, that isn't just a Starship Troopers quote.
Good take. It's the same with Italy desu.