How would an anarcho-communist state work

Just look at black neighborhoods in the USA to get an idea of how that works

I'd buy the leader and make the whole state work for me for free. If there are no leaders. I will create them.

archive.is/cxgdV
>property
>money; voluntary exchange for mutual benefit
>freedom of travel
>religious institutions honored
>peace with adjacent, strikingly different race -- no evidence of race mixing
>peaceful noncompliance with the crown
and also note, that because it was the crown, there was no military invasion. even monarchy is better than a "republic."

It's fundamentally broken because it requires there to be virtually no corruption and everyone needs to be true to it, which is only possible on a small scale.

What if I rally the people to my side and install a fascist state. What are you going to do about it?

Oh cool, here we go with "not real anarchism" now, on top of the classic "not real communism". Funny thing is that you're talking about a place that was actually legitimate anarchism. Also a place that is deified and looked to by the far left as some kind of idealistic model of what left-wing libertarianism would actually look like in practice. But whatever.

work?

Pretty sure ancaps don't want a state.

Dissidents die first, the rest later.

*ancoms.

bubba and tyrone kick the shit out of autists and sell their toys on ebay

Suicide cults.

It would require enormous social capital - i.e. Social trust and solidarity.
Hence it would only work in an ethnically homogeneous population. I wonde if the Anarcho-fags realise this though.

Yeah, that's syndicalism, a fairly tame and adult form of anarchism that is grown enough to realize that money is not going anywhere. "Anarcho-communism", which faggot OP is talking about is an oxymoron. It's communists masquerading as anarchists in order to make their revolution seem a bit more palatable and sexier.

It was openly supported by capitalists and fags like George Orwell. Also the falangists weren't really right wing. The whole spanish civil war was one big meme.

Anarcho-communism is redundant. It's just anarchism. And it works by forming voluntary communities and having an administration that represses a state -- you can consider a 'state' to be any apparatus that funds itself through extortion (using violence or the threat of violence to force compliance with taxation).

There are examples of modern Anarchism, such as the Zapatistas in Mexico, and other self-declared 'autonomous' zones in various countries where state law enforcement is too ineffective to stomp them out.

Oh "by capitalists and fags like George Orwell" who was an avowed socialist. Who fought for socialism. OK.
It sounds to me like you're someone from the auth left and you have this beef against supposed libertarian leftism. Whatever dude. I really don't give a shit about your gay schism with the auth left and the lib left. I think you're both cancer. I'm actually probably a bit slightly to the left myself, and def libertarian, but whatever I still think you're both two groups of cancer

Orwell was mostly a british empire shill. He wasn't really a socialist. At various points in his life he was either a loyal british officer l, a left wing anarchist, a trotskyist, whatever. He was a dumbass and a plagiarist manufactured by the mi5.

>Anarcho-communism is redundant. It's just anarchism
Wrong. It's just communism. Every time the "anarcho-communists" have been out and about, they're leaving behind hammer and sickle slogans and "liberals get the bullet too" propaganda and the like.
They're communists pretending to be anarchists. Make no fucking mistake.

OK but whatever you say. Nobody cares. Anarchist Spain was anarchist. Not really a point up for debate so you're just wasting your breath with this transparent butthurt in trying to own yet another failed society of the left with the tired "not real communism" meme, or in this case "not real anarchism"

It was not anarchist. In their own words it was anarcho-syndicalist. Also I don't actually like anarchism. I'm a statist. Anarchism as an ideology is a major plague on the left. It sells people fairytales. Modern day anarchism is effectively neoliberalism with a more radical spin. Bakunin was based tho

>Also I don't actually like anarchism. I'm a statist. Anarchism as an ideology is a major plague on the left.
I know. That's exactly what I said you were above. See? I am psychic and right about everything. And I'm also right when I say that you're a faggot and anarchist Spain was quite literally and indisputably anarchist

That's what I said. Anarchism is communism, and communism is anarchism. The difference is that communism usually refers to Marxist-Leninism which is a method of achieving communism by using a state to destroy capitalism first (allegedly, one day, probably after the sun dies), whereas Anarchists skip the middle step and just go straight for statelessness and communes immediately.

Look at what happened in Spain in the 30's and you have your answer.