Whoooshhhh

lol at the ignorance

>abo
>calling anyone else low iq
kek

Calm down Muhammad.

LOL
Amerishart propganda has DESTROYED your brain. READ A BOOK

Stop shilling for Iran your making Aussies look bad

>Anonymous (ID: 0y9MzYq7) 04/16/20(Thu)01:32:51 No.253683916
>LOL
>Amerishart propganda has DESTROYED your brain. READ A BOOK

Attached: rage-face_le-derp.jpg (512x512, 23.31K)

>HAHA IF WE LAUNCH 30 BILLION OF VALUE AT 12 BILLION OF VALUE WHILE HAVING THE SMALLER ECONOMY WE TOTALLY WIN!

:^)

Have you Amerisharts written your WILLS yet? Because believe ME you will want to VERY soon. Iran does NOT mess around and will NOT hesitate to KILL you. Its been a long time coming but JUSTICE will be SERVED

Chaff. AI hacking your weapon systems.
We've been investing in electronic warfare for a reason. Why else do you think the F35 is so heavy? It can wreck your shit from beyond sight and if there's any guidance mechanism on your weapons it's getting fucked.

ASM capabilities would be destroyed before carriers even got in range of any enemies.

And tell me, fellow retard, even if you somehow found the fucking thing, how on fucking Earth are you going to be able to hit it? Aircraft carriers are very nimble relative to their size, and no missile on Earth can be guided with the kind of precision you're thinking of from that far a distance
>muh jets
Even more delusional thinking any attack aircraft could even get close enough to a US carrier to be able to score a direct hit. Your understanding of things military is so basic it's actually bordering fantasy.

I think you mean 30 million. And no crew losses either. That means no training trade off losses, whereas the carrier has to train another 5.5k people.

Yeah and it also doesnt matter if our countries dont allow us to have guns cause the criminals can choke on a sausage and just die. All it takes is one sausage.

Dude, your a proper sped if you think any type of short range missile like the pic related is going to do anything to an aircraft carrier. You would have to launch literally hundreds at it before you even made a dint.

You only exist because we do bro. After the nigs and spics die in the front lines it will be fellow whites that would come to aid you, you do realize that right?

This

Mate, are you Tasmanian or just retarded

>posts a pic of a harpoon being launched from a US ship
also, it would take a lot to sink a carrier. ships have to take massive damage to the keel to sink in one hit. navy ships are designed to be highly damaged and partially filled with water in a lot of compartments and still float.
whoooosh, thats how much some stupid fucking leafnigger knows about surface warfare.

shitran would never make it out of their mountains, what will they do, shout at us on the internet?

God I hate leafs.

youtu.be/oxpwIsZCgtM

if you keep felating Iran like that, China is going to get jealous

Basically this
OP is a retard

Everyone does.

>whoooshhh

That's all it takes and another year goes by with the Stanley cup being firmly in the hands of another American team. What is Canada going to do to address this glaring problem?

Attached: skills-accuracy-ovi-1024x739.jpg (1024x739, 134.78K)

So useless China is building em while boasting about their missiles.

>old as fuck outdated video
Kek, good luck with that
Interesting that you discredit American information and then try to use it for your argument

It has over a 99.6% interception rate. And there are multiple of them surrounding each aircraft carrier. Usually 10+.

If you fired 10,000 missiles at a US aircraft carrier, one of them might hit it, but would be unlikely to sink it.

-That wasn't anywhere near the size of a carrier
-It assumes an offensive advantage where you're within striking distance of the carrier (highly unlikely as part of naval doctrine is to avoid enemy Fleets unless its objective is to engage one)
-It assumes a defensive advantage where you can even afford both the time and munitions to strike (highly unlikely if you directly engage a US fleet, your frigates and destroyers would be focusing on their counter-parts and not the carrier)
-You're an idiot for even thinking its a ships job to engage a carrier (that has historically been and still is on submarines and aircraft). All ships around a carrier exist to protect it. The more ships you lose in defense of the carrier, the more open your own fleet is to attacks from carrier aircraft.

>BOOM
that's all it takes for 1.5 Billion chinks to die. What is China going to do to address this glaring problem?

Attached: nuke bomb.jpg (1536x1206, 457.88K)

Attached: 467AE9B9-3C6F-4F13-BF1D-01BC9E5B0492.jpg (736x716, 68.08K)